Resource

The most striking thing about Omar Sharif is his ability to embody timeless charisma—a quality that transcended language, culture, and even medium. Whether playing Yuri Zhivago in Dr. Zhivago, Sherif Ali in Lawrence of Arabia, or dazzling audiences at bridge tournaments and in interviews, Sharif carried an air of effortless grace that was magnetic yet unassuming. This wasn’t just about looks, although his angular features and expressive eyes certainly helped—it was his deep, understated presence that left a mark.

Duality of His Presence

1. Eastern Mystique Meets Western Sophistication: Sharif uniquely bridged worlds. Born in Egypt, speaking Arabic, English, French, and Italian, he was able to navigate Hollywood and European cinema while still maintaining his identity as an actor from the Middle East. He brought an enigmatic elegance to every role, blending exotic allure with a deeply human relatability.

2. Intensity Without Excess: In Lawrence of Arabia, his entrance—emerging from a mirage—remains one of the most iconic introductions in film history. Yet, it’s not just the staging; it’s the controlled, deliberate energy Sharif radiates. His performances were marked by restraint, letting his characters’ depth emerge through subtleties rather than grand gestures.

A Life of Contrasts

Sharif’s real-life persona was as fascinating as his on-screen characters. Here’s where his contradictions made him even more compelling:

• The Romantic Leading Man: He was adored by women worldwide, yet his greatest romance—his marriage to Faten Hamama—ended after a decade, leaving him famously lonely in later years.

• The Intellectual Gambler: While a polyglot and a scholar of bridge (he was one of the world’s top players), he also lost fortunes to gambling, living a life of excess that seemed both glamorous and tragic.

• The Star Without a Nation: As an Egyptian actor who became an international star, he represented a global citizen. Yet, in some ways, this role alienated him from his homeland, where his fame was both celebrated and critiqued.

Eternal Icon

Sharif’s legacy lies in the way he could turn stillness into power. His gaze, his posture, his voice—everything about him suggested someone who belonged not just to the screen but to the mythic realm of cinematic immortality. He wasn’t merely an actor; he was an idea of what a star could be: elegant, mysterious, and larger than life, yet deeply human.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network structure
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Pre-Input': ['Life','Earth', 'Cosmos', 'Sound', 'Tactful', 'Firm', ],
        'Yellowstone': ['Weltanschauung'],
        'Input': ['DNA', 'Heritage'],
        'Hidden': [
            'Cambridge',
            'LSE',
            'Oxford',
        ],
        'Output': ['Aristotelian', 'Antithesis', 'Synthesis', 'Thesis', 'Platonic',    ]
    }

# Define weights for the connections
def define_weights():
    return {
        'Pre-Input-Yellowstone': np.array([
            [0.6],
            [0.5],
            [0.4],
            [0.3],
            [0.7],
            [0.8],
            [0.6]
        ]),
        'Yellowstone-Input': np.array([
            [0.7, 0.8]
        ]),
        'Input-Hidden': np.array([[0.8, 0.4, 0.1], [0.9, 0.7, 0.2]]),
        'Hidden-Output': np.array([
            [0.2, 0.8, 0.1, 0.05, 0.2],
            [0.1, 0.9, 0.05, 0.05, 0.1],
            [0.05, 0.6, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05]
        ])
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors(node, layer):
    if node == 'Weltanschauung':
        return 'yellow'
    if layer == 'Pre-Input' and node in ['Sound', 'Tactful', 'Firm']:
        return 'paleturquoise'
    elif layer == 'Input' and node == 'Heritage':
        return 'paleturquoise'
    elif layer == 'Hidden':
        if node == 'Oxford':
            return 'paleturquoise'
        elif node == 'LSE':
            return 'lightgreen'
        elif node == 'Cambridge':
            return 'lightsalmon'
    elif layer == 'Output':
        if node == 'Platonic':
            return 'paleturquoise'
        elif node in ['Synthesis', 'Thesis', 'Antithesis']:
            return 'lightgreen'
        elif node == 'Aristotalian':
            return 'lightsalmon'
    return 'lightsalmon'  # Default color

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, center_x, offset):
    layer_size = len(layer)
    start_y = -(layer_size - 1) / 2  # Center the layer vertically
    return [(center_x + offset, start_y + i) for i in range(layer_size)]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    weights = define_weights()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    center_x = 0  # Align nodes horizontally

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        y_positions = calculate_positions(nodes, center_x, offset=-len(layers) + i + 1)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, y_positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(assign_colors(node, layer_name))

    # Add edges and weights
    for layer_pair, weight_matrix in zip(
        [('Pre-Input', 'Yellowstone'), ('Yellowstone', 'Input'), ('Input', 'Hidden'), ('Hidden', 'Output')],
        [weights['Pre-Input-Yellowstone'], weights['Yellowstone-Input'], weights['Input-Hidden'], weights['Hidden-Output']]
    ):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_pair
        for i, source in enumerate(layers[source_layer]):
            for j, target in enumerate(layers[target_layer]):
                weight = weight_matrix[i, j]
                G.add_edge(source, target, weight=weight)

    # Customize edge thickness for specific relationships
    edge_widths = []
    for u, v in G.edges():
        if u in layers['Hidden'] and v == 'Kapital':
            edge_widths.append(6)  # Highlight key edges
        else:
            edge_widths.append(1)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 16))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=10, width=edge_widths
    )
    edge_labels = nx.get_edge_attributes(G, 'weight')
    nx.draw_networkx_edge_labels(G, pos, edge_labels={k: f'{v:.2f}' for k, v in edge_labels.items()})
    plt.title("Monarchy (Great Britain) vs. Anarchy (United Kingdom)")
    
    # Save the figure to a file
    # plt.savefig("figures/logo.png", format="png")

    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 20 Ultimately, Nietzsche’s critique of Dawkins and Hirsi Ali is not about the validity of their arguments but about their failure to engage with the aesthetic dimensions of life. By reducing existence to ideological or biological terms, they overlook the “diet, locality, and climate” that ground human flourishing. The neural network’s layers remind us that abstraction and intellectualization must remain connected to the tangible and the experiential. Without this connection, humanity risks becoming a caricature of itself: all intellect, no substance, and entirely out of tune with the symphony of life.

Omar Sharif’s most impressive use of “the gaze” is undoubtedly in Lawrence of Arabia (1962). His entrance as Sherif Ali is one of the most iconic moments in cinematic history, and it showcases his gaze as not just a tool of performance but as a weapon of storytelling.

The Scene: Emerging from the Mirage

The sequence begins with a tiny, wavering dot in the distance—a lone figure riding across the vast desert toward the well where Lawrence and his guide wait. David Lean prolongs the moment, creating tension and awe as the figure grows steadily larger, framed by the shimmering heat of the desert. When the mirage resolves into Omar Sharif’s Sherif Ali, the power of his presence hits like a tidal wave, carried almost entirely by his eyes.

Why Is the Gaze So Striking Here?

1. Mystery and Authority: Sharif’s gaze conveys an unshakable sense of purpose. As he rides closer, his unblinking focus dominates the frame, reflecting both the authority of Sherif Ali and the alien, almost mythic quality of the desert world he inhabits.

2. Tension and Resolution: When Sherif Ali finally dismounts and confronts Lawrence after shooting his guide, Sharif’s gaze sharpens into judgment. It’s cold and piercing, embodying the moral and cultural divide between the Bedouin world and the outsider Lawrence. Yet, it is not without humanity—there’s a curiosity, even respect, lurking beneath his scrutiny.

3. Minimalism Amplified: Sharif’s face does very little in this scene—there’s no unnecessary movement, no overt emotion. His eyes do all the work, making the moment feel almost elemental. He becomes a force of nature, much like the desert itself.

Comparison to Other Films

While Sharif had other memorable moments of “the gaze”—as Yuri Zhivago looking longingly at Lara (Dr. Zhivago) or as Nicky Arnstein admiring Fanny Brice (Funny Girl)—none match the sheer cinematic weight of his first appearance in Lawrence of Arabia. Here, his gaze doesn’t just express emotion; it defines his character and establishes his place within the epic narrative.

Conclusion

Sharif’s gaze in Lawrence of Arabia is a masterclass in the art of screen presence. It’s not just about looking—it’s about commanding, questioning, and defining a scene without saying a single word. This moment cements Sharif as an eternal figure in cinema, his eyes capturing the vast, timeless spirit of the desert and the complexities of the man he portrays.

Gaze

You’re absolutely right—Omar Sharif’s gaze in Dr. Zhivago achieves something entirely different, and arguably more profound, than his commanding presence in Lawrence of Arabia. In Zhivago, his gaze isn’t just an expression of longing or thought—it becomes a portal into the character’s internal fragmentation, his detachment from the present, and his quiet surrender to the weight of fate. It’s a gaze steeped in melancholy, absence, and the haunting awareness of life slipping away, moment by moment.

The Vacant Gaze: A Window to the Soul

What makes his gaze so striking in Dr. Zhivago is its emptiness. Yuri doesn’t just look at the world—he looks past it, as if searching for something unreachable:

1. The Gaze of a Dreamer: Zhivago is a poet trapped in the brutal machinery of history. His gaze often seems to drift, lost in a world of beauty and memory that exists only in his mind. When he looks out a window or into the snowy expanse, it’s not just scenery—he’s confronting the gap between the life he’s living and the life he wishes he could lead.

2. Detachment from the Present: In the presence of his wife, Tonya, his gaze reveals the quiet tragedy of a man emotionally absent from the stability she represents. Even when physically with her, he’s already elsewhere—in his thoughts, his poetry, or his unspoken longing for Lara. The contrast between Tonya’s steadfast presence and Yuri’s wandering eyes captures the essence of his disconnection.

3. The Gaze as Unspoken Grief: Later, when he’s with Lara, his gaze takes on a similar quality, not of satisfaction but of quiet resignation. Even in his most intimate moments, there’s a haunting awareness that their love is fleeting, that the forces of history will inevitably pull them apart. It’s not just love—it’s love marked by futility.

Moments of the Gaze

• At the Window with Tonya: Yuri stares out at the Russian winter, his gaze soft but impenetrable. It’s not just a gaze of physical distance but of emotional exile—a man in love with the idea of something he cannot name.

• In Lara’s Presence: Even as he holds Lara, his gaze often drifts. This isn’t a lack of passion but a deep awareness that even the most profound connection cannot escape the tides of time and war.

Why This Gaze Resonates

The brilliance of Sharif’s performance lies in how he imbues emptiness with meaning. The vacuity isn’t just blankness—it’s a canvas for the audience to project their understanding of Zhivago’s inner turmoil:

• Universal Alienation: His gaze mirrors the feeling of being physically present in the world but emotionally disconnected, a theme that resonates deeply in modern times.

• Beauty Amid Chaos: Sharif’s gaze captures Zhivago’s ability to find fleeting beauty in the midst of destruction, a poet’s tragedy in a time that has no use for poetry.

Conclusion

If Lawrence of Arabia gave us a gaze that commanded and defined, Dr. Zhivago offers a gaze that dissolves and invites. It’s the gaze of a man caught in the liminal space between duty and desire, between the personal and the historical. Sharif’s ability to convey this quiet devastation, particularly in the presence of those he loves but cannot fully connect with, is what makes his performance unforgettable. His gaze becomes a meditation on loss, longing, and the fragility of human connection—a truly timeless achievement.