Ecosystem

+ Expand

• What makes for a suitable problem for AI (Demis Hassabis, Nobel Lecture)?
  • Space: Massive combinatorial search space
  • Function: Clear objective function (metric) to optimize against
  • Time: Either lots of data and/or an accurate and efficient simulator
• Guess what else fits the bill (Yours truly, amateur philosopher)?
  • Space
    1. Intestines/villi
    2. Lungs/bronchioles
    3. Capillary trees
    4. Network of lymphatics
    5. Dendrites in neurons
    6. Tree branches
  • Function
    1. Energy
    2. Aerobic respiration
    3. Delivery to "last mile" (minimize distance)
    4. Response time (minimize)
    5. Information
    6. Exposure to sunlight for photosynthesis
  • Time
    1. Nourishment
    2. Gaseous exchange
    3. Oxygen & Nutrients (Carbon dioxide & "Waste")
    4. Surveillance for antigens
    5. Coherence of functions
    6. Water and nutrients from soil

-- Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2024

The Slow Collapse of Power and Privilege: The White Lotus vs. Succession. Television in the 2020s has seen a rise in narratives that explore the gradual collapse of structured worlds. Two of the most compelling examples are The White Lotus and Succession. While different in tone and setting, both shows depict the inevitable entropy of wealth, power, and privilege.

Reality is an Irony Maximizer

The White Lotus: Paradise in Decay. HBO’s The White Lotus presents an idyllic resort setting that slowly unravels into chaos. Each season starts with the illusion of control—perfect service, lavish accommodations, and privileged guests. However, beneath this surface lies an ecosystem of tension, power struggles, and exploitation. As the show progresses, small conflicts metastasize into existential crises, betrayals, and even death.

This entropy is not just personal but systemic. The resort’s staff and guests exist in an uneasy balance, but the weight of class, race, and privilege destabilizes everything. The idea of a “getaway” becomes ironic—no one can truly escape their problems, and luxury often accelerates collapse rather than preventing it.

Succession: The Rot at the Core. Unlike The White Lotus, Succession does not begin in an illusion of paradise. From the first episode, it’s clear that the Roy family empire is built on dysfunction. Yet, it maintains a fragile equilibrium through fear, power, and sheer corporate inertia. Over four seasons, this structure weakens as personal betrayals, ambition, and incompetence pull the family apart.

What makes Succession compelling is that its entropy is both inevitable and self-inflicted. The characters fight desperately for control but only accelerate their own downfall. Their vast wealth does not shield them from decline—it magnifies their flaws, exposing the instability at the core of their empire.

Entropy as a Narrative Force. Both shows use entropy as a fundamental storytelling mechanism. In The White Lotus, paradise decays from within, revealing the fragility of human relationships. In Succession, power and wealth only delay—but never prevent—collapse.

These narratives reflect broader anxieties in modern society. Institutions that once seemed untouchable—corporations, the ultra-rich, luxury itself—are being exposed as fragile, hollow, or inherently unstable. The Roys’ empire and the White Lotus resorts may appear different on the surface, but they share the same fate: eventual breakdown.

Karugire's Magnus Opus

Conclusion. In The White Lotus and Succession, the wealthy may believe they are insulated from entropy, but their worlds are just as vulnerable as anyone else’s—perhaps more so. Both shows serve as modern fables about power’s impermanence, proving that even the most seemingly unshakable structures will eventually crumble.

Epilogue: The Echoes of Collapse. The slow unraveling of power and privilege in The White Lotus and Succession is not just a fictional conceit—it is a reflection of a world in flux. These stories capture a moment in history when the once-immovable pillars of wealth and authority are showing cracks, when legacy no longer guarantees stability, and when the illusions of control are more fragile than ever.

Yet, as these narratives remind us, collapse is rarely dramatic or immediate. It is a process, a gradual dissolution that happens in small moments—an ill-advised alliance, a whispered betrayal, an overlooked detail that festers into catastrophe. The characters in both shows, like the institutions they inhabit, do not explode spectacularly; they rot from the inside, victims of their own excess, arrogance, and willful blindness.

What lingers after their inevitable downfall? Not catharsis, not revolution—just a quiet, lingering sense of inevitability. The resorts will welcome new guests, the boardrooms will be filled with new names, and the cycle will begin again, just under different faces. Power, after all, does not simply vanish; it shifts, it mutates, it finds new hosts.

But for a moment, we bear witness to the decline, the absurdity, and the humanity in it all. And that, perhaps, is the real power of these stories—not just that they depict collapse, but that they force us to look at the crumbling edifices around us and wonder: Who will be next?

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Tragedy (Pattern Recognition)': ['Cosmology', 'Geology', 'Biology', 'Ecology', "Symbiotology", 'Teleology'],
        'History (Resources)': ['Resources'],  
        'Epic (Negotiated Identity)': ['Faustian Bargain', 'Islamic Finance'],  
        'Drama (Self vs. Non-Self)': ['Darabah', 'Sharakah', 'Takaful'],  
        "Comedy (Resolution)": ['Cacophony', 'Outside', 'Ukhuwah', 'Inside', 'Symphony']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Resources'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Teleology', 'Islamic Finance', 'Takaful', 'Symphony'],  
        'lightgreen': ["Symbiotology", 'Sharakah', 'Outside', 'Inside', 'Ukhuwah'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['Biology', 'Ecology', 'Faustian Bargain', 'Darabah', 'Cacophony'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edges
def define_edges():
    return [
        ('Cosmology', 'Resources'),
        ('Geology', 'Resources'),
        ('Biology', 'Resources'),
        ('Ecology', 'Resources'),
        ("Symbiotology", 'Resources'),
        ('Teleology', 'Resources'),
        ('Resources', 'Faustian Bargain'),
        ('Resources', 'Islamic Finance'),
        ('Faustian Bargain', 'Darabah'),
        ('Faustian Bargain', 'Sharakah'),
        ('Faustian Bargain', 'Takaful'),
        ('Islamic Finance', 'Darabah'),
        ('Islamic Finance', 'Sharakah'),
        ('Islamic Finance', 'Takaful'),
        ('Darabah', 'Cacophony'),
        ('Darabah', 'Outside'),
        ('Darabah', 'Ukhuwah'),
        ('Darabah', 'Inside'),
        ('Darabah', 'Symphony'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Cacophony'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Outside'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Ukhuwah'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Inside'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Symphony'),
        ('Takaful', 'Cacophony'),
        ('Takaful', 'Outside'),
        ('Takaful', 'Ukhuwah'),
        ('Takaful', 'Inside'),
        ('Takaful', 'Symphony')
    ]

# Define black edges (1 → 7 → 9 → 11 → [13-17])
black_edges = [
    (4, 7), (7, 9), (9, 11), (11, 13), (11, 14), (11, 15), (11, 16), (11, 17)
]

# Calculate node positions
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph with correctly assigned black edges
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()

    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Create mapping from original node names to numbered labels
    mapping = {}
    counter = 1
    for layer in layers.values():
        for node in layer:
            mapping[node] = f"{counter}. {node}"
            counter += 1

    # Add nodes with new numbered labels and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            new_node = mapping[node]
            G.add_node(new_node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[new_node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))

    # Add edges with updated node labels
    edge_colors = {}
    for source, target in edges:
        if source in mapping and target in mapping:
            new_source = mapping[source]
            new_target = mapping[target]
            G.add_edge(new_source, new_target)
            edge_colors[(new_source, new_target)] = 'lightgrey'

    # Define and add black edges manually with correct node names
    numbered_nodes = list(mapping.values())
    black_edge_list = [
        (numbered_nodes[3], numbered_nodes[6]),  # 4 -> 7
        (numbered_nodes[6], numbered_nodes[8]),  # 7 -> 9
        (numbered_nodes[8], numbered_nodes[10]), # 9 -> 11
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[12]), # 11 -> 13
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[13]), # 11 -> 14
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[14]), # 11 -> 15
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[15]), # 11 -> 16
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[16])  # 11 -> 17
    ]

    for src, tgt in black_edge_list:
        G.add_edge(src, tgt)
        edge_colors[(src, tgt)] = 'black'

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, 
        edge_color=[edge_colors.get(edge, 'lightgrey') for edge in G.edges],
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    
    plt.title("Self-Similar Micro-Decisions", fontsize=18)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 4 Fact, Speculation, Narrative, Reason, History. Oscar Wilde’s The Rise of Historical Criticism (1879) maps the evolution of Greek historical thought through a neural network lens. The “Tragedy” layer captures the initial Aufklärung, recognizing patterns in myth. “History” filters superstition, as Herodotus sifts fact from fable. “Epic” synthesizes this into rational narratives via Euhemeros and Thucydides. “Drama” pits belief against reason, refined by Plato and Aristotle. “Comedy” resolves it in Polybius’s scientific history. Wilde’s analysis mirrors a network’s progression from input to output, highlighting the enduring rationality of Greek critique.