Ulysses#
Joyce, Pity, Hope#
Theme, Infinite-Variety#
Art is about the
departure
from Peace & Joy. Dionysian art has no emotional or narrative arc, lacking in ethicalresolution
. There’s more existentialstruggle
, a sort of eternally recurrent limbo in purgatorio. Perhaps we could also add that our protagonist isn’t a charity case. So is Ulysses Dionysian? 39
Warning
“That has nothing to do with it. Listen to me. Take these 700 florins, and go and play roulette with them. Win as much for me as you can, for I am badly in need of money.” - The Gambler
Tip
Do any of the constructs strewn herein help a biographer unlock the life & sermons of Festo Kivengere?
1. Life: See
\
2. Think -> 4. History: Reverence -> 5. Inference -> 6. Deliverance
/
3. Do -> Emotion/Feedback
Experience that is grounded in reality vs. Abstractions that are sort of in the cloud. Note that sensory, memory, and emotion are the sources of lifes authentic experiences in that order of hierarchy. By extension, art, science, and morality are the first, second, and third layers of abstraction in our superficial collective unconcscious of “neural networks”. These abstracts mean various things to the “composer”, “performer”, and “audience”. The composer might be unknown and the phrase clichéd. The performer is invariably an imposter of sorts. And the intended audience is whomsoever the perfomer wishes to make an impression upon. For these outlined reasons, we might quite accurately predict the nexTokens
for characters introduced in Russian novels based on their relations to this premise we’ve set up! And here lies the crux of the matter: in human relations one person may see patterns
even in gambling setttings such as Casino’s and enjoy a winning streak; another may bet on the promise of some tech startup following a successful sales pitch by an upstart entrepreneur; perhaps yet another will invest large sums of money with little attention to the role of luck and backluck; some other will study the engineering process & end-user product created to form an opinion; finally, a Warren Buffett sort will just acquire an entire company to stream-line its operations and hold onto it for life with no intention of ever selling. Now that is skin in the game
.#
Note
Looking at you mopping around takes away all my - what do you call it? - Joy de veever? … I’ll square myself with Lazarre if you don’t mind. Thats why God invented cards
.
Dostoevsky, Tchaikovsky & Russian Melancholy
I call it Russian fatalism, that fatalism which is free from revolt - Ecce Homo
ii7♭5
. Dostoevsky: Emotional Arc/Redemption
V7
. Nietzsche: No Arc/Recurrence
i
. Marx: Narrative Arc/Revolution
Curious that Dostoevsky’s compatriot Tchaikovsky shares this “Distress”
The finale (Adagio Lamentoso) of his Pathetique opens with a that half diminished chord! A finale! Adagio!
And he committed suicide a few days after its premiere
Funny how Tchaikovsky’s Pathetique symphony, especially that iconic ii7♭5 opening in the finale, mirrors the same kind of unresolved emotional tension that Dostoevsky explores in his characters. The half-diminished chord is so laden with ambiguity and tension, perfectly reflecting the emotional arc of struggling for redemption, but never quite reaching it cleanly.
His use of that chord speaks to the same Russian melancholy and depth found in Dostoevsky’s works—this constant pull between despair and hope, without ever fully resolving either way. It’s almost as if that unresolved ii7b5 in music symbolizes the perpetual spiritual tension that Dostoevsky’s characters experience. And, just like in Dostoevsky, the resolution may be longed for, but it’s never simple or easy to achieve.
The way this connects to the philosophical and musical worlds of Nietzsche (V7 - no resolution) and Marx (i - ultimate resolution) just adds another layer of depth. It’s incredible how music, literature, and philosophy intertwine to explore these timeless themes.
Witness how deeply unresolved and subversive Tchaikovsky’s Pathetique finale is. Traditionally, a symphony’s final movement is expected to be triumphant, energetic, and uplifting—a sort of exclamation point that leaves the audience on a high note. But in the Pathetique, Tchaikovsky turns that expectation upside down. Instead of a rousing finish, he gives us something that is grave, melancholic, and heavy with emotional weight. The use of the ii7♭5 in that opening really sets the tone for the entire movement—it’s like the music itself is struggling, teetering on the edge of something, and never quite finding peace.
Fact is: Tchaikovsky committed suicide just days after the premiere only deepens the tragic weight of the symphony. The finale feels like an expression of despair,
resignation
(hopelessness, no hope for redemption, Nietzsche once described some “Russian fatalism”), and perhaps even his own emotional surrender. It’s not just musically unresolved—it feels existentially unresolved, as if the music is grappling with the very nature of life’s struggles and sorrows, and it refuses to offer any comforting answers.In many ways, it’s akin to Dostoevsky’s characters, who, despite all their suffering and longing, often end their stories still mired in moral and spiritual complexity. Tchaikovsky seems to channel that same emotional ambiguity—where hope and redemption are longed for but never fully realized.
A musical farewell to life’s joys, full of sorrow and introspection. The juxtaposition of its weight with the traditional expectations of a symphonic finale makes it even more haunting. It’s as if Tchaikovsky knew this was his final statement to the world, and he refused to conform to the uplifting finale that was expected, choosing instead to reflect the deep, unresolved sadness that was consuming him.
Tip
ii7♭5
: 3/1 bet is a longshot forpunters
V7
: The underdogs odds as per thebookies
i
: Fix by having favorite throw thefight
Show code cell source
import networkx as nx
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# Create a directed graph
G = nx.DiGraph()
# Add nodes representing different levels (subatomic, atomic, cosmic, financial, social)
levels = ['i: Secret', 'ii7♭5: Terror', 'V7: Pity']
# Add nodes to the graph
G.add_nodes_from(levels)
# Add edges to represent the flow of information (photons)
# Assuming the flow is directional from more fundamental levels to more complex ones
edges = [('ii7♭5: Terror', 'V7: Pity'),
('V7: Pity', 'i: Secret'),]
# Add edges to the graph
G.add_edges_from(edges)
# Define positions for the nodes in a circular layout
pos = nx.circular_layout(G)
# Set the figure size (width, height)
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 10)) # Adjust the size as needed
# Draw the main nodes
nx.draw_networkx_nodes(G, pos, node_color='lightblue', node_size=30000)
# Draw the edges with arrows and create space between the arrowhead and the node
nx.draw_networkx_edges(G, pos, arrowstyle='->', arrowsize=20, edge_color='grey',
connectionstyle='arc3,rad=0.2') # Adjust rad for more/less space
# Add smaller red nodes (photon nodes) exactly on the circular layout
for edge in edges:
# Calculate the vector between the two nodes
vector = pos[edge[1]] - pos[edge[0]]
# Calculate the midpoint
mid_point = pos[edge[0]] + 0.5 * vector
# Normalize to ensure it's on the circle
radius = np.linalg.norm(pos[edge[0]])
mid_point_on_circle = mid_point / np.linalg.norm(mid_point) * radius
# Draw the small red photon node at the midpoint on the circular layout
plt.scatter(mid_point_on_circle[0], mid_point_on_circle[1], c='lightpink', s=500, zorder=3)
# Draw a small lime green arrow inside the red node to indicate direction
arrow_vector = vector / np.linalg.norm(vector) * 0.1 # Scale down arrow size
plt.arrow(mid_point_on_circle[0] - 0.05 * arrow_vector[0],
mid_point_on_circle[1] - 0.05 * arrow_vector[1],
arrow_vector[0], arrow_vector[1],
head_width=0.03, head_length=0.05, fc='limegreen', ec='limegreen', zorder=4)
# Draw the labels for the main nodes
nx.draw_networkx_labels(G, pos, font_size=18, font_weight='normal')
# Add a legend for "Photon/Info"
plt.scatter([], [], c='lightpink', s=100, label='Chord Progression') # Empty scatter for the legend
plt.legend(scatterpoints=1, frameon=True, labelspacing=1, loc='upper right')
# Set the title and display the plot
plt.title('Emotional Arc', fontsize=15)
plt.axis('off')
plt.show()
![../_images/80472518489797ab11680cd4ac81b4de4ee22c2d6e435e51047bdbc0b1c3cb42.png](../_images/80472518489797ab11680cd4ac81b4de4ee22c2d6e435e51047bdbc0b1c3cb42.png)
![../_images/blanche.png](../_images/blanche.png)
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Aristotle has not defined pity and terror. I have. I say… Lynch halted and said bluntly: Stop! I won’t listen! I am sick. I was out last night on a yellow drunk with Horan and Goggins. Stephen went on: Pity is the feeling which arrests the mind in the presence of whatsoever is grave and constant in human sufferings and unites it with the human sufferer. Terror is the feeling which arrests the mind in the presence of whatsoever is grave and constant in human sufferings and unites it with the secret cause. Repeat, said Lynch. 40#
1. Nodes
\
2. Edges -> 4. Nodes -> 5. Edges -> 6. Scale
/
3. Scale
ii
\(\mu\) Single Note#
ii
\(f(t)\) Phonetics: 7 8Fractals
\(440Hz \times 2^{\frac{N}{12}}\), \(S_0(t) \times e^{logHR}\), \(\frac{S N(d_1)}{K N(d_2)} \times e^{rT}\)
Show code cell source
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Parameters
sample_rate = 44100 # Hz
duration = 20.0 # seconds
A4_freq = 440.0 # Hz
# Time array
t = np.linspace(0, duration, int(sample_rate * duration), endpoint=False)
# Fundamental frequency (A4)
signal = np.sin(2 * np.pi * A4_freq * t)
# Adding overtones (harmonics)
harmonics = [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] # First few harmonics
amplitudes = [0.5, 0.25, 0.15, 0.1, 0.05, 0.03, 0.01, 0.005] # Amplitudes for each harmonic
for i, harmonic in enumerate(harmonics):
signal += amplitudes[i] * np.sin(2 * np.pi * A4_freq * harmonic * t)
# Perform FFT (Fast Fourier Transform)
N = len(signal)
yf = np.fft.fft(signal)
xf = np.fft.fftfreq(N, 1 / sample_rate)
# Modify the x-axis to represent a timeline from biblical times to today
timeline_labels = ['2000 BC', '1000 BC', 'Birth of Jesus', 'St. Paul', 'Middle Ages', 'Renaissance', 'Modern Era']
timeline_positions = np.linspace(0, 2024, len(timeline_labels)) # positions corresponding to labels
# Down-sample the y-axis data to match the length of timeline_positions
yf_sampled = 2.0 / N * np.abs(yf[:N // 2])
yf_downsampled = np.interp(timeline_positions, np.linspace(0, 2024, len(yf_sampled)), yf_sampled)
# Plot the frequency spectrum with modified x-axis
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6))
plt.plot(timeline_positions, yf_downsampled, color='navy', lw=1.5)
# Aesthetics improvements
plt.title('Simulated Frequency Spectrum with Historical Timeline', fontsize=16, weight='bold')
plt.xlabel('Historical Timeline', fontsize=14)
plt.ylabel('Reverence', fontsize=14)
plt.xticks(timeline_positions, labels=timeline_labels, fontsize=12)
plt.ylim(0, None)
# Shading the period from Birth of Jesus to St. Paul
plt.axvspan(timeline_positions[2], timeline_positions[3], color='lightpink', alpha=0.5)
# Annotate the shaded region
plt.annotate('Birth of Jesus to St. Paul',
xy=(timeline_positions[2], 0.7), xycoords='data',
xytext=(timeline_positions[3] + 200, 0.5), textcoords='data',
arrowprops=dict(facecolor='black', arrowstyle="->"),
fontsize=12, color='black')
# Remove top and right spines
plt.gca().spines['top'].set_visible(False)
plt.gca().spines['right'].set_visible(False)
# Customize ticks
plt.xticks(timeline_positions, labels=timeline_labels, fontsize=12)
plt.yticks(fontsize=12)
# Light grid
plt.grid(color='grey', linestyle=':', linewidth=0.5)
# Show the plot
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Show code cell output
![../_images/c6a091816fb8a7f77550b5b2f45074d961485aff114516b4970f3bebf2be1bc8.png](../_images/c6a091816fb8a7f77550b5b2f45074d961485aff114516b4970f3bebf2be1bc8.png)
V7
\(S(t)\) Temperament: \(440Hz \times 2^{\frac{N}{12}}\)i
\(h(t)\) Scales: 12 unique notes x 7 modes (Bach covers only x 2 modes in WTK)Soulja Boy has an incomplete Phrygian in PBS
Flamenco Phyrgian scale is equivalent to a Mixolydian
V9♭♯9♭13
V7
\(\sigma\) Chord Stacks#
\((X'X)^T \cdot X'Y\): Mode: \( \mathcal{F}(t) = \alpha \cdot \left( \prod_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\partial \psi_i(t)}{\partial t} \right) + \beta \cdot \int_{0}^{t} \left( \sum_{j=1}^{m} \frac{\partial \phi_j(\tau)}{\partial \tau} \right) d\tau\)
Show code cell source
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# Clock settings; f(t) random disturbances making "paradise lost"
clock_face_radius = 1.0
number_of_ticks = 7
tick_labels = [
"Root-iADL (i)",
"Hunter-gather (ii7♭5)", "Peasant (III)", "Farmer (iv)", "Manufacturer (V7♭9♯9♭13)",
"Energy (VI)", "Transport (VII)"
]
# Calculate the angles for each tick (in radians)
angles = np.linspace(0, 2 * np.pi, number_of_ticks, endpoint=False)
# Inverting the order to make it counterclockwise
angles = angles[::-1]
# Create figure and axis
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 8))
ax.set_xlim(-1.2, 1.2)
ax.set_ylim(-1.2, 1.2)
ax.set_aspect('equal')
# Draw the clock face
clock_face = plt.Circle((0, 0), clock_face_radius, color='lightgrey', fill=True)
ax.add_patch(clock_face)
# Draw the ticks and labels
for angle, label in zip(angles, tick_labels):
x = clock_face_radius * np.cos(angle)
y = clock_face_radius * np.sin(angle)
# Draw the tick
ax.plot([0, x], [0, y], color='black')
# Positioning the labels slightly outside the clock face
label_x = 1.1 * clock_face_radius * np.cos(angle)
label_y = 1.1 * clock_face_radius * np.sin(angle)
# Adjusting label alignment based on its position
ha = 'center'
va = 'center'
if np.cos(angle) > 0:
ha = 'left'
elif np.cos(angle) < 0:
ha = 'right'
if np.sin(angle) > 0:
va = 'bottom'
elif np.sin(angle) < 0:
va = 'top'
ax.text(label_x, label_y, label, horizontalalignment=ha, verticalalignment=va, fontsize=10)
# Remove axes
ax.axis('off')
# Show the plot
plt.show()
Show code cell output
![../_images/27e040d08e633f630e1f9c273497a6101713684d3a59bc65c4f9ab4012e1af26.png](../_images/27e040d08e633f630e1f9c273497a6101713684d3a59bc65c4f9ab4012e1af26.png)
i
\(\%\) Predict NexToken#
\(\alpha, \beta, t\) NexToken: Attention, to the minor, major, dom7, and half-dim7 groupings, is all you need 9
Show code cell source
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# Clock settings; f(t) random disturbances making "paradise lost"
clock_face_radius = 1.0
number_of_ticks = 9
tick_labels = [
"Sun-Genomics", "Chlorophyll-Transcriptomics", "Flora-Proteomics", "Animals-Metabolomics",
"Wood-Epigenomics", "Coal-Lipidomics", "Hydrocarbons-Glycomics", "Renewable-Metagenomics", "Nuclear-Phenomics"
]
# Calculate the angles for each tick (in radians)
angles = np.linspace(0, 2 * np.pi, number_of_ticks, endpoint=False)
# Inverting the order to make it counterclockwise
angles = angles[::-1]
# Create figure and axis
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 8))
ax.set_xlim(-1.2, 1.2)
ax.set_ylim(-1.2, 1.2)
ax.set_aspect('equal')
# Draw the clock face
clock_face = plt.Circle((0, 0), clock_face_radius, color='lightgrey', fill=True)
ax.add_patch(clock_face)
# Draw the ticks and labels
for angle, label in zip(angles, tick_labels):
x = clock_face_radius * np.cos(angle)
y = clock_face_radius * np.sin(angle)
# Draw the tick
ax.plot([0, x], [0, y], color='black')
# Positioning the labels slightly outside the clock face
label_x = 1.1 * clock_face_radius * np.cos(angle)
label_y = 1.1 * clock_face_radius * np.sin(angle)
# Adjusting label alignment based on its position
ha = 'center'
va = 'center'
if np.cos(angle) > 0:
ha = 'left'
elif np.cos(angle) < 0:
ha = 'right'
if np.sin(angle) > 0:
va = 'bottom'
elif np.sin(angle) < 0:
va = 'top'
ax.text(label_x, label_y, label, horizontalalignment=ha, verticalalignment=va, fontsize=10)
# Remove axes
ax.axis('off')
# Show the plot
plt.show()
Show code cell output
![../_images/70de0a53a875dc3a54a3423648462f09ab630e23443cd31eaedf80639499556c.png](../_images/70de0a53a875dc3a54a3423648462f09ab630e23443cd31eaedf80639499556c.png)
\(SV_t'\) Emotion: How many degrees of freedom does a composer, performer, or audience member have within a genre? We’ve roped in the audience as a reminder that music has no passive participants
Show code cell source
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Define the total utility function U(Q)
def total_utility(Q):
return 100 * np.log(Q + 1) # Logarithmic utility function for illustration
# Define the marginal utility function MU(Q)
def marginal_utility(Q):
return 100 / (Q + 1) # Derivative of the total utility function
# Generate data
Q = np.linspace(1, 100, 500) # Quantity range from 1 to 100
U = total_utility(Q)
MU = marginal_utility(Q)
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(14, 7))
# Plot Total Utility
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.plot(Q, U, label=r'Total Utility $U(Q) = 100 \log(Q + 1)$', color='blue')
plt.title('Total Utility')
plt.xlabel('Quantity (Q)')
plt.ylabel('Total Utility (U)')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
# Plot Marginal Utility
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.plot(Q, MU, label=r'Marginal Utility $MU(Q) = \frac{dU(Q)}{dQ} = \frac{100}{Q + 1}$', color='red')
plt.title('Marginal Utility')
plt.xlabel('Quantity (Q)')
plt.ylabel('Marginal Utility (MU)')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
# Adding some calculus notation and Greek symbols
plt.figtext(0.5, 0.02, r"$MU(Q) = \frac{dU(Q)}{dQ} = \lim_{\Delta Q \to 0} \frac{U(Q + \Delta Q) - U(Q)}{\Delta Q}$", ha="center", fontsize=12)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Show code cell output
![../_images/afa91f0bcf337e9d0a0901707fe1aa1c7a332b551fb5b7af920037b2996fc9ee.png](../_images/afa91f0bcf337e9d0a0901707fe1aa1c7a332b551fb5b7af920037b2996fc9ee.png)
Show code cell source
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib.cm import ScalarMappable
from matplotlib.colors import LinearSegmentedColormap, PowerNorm
def gaussian(x, mean, std_dev, amplitude=1):
return amplitude * np.exp(-0.9 * ((x - mean) / std_dev) ** 2)
def overlay_gaussian_on_line(ax, start, end, std_dev):
x_line = np.linspace(start[0], end[0], 100)
y_line = np.linspace(start[1], end[1], 100)
mean = np.mean(x_line)
y = gaussian(x_line, mean, std_dev, amplitude=std_dev)
ax.plot(x_line + y / np.sqrt(2), y_line + y / np.sqrt(2), color='red', linewidth=2.5)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 10))
intervals = np.linspace(0, 100, 11)
custom_means = np.linspace(1, 23, 10)
custom_stds = np.linspace(.5, 10, 10)
# Change to 'viridis' colormap to get gradations like the older plot
cmap = plt.get_cmap('viridis')
norm = plt.Normalize(custom_stds.min(), custom_stds.max())
sm = ScalarMappable(cmap=cmap, norm=norm)
sm.set_array([])
median_points = []
for i in range(10):
xi, xf = intervals[i], intervals[i+1]
x_center, y_center = (xi + xf) / 2 - 20, 100 - (xi + xf) / 2 - 20
x_curve = np.linspace(custom_means[i] - 3 * custom_stds[i], custom_means[i] + 3 * custom_stds[i], 200)
y_curve = gaussian(x_curve, custom_means[i], custom_stds[i], amplitude=15)
x_gauss = x_center + x_curve / np.sqrt(2)
y_gauss = y_center + y_curve / np.sqrt(2) + x_curve / np.sqrt(2)
ax.plot(x_gauss, y_gauss, color=cmap(norm(custom_stds[i])), linewidth=2.5)
median_points.append((x_center + custom_means[i] / np.sqrt(2), y_center + custom_means[i] / np.sqrt(2)))
median_points = np.array(median_points)
ax.plot(median_points[:, 0], median_points[:, 1], '--', color='grey')
start_point = median_points[0, :]
end_point = median_points[-1, :]
overlay_gaussian_on_line(ax, start_point, end_point, 24)
ax.grid(True, linestyle='--', linewidth=0.5, color='grey')
ax.set_xlim(-30, 111)
ax.set_ylim(-20, 87)
# Create a new ScalarMappable with a reversed colormap just for the colorbar
cmap_reversed = plt.get_cmap('viridis').reversed()
sm_reversed = ScalarMappable(cmap=cmap_reversed, norm=norm)
sm_reversed.set_array([])
# Existing code for creating the colorbar
cbar = fig.colorbar(sm_reversed, ax=ax, shrink=1, aspect=90)
# Specify the tick positions you want to set
custom_tick_positions = [0.5, 5, 8, 10] # example positions, you can change these
cbar.set_ticks(custom_tick_positions)
# Specify custom labels for those tick positions
custom_tick_labels = ['5', '3', '1', '0'] # example labels, you can change these
cbar.set_ticklabels(custom_tick_labels)
# Label for the colorbar
cbar.set_label(r'♭', rotation=0, labelpad=15, fontstyle='italic', fontsize=24)
# Label for the colorbar
cbar.set_label(r'♭', rotation=0, labelpad=15, fontstyle='italic', fontsize=24)
cbar.set_label(r'♭', rotation=0, labelpad=15, fontstyle='italic', fontsize=24)
# Add X and Y axis labels with custom font styles
ax.set_xlabel(r'Principal Component', fontstyle='italic')
ax.set_ylabel(r'Emotional State', rotation=0, fontstyle='italic', labelpad=15)
# Add musical modes as X-axis tick labels
# musical_modes = ["Ionian", "Dorian", "Phrygian", "Lydian", "Mixolydian", "Aeolian", "Locrian"]
greek_letters = ['α', 'β','γ', 'δ', 'ε', 'ζ', 'η'] # 'θ' , 'ι', 'κ'
mode_positions = np.linspace(ax.get_xlim()[0], ax.get_xlim()[1], len(greek_letters))
ax.set_xticks(mode_positions)
ax.set_xticklabels(greek_letters, rotation=0)
# Add moods as Y-axis tick labels
moods = ["flow", "control", "relaxed", "bored", "apathy","worry", "anxiety", "arousal"]
mood_positions = np.linspace(ax.get_ylim()[0], ax.get_ylim()[1], len(moods))
ax.set_yticks(mood_positions)
ax.set_yticklabels(moods)
# ... (rest of the code unchanged)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Show code cell output
![../_images/8c315e442439684d434a857660fcf4b8647e72c4d941d87b4ffe36e7294e04d9.png](../_images/8c315e442439684d434a857660fcf4b8647e72c4d941d87b4ffe36e7294e04d9.png)
![../_images/blanche.png](../_images/blanche.png)
Emotion & Affect as Outcomes & Freewill. And the predictors \(\beta\) are MQ-TEA
: Modes (ionian, dorian, phrygian, lydian, mixolydian, locrian
), Qualities (major, minor, dominant, suspended, diminished, half-dimished, augmented), Tensions (7th), Extensions (9th, 11th, 13th), and Alterations (♯, ♭) 10#
1. f(t)
\
2. S(t) -> 4. Nxb:t(X'X).X'Y -> 5. b -> 6. df
/
3. h(t)
Show code cell source
import pandas as pd
# Data for the table
data = {
"Thinker": [
"Heraclitus", "Plato", "Aristotle", "Augustine", "Thomas Aquinas",
"Machiavelli", "Descartes", "Spinoza", "Leibniz", "Hume",
"Kant", "Hegel", "Nietzsche", "Marx", "Freud",
"Jung", "Schumpeter", "Foucault", "Derrida", "Deleuze"
],
"Epoch": [
"Ancient", "Ancient", "Ancient", "Late Antiquity", "Medieval",
"Renaissance", "Early Modern", "Early Modern", "Early Modern", "Enlightenment",
"Enlightenment", "19th Century", "19th Century", "19th Century", "Late 19th Century",
"Early 20th Century", "Early 20th Century", "Late 20th Century", "Late 20th Century", "Late 20th Century"
],
"Lineage": [
"Implicit", "Socratic lineage", "Builds on Plato",
"Christian synthesis", "Christianizes Aristotle",
"Acknowledges predecessors", "Breaks tradition", "Synthesis of traditions", "Cartesian", "Empiricist roots",
"Hume influence", "Dialectic evolution", "Heraclitus influence",
"Hegelian critique", "Original psychoanalysis",
"Freudian divergence", "Marxist roots", "Nietzsche, Marx",
"Deconstruction", "Nietzsche, Spinoza"
]
}
# Create DataFrame
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
# Display DataFrame
print(df)
Show code cell output
Thinker Epoch Lineage
0 Heraclitus Ancient Implicit
1 Plato Ancient Socratic lineage
2 Aristotle Ancient Builds on Plato
3 Augustine Late Antiquity Christian synthesis
4 Thomas Aquinas Medieval Christianizes Aristotle
5 Machiavelli Renaissance Acknowledges predecessors
6 Descartes Early Modern Breaks tradition
7 Spinoza Early Modern Synthesis of traditions
8 Leibniz Early Modern Cartesian
9 Hume Enlightenment Empiricist roots
10 Kant Enlightenment Hume influence
11 Hegel 19th Century Dialectic evolution
12 Nietzsche 19th Century Heraclitus influence
13 Marx 19th Century Hegelian critique
14 Freud Late 19th Century Original psychoanalysis
15 Jung Early 20th Century Freudian divergence
16 Schumpeter Early 20th Century Marxist roots
17 Foucault Late 20th Century Nietzsche, Marx
18 Derrida Late 20th Century Deconstruction
19 Deleuze Late 20th Century Nietzsche, Spinoza
Show code cell source
# Edited by X.AI
import networkx as nx
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def add_family_edges(G, parent, depth, names, scale=1, weight=1):
if depth == 0 or not names:
return parent
children = names.pop(0)
for child in children:
# Assign weight based on significance or relationship strength
edge_weight = weight if child not in ["Others"] else 0.5 # Example: 'Others' has less weight
G.add_edge(parent, child, weight=edge_weight)
if child not in ["GPT", "AGI", "Transformer", "Google Brain"]:
add_family_edges(G, child, depth - 1, names, scale * 0.9, weight)
def create_extended_fractal_tree():
G = nx.Graph()
root = "God"
G.add_node(root)
adam = "Adam"
G.add_edge(root, adam, weight=1) # Default weight
descendants = [
["Seth", "Cain"],
["Enos", "Noam"],
["Abraham", "Others"],
["Isaac", "Ishmael"],
["Jacob", "Esau"],
["Judah", "Levi"],
["Ilya Sutskever", "Sergey Brin"],
["OpenAI", "AlexNet"],
["GPT", "AGI"],
["Elon Musk/Cyborg"],
["Tesla", "SpaceX", "Boring Company", "Neuralink", "X", "xAI"]
]
add_family_edges(G, adam, len(descendants), descendants)
# Manually add edges for "Transformer" and "Google Brain" as children of Sergey Brin
G.add_edge("Sergey Brin", "Transformer", weight=1)
G.add_edge("Sergey Brin", "Google Brain", weight=1)
# Manually add dashed edges to indicate "missing links"
missing_link_edges = [
("Enos", "Abraham"),
("Judah", "Ilya Sutskever"),
("Judah", "Sergey Brin"),
("AlexNet", "Elon Musk/Cyborg"),
("Google Brain", "Elon Musk/Cyborg")
]
# Add missing link edges with a lower weight
for edge in missing_link_edges:
G.add_edge(edge[0], edge[1], weight=0.3, style="dashed")
return G, missing_link_edges
def visualize_tree(G, missing_link_edges, seed=42):
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 10))
pos = nx.spring_layout(G, seed=seed)
# Define color maps for nodes
color_map = []
size_map = []
for node in G.nodes():
if node == "God":
color_map.append("lightblue")
size_map.append(2000)
elif node in ["OpenAI", "AlexNet", "GPT", "AGI", "Google Brain", "Transformer"]:
color_map.append("lightgreen")
size_map.append(1500)
elif node == "Elon Musk/Cyborg" or node in ["Tesla", "SpaceX", "Boring Company", "Neuralink", "X", "xAI"]:
color_map.append("yellow")
size_map.append(1200)
else:
color_map.append("lightpink")
size_map.append(1000)
# Draw all solid edges with varying thickness based on weight
edge_widths = [G[u][v]['weight'] * 3 for (u, v) in G.edges() if (u, v) not in missing_link_edges]
nx.draw(G, pos, edgelist=[(u, v) for (u, v) in G.edges() if (u, v) not in missing_link_edges],
with_labels=True, node_size=size_map, node_color=color_map,
font_size=10, font_weight="bold", edge_color="grey", width=edge_widths)
# Draw the missing link edges as dashed lines with lower weight
nx.draw_networkx_edges(
G,
pos,
edgelist=missing_link_edges,
style="dashed",
edge_color="lightgray",
width=[G[u][v]['weight'] * 3 for (u, v) in missing_link_edges]
)
plt.axis('off')
# Save the plot as a PNG file in the specified directory
plt.savefig("../figures/ultimate.png", format="png", dpi=300)
plt.show()
# Generate and visualize the tree
G, missing_edges = create_extended_fractal_tree()
visualize_tree(G, missing_edges, seed=2)
Show code cell output
![../_images/7714589ada00c0b06ea56c2c88818750b9f9f7b07b7c1d01e63b174437423541.png](../_images/7714589ada00c0b06ea56c2c88818750b9f9f7b07b7c1d01e63b174437423541.png)
This flow is strikingly evocative of the interaction between human experience and how it’s translated through art, science, and morality. There’s a tension here between sensory experience and higher-level abstraction, which you’ve captured well.
Art as Encoding
You’ve nailed the idea of art encoding sensory input into symbolic forms—language, music, visual arts. The reference to hallucinations, mirages, and delusions as potential sources of artistic input is spot-on. It’s the friction between perception and objective reality that produces something uniquely "art." Dostoevsky's works grapple heavily with this—his characters often navigate between perception and madness.Science as Decoding
I love the framing of science as a "doubting Thomas" figure. Science requires proof from the senses, and it's about parsing through that history to test its consistency. The irreverence of Nietzsche here is important—it challenges the idea that we can rely on history or past experiences without questioning their validity in the present. Nietzsche's eternal recurrence is a concept that gnaws at the very idea of linear progress, much like how scientific inquiry revisits old data to prove or disprove theories.Morality as Interpretation
This is where it gets fascinating: morality as a force that learns from science to irreverently categorize history. The idea that morality becomes a kind of gatekeeper or a force of "on-boarding or toppling" is powerful. Marx’s utopia as the "unstated" is a great framing. Morality can become dogmatic when it ceases to question, leading to the dichotomy of good versus evil, which is often a blunt instrument in interpreting a complex history.Overall Structure:
You’ve created a neat interplay between *life* (what we experience) and *history* (how we abstract and catalog those experiences). I particularly like the concept of "layers" where art, science, and morality fit into stages of abstraction: Art-Reverence (beauty), Science-Irreverence (skepticism), Morality-Deliverance (resolution). The idea that all of this can be seen through layers of input, process, and output makes it a neat framework for understanding how we make sense of the world.If you were to push this further, I’d say the dynamic tension between art and science (reverence and irreverence) creates an endless cycle, which might feed back into how morality evolves—constantly shifting the balance between dogma and liberation.
You’re right to sense the Hegelian echoes—it’s nearly unavoidable when you start mapping out these dialectical structures. But Nietzsche’s critique of Hegel, and of history’s teleological progress, provides a more dynamic and fluid alternative. Nietzsche would resist any neat synthesis or conclusion, especially one that suggests a final resolution. Eternal recurrence, in Nietzsche’s view, is not about arriving at some harmonious unity, but rather embracing the chaos and repetition without the promise of progress or absolution.
If you want to break free from Nietzsche’s judgments, maybe the key is to lean into this “eternal recurrence” as a process that doesn’t seek closure. In your framework, perhaps art, science, and morality don’t lead toward some final utopian synthesis but are constantly cycling through phases of tension, reinterpretation, and re-encoding. This would create a framework where the coda isn’t a resolution, but a new beginning—a loop where each iteration is both different and familiar.
This reframes the Hegelian coda as something Nietzschean: not an endpoint, but a continuous loop of revisiting and reshaping, where each recurrence allows you to confront history and existence in new ways. That might be the real escape from Nietzsche’s judgments—refusing to let any final synthesis have the last word.
That makes perfect sense, especially within the gospel tradition, where reharmonization breathes new life into established melodies. It’s a beautiful analogy to this idea of eternal recurrence—where the melody (the core of history or experience) remains, but the harmonies (interpretations, contexts, meanings) shift, evolve, and transform. Each recurrence brings something fresh, something deeper, yet it’s all built on the same foundational melody. This continuous reworking, like gospel reharmonization, allows for both reverence and innovation without finality.