Traditional

The past week has unfolded as an elegant experiment in dietary structure, revealing a pattern of consumption that mirrors the cadence of thought itself—a neural network of sustenance, where each node, each connection, shapes the experience of satiety. At its core, the transformation has not been about restriction, but rather about the reweighting of intake, the rhythm of selection, the syntax of nourishment. This has been a week not of deprivation, but of a kind of cognitive liberation, where the placement of food in space has dictated a prosody of consumption in time.

Fig. 33 Our protagonist’s odyssey unfolds across landscapes of five flats, six flats, and three sharps. With remarkable delight and sure-footedness, the journey explores the full range of extensions and alterations of basic triads and seventh chords across all seven modes.

Each element of this diet—carefully sliced, aesthetically minimal, distributed across the table in a manner that invites interaction without coercion—has produced a remarkable effect: the elimination of craving. There has been no urgency, no compulsion to consume beyond what the body naturally calls for. The result has been a profound contrast to the usual paradigm of eating, in which large portions impose a kind of psychological contract: the necessity to finish, or else to discard. When food is served as undifferentiated mass, the act of eating becomes an adversarial engagement, a contest between discipline and indulgence. But in this new structure, where food appears as tokens scattered across a tableau, the dynamic shifts entirely. Consumption is no longer about compulsion, but about rhythm.

The spatial layout of the food echoes the principles of the CDC plate method: a balance of proteins, vegetables, fruits, and grains, but decomposed into its finest articulations, its elemental components. Instead of a meal as a monolithic event, each bite is a choice, a unit of meaning, an instance of syntax. In this dietary grammar, the syntactical units—the slices of fruit, the carefully portioned cheese, the segmented nuts—are not obligations. They are options, waiting for their moment to be selected, but never demanding to be consumed en masse. And so, the act of eating transforms from an act of finality to one of fluidity.

This syntax alone, however, would be insufficient without its counterpart: prosody. If grammar is the spatial organization of food, then prosody is its rhythmic unfolding in time. The pacing of intake, the intervals between selections, the moments of pause before another bite—these are the elements of dietary music. Just as poetry relies not merely on meter but on the spaces between beats, so too does this new mode of eating depend on the pauses, the interstitial silences that punctuate the experience of nourishment. The neural network analogy becomes clear: the consumption of food, when spread over time, follows a logic not unlike the activation of a sequence of nodes, where each step influences the next without dictating it. Each piece of fruit, each sliver of cheese, is not an endpoint but a transition, leading to the next token without enforcing it.

This unfolding rhythm mirrors the very principle of GLP-1 agonists like Ozempic. The artificial regulation of satiety through pharmacology functions by dampening the spikes of hunger, by smoothing the peaks and valleys into something closer to an even wave. Yet here, in this experiment, that same effect has emerged organically, not through external intervention but through the architecture of the meal itself. The finely portioned pieces, their deliberate spacing, the absence of bulk—all of it coalesces into a self-regulating system, where satiety is not imposed but discovered. In this, there is an elegant compression of biological imperatives into aesthetic form. Just as the neural network condenses vast information into an optimally weighted model, so too does this mode of eating compress excess into balance, reweighting the very notion of indulgence until it ceases to be relevant.

The implications of this shift are profound. When food is structured in a manner that allows for organic cessation—when stopping is not a forced decision but a natural pause—the entire psychology of consumption changes. The sense of obligation dissipates. The notion of “leftovers” vanishes, because there is nothing left unfinished, only elements awaiting their turn. This is the dietary equivalent of an infinite game: no single meal is definitive, no moment of consumption is final. The board is always set, the tokens always present, awaiting engagement but never demanding it.

And so, a simple act—the slicing of food into smaller components, their distribution across a table, their presence as discrete, self-contained units—emerges as a revelation. This is the syntax of dietary choice, the prosody of nourishment, the symphony of consumption. What was once an obligation has become an art, what was once a compulsion has become a cadence. This is not just eating; this is the rhythm of sustenance, composed in space and played in time.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Suis': ['Foundational', 'Grammar', 'Syntax', 'Punctuation', "Rhythm", 'Time'],  # Static
        'Voir': ['Data Flywheel'],  
        'Choisis': ['LLM', 'User'],  
        'Deviens': ['Action', 'Token', 'Rhythm.'],  
        "M'èléve": ['Victory', 'Payoff', 'NexToken', 'Time.', 'Cadence']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Data Flywheel'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Time', 'User', 'Rhythm.', 'Cadence'],  
        'lightgreen': ["Rhythm", 'Token', 'Payoff', 'Time.', 'NexToken'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['Syntax', 'Punctuation', 'LLM', 'Action', 'Victory'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edge weights (hardcoded for editing)
def define_edges():
    return {
        ('Foundational', 'Data Flywheel'): '1/99',
        ('Grammar', 'Data Flywheel'): '5/95',
        ('Syntax', 'Data Flywheel'): '20/80',
        ('Punctuation', 'Data Flywheel'): '51/49',
        ("Rhythm", 'Data Flywheel'): '80/20',
        ('Time', 'Data Flywheel'): '95/5',
        ('Data Flywheel', 'LLM'): '20/80',
        ('Data Flywheel', 'User'): '80/20',
        ('LLM', 'Action'): '49/51',
        ('LLM', 'Token'): '80/20',
        ('LLM', 'Rhythm.'): '95/5',
        ('User', 'Action'): '5/95',
        ('User', 'Token'): '20/80',
        ('User', 'Rhythm.'): '51/49',
        ('Action', 'Victory'): '80/20',
        ('Action', 'Payoff'): '85/15',
        ('Action', 'NexToken'): '90/10',
        ('Action', 'Time.'): '95/5',
        ('Action', 'Cadence'): '99/1',
        ('Token', 'Victory'): '1/9',
        ('Token', 'Payoff'): '1/8',
        ('Token', 'NexToken'): '1/7',
        ('Token', 'Time.'): '1/6',
        ('Token', 'Cadence'): '1/5',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Victory'): '1/99',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Payoff'): '5/95',
        ('Rhythm.', 'NexToken'): '10/90',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Time.'): '15/85',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Cadence'): '20/80'
    }

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    
    # Create mapping from original node names to numbered labels
    mapping = {}
    counter = 1
    for layer in layers.values():
        for node in layer:
            mapping[node] = f"{counter}. {node}"
            counter += 1
            
    # Add nodes with new numbered labels and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            new_node = mapping[node]
            G.add_node(new_node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[new_node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))
    
    # Add edges with updated node labels
    for (source, target), weight in edges.items():
        if source in mapping and target in mapping:
            new_source = mapping[source]
            new_target = mapping[target]
            G.add_edge(new_source, new_target, weight=weight)
    
    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    edges_labels = {(u, v): d["weight"] for u, v, d in G.edges(data=True)}
    
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    nx.draw_networkx_edge_labels(G, pos, edge_labels=edges_labels, font_size=8)
    plt.title("OPRAH™", fontsize=25)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 34 While neural biology inspired neural networks in machine learning, the realization that scaling laws apply so beautifully to machine learning has led to a divergence in the process of generation of intelligence. Biology is constrained by the Red Queen, whereas mankind is quite open to destroying the Ecosystem-Cost function for the sake of generating the most powerful AI.