Rankings#
We draw a connection between Nietzsche’s critique of historical use and the recent events surrounding the toppling of monuments during the pandemic and the George Floyd protests. Nietzsche warned against a one-sided, critical approach to history that seeks only to deconstruct and criticize the past without appreciating its inspiring (monumental) or preservational (antiquarian) roles.
The destruction of monuments, especially those connected to colonialism or slavery, resonates with Nietzsche’s idea of history being “used” or “abused” based on present needs. In this case, the critical aspect of history was deployed to question and dismantle symbols of oppression, but perhaps without the balancing acts of remembering and learning from the past’s complexities.
Harold Bloom’s “school of resentment” is a fitting addition to this conversation. Bloom criticized movements within academia and culture that he believed focused excessively on grievance and resentment, leading to a revolutionary, almost puritanical impulse to tear down the past without necessarily providing a constructive way forward. The link to the riots and the toppling of monuments is apt: these actions are revolutionary in nature, rejecting the old symbols but also, at times, risking a descent into a purely negative, critical mode that might fail to build or inspire.
In both Nietzsche and Bloom’s critiques, there’s an underlying warning: history’s power lies not just in its ability to condemn but also in its capacity to elevate, inspire, and offer a sense of continuity. The challenge is to balance these aspects without tipping into what Nietzsche feared—using history solely as a tool for current agendas, stripping it of its broader, more enriching functions.
Jung vs. Freud#
1. Chaos
\
2. Frenzy -> 4. Uncommunicable -> 5. Algorithms -> 6. Binary
/
3. Energy
Id 1, 2, 3#
Ego 4#
Superego 5, 6#
Carl Jung vs. Sigmund Freud is a classic debate in psychology, often filled with passion and strong opinions. Here’s my take:
Sigmund Freud: Freud’s contributions to psychology are monumental. He is the father of psychoanalysis, introducing concepts such as the unconscious mind, defense mechanisms, and the importance of early childhood experiences. Freud’s theories on the Oedipus complex, id, ego, and superego have deeply influenced not only psychology but also culture, literature, and art. His work laid the foundation for understanding human behavior, making him indispensable in the history of psychology. However, many of his ideas are now seen as outdated and overly focused on sexuality.
Carl Jung: Jung expanded on Freud’s ideas but took them in a different, and arguably more holistic, direction. He introduced concepts such as the collective unconscious, archetypes, and individuation. Jung’s work is profound in exploring the deeper layers of the psyche and connecting psychological experiences with spirituality and mythology. His theories on introversion and extraversion form the basis of modern personality psychology. While Jung’s ideas can be seen as more esoteric, they offer a richer, more nuanced understanding of the human mind.
Ranking:#
Freud: For foundational influence, groundbreaking theories, and establishing psychoanalysis as a field.
Jung: For expanding the scope of psychology, introducing enduring concepts like archetypes, and bridging psychology with broader cultural and spiritual dimensions.
Personal Preference:#
I find Jung’s work more compelling and applicable in understanding the human psyche in a broader, more integrative way. His ideas on the collective unconscious and archetypes resonate deeply with the complexities of human experience, making him my preferred thinker in this comparison. However, Freud’s pioneering work cannot be understated, and his foundational theories are essential to the study of psychology.
Linear 1, 2, 3#
Categorical 4#
Binary 5, 6#
1. Error
\
2. Fit: Bias-Variance -> 4. Rankings -> 5. Top -> 6. Achievement
/
3. Mean