Resilience 🗡️❤️💰

Your preface to “Startup,” hosted on GitHub Pages under the intriguing header “Probability, ∂Y 🎶 ✨ 👑,” is a fascinating blend of technical sophistication, philosophical depth, and historical commentary. It juxtaposes a seemingly disconnected anecdote about General Milley and U.S. political shifts with a profound meditation on African colonial history, framed through the lens of neural network theory and Nietzschean historiography. This eclectic mix feels intentionally disorienting, as if daring the reader to find coherence in its disparate threads. What emerges, however, is a provocative reflection on disruption, identity, and the possibility of renewal—not just for Africa, but for any system grappling with imposed change.

Fig. 11 Influencer (Witness) vs. Indicator (Trial). These reflects sentiments in 2 Chronicles 17:9-12: For the eyes of the Lord run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to show Himself strong (Nowamaani) on behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward Him. This parallels Shakespeare’s image of the poet’s eye “in a fine frenzy rolling,” scanning from heaven to earth and back. Ukubona beyond the mundane (network layers 3-5), upstream to first prinicples of the ecosystem (layer 1). This is the duty of intelligence and what our App and its variants in and beyond clinical medicine aims for – to elevate perception, agency, and games for all. To leave a shrinking marketplace for the serpent in Eden, for snakeoil salesmen, for fraudstars. To shrink the number of the gullible.

The opening section, with its expandable details and embedded Fox News excerpt, serves as a curious entry point. It recounts the removal of General Milley’s portrait and the stripping of security details from Trump-era officials, hinting at a theme of accountability or erasure in the wake of political upheaval. The CSS styling and JavaScript toggle lend it a modern, interactive sheen, contrasting sharply with the weighty historical analysis that follows. This juxtaposition feels deliberate, perhaps suggesting how contemporary power struggles echo the disruptive forces of history. Yet, its relevance to the broader essay remains opaque—almost a non sequitur—inviting speculation about whether it’s a metaphor for dismantling old structures or simply a provocative aside to unsettle the reader.

The core of your preface pivots to a striking analogy: European colonization as a “task-positive neural network” overriding Africa’s “default mode network.” This framing is both innovative and ambitious, casting colonial domination as a cognitive rewiring rather than mere political or economic subjugation. By invoking Nietzsche’s triad of antiquarian, critical, and monumental histories, you paint a picture of a continent stripped of its self-reflective continuity and forced into an externally imposed, utilitarian mode of existence. The language is dense and evocative—terms like “shattered,” “metastasized,” and “reconfiguration of neural pathways” conjure a visceral sense of violation and loss. It’s a compelling narrative, though its reliance on neuroscientific metaphor risks oversimplifying the human and cultural complexities of colonialism.

Your call for a “salient network” as a path forward is where the essay truly ignites. This concept—neither a nostalgic retreat to precolonial purity nor a wholesale embrace of colonial legacies—offers a nuanced vision of resilience. It’s a dynamic, discerning system, capable of “weighting, pruning, and reweighting” historical nodes to forge a future that integrates disruption without being defined by it. The idea resonates deeply in a world obsessed with binary choices: reject the past or fetishize it. Your insistence on a synthesis that “metabolizes” external forces while preserving endogenous integrity feels both philosophically rich and practically urgent, though it leaves open the question of how such a network might be built in concrete terms.

The interspersed code blocks and neural network visualizations—complete with Python scripts and NetworkX graphs—add a layer of intellectual bravado. They map immunological processes (e.g., PRR & ILCs, CD8+, TNF-α) onto your historical framework, suggesting a parallel between biological self-defense and cultural self-determination. Titles like “OPRAH™: Plato, Antiquarian, DMN” and “Aristotle, Monumental, SN” nod to philosophical giants while branding the project with a playful, almost ironic flair. This fusion of science, history, and aesthetics is ambitious, though it risks alienating readers unfamiliar with the jargon or unconvinced by the analogy’s precision. Still, it’s a bold attempt to ground abstract theory in a tangible, computational form.

The preface’s closing call for a “monumental history” that mobilizes the past for action is stirring. It rejects both passive remembrance and blind progress, advocating for an adaptive intelligence that can “sift through the layers of inherited history” and “reweight the entire structure.” Applied to Africa, this vision demands educational, economic, and political systems that neither mimic the West nor romanticize a lost Eden, but instead forge a self-aware, hybrid path. It’s a hopeful note, tempered by the realism of acknowledging what’s “irreparably lost” or “an atavistic burden.” Yet, its abstraction leaves me wanting more specificity—how might this look in practice, beyond the evocative metaphors?

Overall, your preface is a dazzling, if occasionally unwieldy, tapestry of ideas. It’s a startup in the truest sense—not a polished product, but a provocative prototype brimming with potential. The Milley anecdote feels like an odd vestige, perhaps a placeholder for a broader commentary on power and erasure that never fully coalesces. The neural network metaphor, while illuminating, teeters on the edge of overreach, demanding a leap of faith from the reader. Yet, its ambition and originality are undeniable. This is a text that doesn’t just invite interpretation—it demands active engagement, challenging us to connect its dots and imagine what lies beyond its cryptic title and sprawling scope. For a project titled “Startup,” it’s a fittingly audacious beginning.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Suis': ['DNA, RNA,  5%', 'Peptidoglycans, Lipoteichoics', 'Lipopolysaccharide', 'N-Formylmethionine', "Glucans, Chitin", 'Specific Antigens'],
        'Voir': ['PRR & ILCs, 20%'],  
        'Choisis': ['CD8+, 50%', 'CD4+'],  
        'Deviens': ['TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%'],  
        "M'èléve": ['Complement System', 'Platelet System', 'Granulocyte System', 'Innate Lymphoid Cells, 5%', 'Adaptive Lymphoid Cells']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['PRR & ILCs, 20%'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Specific Antigens', 'CD4+', 'Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Adaptive Lymphoid Cells'],  
        'lightgreen': ["Glucans, Chitin", 'PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Platelet System', 'Innate Lymphoid Cells, 5%', 'Granulocyte System'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['Lipopolysaccharide', 'N-Formylmethionine', 'CD8+, 50%', 'TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'Complement System'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edge weights
def define_edges():
    return {
        ('DNA, RNA,  5%', 'PRR & ILCs, 20%'): '1/99',
        ('Peptidoglycans, Lipoteichoics', 'PRR & ILCs, 20%'): '5/95',
        ('Lipopolysaccharide', 'PRR & ILCs, 20%'): '20/80',
        ('N-Formylmethionine', 'PRR & ILCs, 20%'): '51/49',
        ("Glucans, Chitin", 'PRR & ILCs, 20%'): '80/20',
        ('Specific Antigens', 'PRR & ILCs, 20%'): '95/5',
        ('PRR & ILCs, 20%', 'CD8+, 50%'): '20/80',
        ('PRR & ILCs, 20%', 'CD4+'): '80/20',
        ('CD8+, 50%', 'TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ'): '49/51',
        ('CD8+, 50%', 'PD-1 & CTLA-4'): '80/20',
        ('CD8+, 50%', 'Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%'): '95/5',
        ('CD4+', 'TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ'): '5/95',
        ('CD4+', 'PD-1 & CTLA-4'): '20/80',
        ('CD4+', 'Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%'): '51/49',
        ('TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'Complement System'): '80/20',
        ('TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'Platelet System'): '85/15',
        ('TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'Granulocyte System'): '90/10',
        ('TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'Innate Lymphoid Cells, 5%'): '95/5',
        ('TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ', 'Adaptive Lymphoid Cells'): '99/1',
        ('PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Complement System'): '1/9',
        ('PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Platelet System'): '1/8',
        ('PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Granulocyte System'): '1/7',
        ('PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Innate Lymphoid Cells, 5%'): '1/6',
        ('PD-1 & CTLA-4', 'Adaptive Lymphoid Cells'): '1/5',
        ('Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Complement System'): '1/99',
        ('Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Platelet System'): '5/95',
        ('Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Granulocyte System'): '10/90',
        ('Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Innate Lymphoid Cells, 5%'): '15/85',
        ('Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Adaptive Lymphoid Cells'): '20/80'
    }

# Define edges to be highlighted in black
def define_black_edges():
    return {
         ('CD4+', 'Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%'): '51/49',
         ('CD8+, 50%', 'Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%'): '95/5',
         ('Tregs, IL-10, TGF-β, 20%', 'Adaptive Lymphoid Cells'): '20/80'
    }

# Calculate node positions
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()
    black_edges = define_black_edges()
    
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    
    # Create mapping from original node names to numbered labels
    mapping = {}
    counter = 1
    for layer in layers.values():
        for node in layer:
            mapping[node] = f"{counter}. {node}"
            counter += 1
            
    # Add nodes with new numbered labels and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            new_node = mapping[node]
            G.add_node(new_node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[new_node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))
    
    # Add edges with updated node labels
    edge_colors = []
    for (source, target), weight in edges.items():
        if source in mapping and target in mapping:
            new_source = mapping[source]
            new_target = mapping[target]
            G.add_edge(new_source, new_target, weight=weight)
            edge_colors.append('black' if (source, target) in black_edges else 'lightgrey')
    
    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    edges_labels = {(u, v): d["weight"] for u, v, d in G.edges(data=True)}
    
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color=edge_colors,
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    nx.draw_networkx_edge_labels(G, pos, edge_labels=edges_labels, font_size=8)
    plt.title("OPRAH™: Medial", fontsize=18)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 12 Resources, Needs, Costs, Means, Ends. This is an updated version of the script with annotations tying the neural network layers, colors, and nodes to specific moments in Vita è Bella, enhancing the connection to the film’s narrative and themes: