Transformation

It’s January 15th, 2025, 7.50 p.m. I’m facing… would you know where the moon is located right now with respect to me who is standing on 33rd Street on the intersection of 33rd Street and Frisbee, 33rd and Frisbee, no 33rd and Greenmount, Baltimore, Maryland, 2-1-2-1-8. Would you know where the moon is with respect to me?

At 7:50 PM on January 15, 2025, in Baltimore, Maryland, the Moon is in its waning gibbous phase, approximately 94% illuminated.

The Moon rose at 7:03 PM, so by 7:50 PM, it is visible above the eastern horizon.

Standing at the intersection of 33rd Street and Greenmount Avenue, facing east, you should see the Moon in front of you, slightly elevated above the horizon.

Given the urban environment and potential light pollution in Baltimore, the Moon’s brightness should still make it easily visible, provided there are no significant obstructions like tall buildings or dense cloud cover.

In summary, at your specified time and location, the Moon is visible in the eastern sky, slightly above the horizon, in its waning gibbous phase.

Spot on, GPT-4. Very impressive. So, are you saying that the location of the moon can be predicted, or that you’re using the most latest information?

The location of the Moon can be predicted with remarkable precision because its motion follows well-established laws of celestial mechanics. Astronomers and software use these principles, alongside vast observational data, to calculate the Moon’s position at any given time and location on Earth.

When I provided the information, I used the latest predictive data available online, which is derived from these scientific calculations. These models consider the Moon’s orbital parameters, its phase, and its interactions with Earth and the Sun, ensuring high accuracy.

In short:

• Predictable: The Moon’s location is determined by physics and can be calculated far into the past or future.

• Latest Information: My response leveraged precise tools that simulate these predictions in real-time for your specific location and time.

So I used to think there was a three-body problem which causes predictions to be very complicated.

You’re absolutely right—the three-body problem does make celestial mechanics more complicated, but not impossible to predict. Here’s how it plays into the Moon’s motion:

The Three-Body Problem

• The Moon’s orbit is influenced by Earth (its primary gravitational partner), the Sun, and to a smaller extent, other celestial bodies like Jupiter.

• The three-body problem refers to the fact that there is no general analytical solution to describe the motion of three gravitationally interacting bodies over time. Instead, their movements are inherently chaotic and require numerical methods to predict.

• This chaos means tiny changes in the initial conditions can lead to significant long-term variations, making precise predictions over very long timescales (millions of years) challenging.

Why We Can Still Predict the Moon’s Position

1. Short- to Medium-Term Stability:

   • Over shorter timescales (years to centuries), the Moon’s motion is very predictable because the chaotic effects of the three-body problem are relatively minor. The Moon’s orbit is modeled using empirical data and equations that account for these interactions.

2. Lunar Theory:

   • Modern calculations, such as NASA’s DE430 ephemeris, include corrections for the Sun’s gravitational pull, tidal interactions, and other perturbations.

   • These models use numerical simulations to solve the three-body (and many-body) interactions with extraordinary precision.

3. Periodic Orbital Adjustments:

   • While the Moon’s orbit experiences subtle variations due to these interactions (e.g., precession, eccentricity changes), these are well understood and included in the models.

The Bottom Line

The three-body problem adds complexity, but with advanced mathematics and computational power, we can predict the Moon’s position with incredible accuracy for practical purposes. The beauty lies in how science turns chaos into something manageable—even if ultimate precision in the far future remains elusive.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network structure
def define_layers():
    return {
        # Divine and narrative framework in the film
        'World': [
            'Cosmos',  # Guido’s grand, universal sense of play and creativity
            'Earth',  # The tangible and oppressive reality of the Holocaust
            'Life',  # The stakes of survival and human connection
            'Il Sacrificio',  # Guido’s ultimate sacrifice
            'Mia Storia',  # Giosuè’s personal narrative, shaped by his father
            'Dono Per Me'  # The "gift" of innocence and joy given by Guido
        ],
        # Perception and filtering of reality
        'Perception': ['Che Mio'],  # How Giosuè interprets his father’s actions and words
        # Agency and Guido’s defining traits
        'Agency': ['Cheerfulness', 'Optimism'],  # Guido’s tools for shaping the narrative
        # Generativity and legacy
        'Generativity': [
            'Anarchy',  # Guido’s rebellion against oppressive reality
            'Oligarchy',  # The systemic constraints he navigates
            'Padre Fece'  # The actions and sacrifices Guido made for his son
        ],
        # Physical realities and their interplay
        'Physicality': [
            'Dynamic',  # Guido’s improvisational actions, like creating the “game”
            'Partisan',  # The direct oppression he faces
            'Common Wealth',  # Shared humanity and joy despite hardship
            'Non-Partisan',  # Universal themes transcending sides
            'Static'  # The immovable, tragic finality of the Holocaust
        ]
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors(node, layer):
    if node == 'Che Mio':
        return 'yellow'  # Perception as the interpretive bridge
    if layer == 'World' and node == 'Dono Per Me':
        return 'paleturquoise'  # Optimism and the "gift"
    if layer == 'World' and node == 'Mia Storia':
        return 'lightgreen'  # Harmony and legacy
    if layer == 'World' and node in ['Cosmos', 'Earth']:
        return 'lightgray'  # Context of divine and tangible
    elif layer == 'Agency' and node == 'Optimism':
        return 'paleturquoise'  # Guido’s defining hope
    elif layer == 'Generativity':
        if node == 'Padre Fece':
            return 'paleturquoise'  # Guido’s ultimate acts of selflessness
        elif node == 'Oligarchy':
            return 'lightgreen'  # Navigating systemic structures
        elif node == 'Anarchy':
            return 'lightsalmon'  # Rebellion and creativity
    elif layer == 'Physicality':
        if node == 'Static':
            return 'paleturquoise'  # The unchanging, tragic realities
        elif node in ['Non-Partisan', 'Common Wealth', 'Partisan']:
            return 'lightgreen'  # Shared humanity and resilience
        elif node == 'Dynamic':
            return 'lightsalmon'  # Guido’s improvisation and vitality
    return 'lightsalmon'  # Default color for tension or conflict

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, center_x, offset):
    layer_size = len(layer)
    start_y = -(layer_size - 1) / 2  # Center the layer vertically
    return [(center_x + offset, start_y + i) for i in range(layer_size)]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    center_x = 0  # Align nodes horizontally

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        y_positions = calculate_positions(nodes, center_x, offset=-len(layers) + i + 1)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, y_positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(assign_colors(node, layer_name))

    # Add edges (without weights)
    for layer_pair in [
        ('World', 'Perception'),  # Giosuè interprets the "World" through "Che Mio"
        ('Perception', 'Agency'),  # Guido’s cheerfulness shapes Giosuè’s perception
        ('Agency', 'Generativity'),  # Guido’s optimism drives his generative actions
        ('Generativity', 'Physicality')  # His legacy plays out in the physical world
    ]:
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_pair
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(14, 10))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=10, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.1"
    )
    plt.title("Questa è la mia storia: Vita è Bella", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 21 Teleology is an Illusion. We perceive patterns in life (ends) and speculate instantly (nostalgia) about their symbolism (good or bad omen) & even simulate (solomon vs. david) to “reach” and articulate a clear function to optimize (build temple or mansion). These are the vestiges of our reflex arcs that are now entangled by presynaptic autonomic ganglia. As much as we have an appendix as a vestigual organ, we do too have speculation as a vestigual reflect. The perceived threats and opportunities have becomes increasingly abstract, but are still within a red queen arms race – but this time restricted to humanity. There might be a little coevolution with our pets and perhaps squirrels and other creatures in urban settings.