Duality#
At the core of the relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk lies an unspoken, deeply ideological commitment to the preservation and reinforcement of a racial hierarchy that has historically defined Western power structures. While their public personas may differ—Trump as the populist demagogue, Musk as the techno-libertarian futurist—their underlying instincts converge on a fundamental belief: civilization, in its modern, pluralistic form, has become too weak, too encumbered by its commitments to equality and justice. In their worldview, strength must be restored, and that strength is biological as much as it is political. This is the Red Queen ideology, where survival is reserved for those willing to run the race, to outcompete, to dominate. Civilization, with its ideals of fairness, redistribution, and inclusion, is a roadblock to this natural order, something to be dismantled piece by piece.
The fixation on biological lineage in both men is revealing. Musk’s systematic reproduction with Canadian women, while genetically arbitrary, is unmistakably deliberate. It suggests an attempt at controlled legacy, a personal eugenics project disguised as libertarian individualism. His South African origins, steeped in the racial hierarchies of apartheid, offer a framework through which this makes sense—not in the overt, pseudo-scientific eugenics of the Nazis, but in the more insidious idea that some lineages are worth perpetuating in greater numbers than others. The fact that his offspring are not just white but specifically Canadian—descendants of a colonial system that, while tamer than South Africa’s, was built on parallel principles of land seizure and indigenous suppression—is striking. It suggests a desire to reinforce a particular kind of white Anglo-European identity, one distanced from the messy realities of American racial politics but still rooted in an exclusionary worldview.

Fig. 13 Games People Play. The five realms in which the games exist are resource (inherited, orphan), need (transform, stagnate, squander), cost (brand, oblivion), means (weaponize, tokenize, monopolize – in a word, personalize target), ends (cadence). See also M’élève, γ 😃 ⭕️. Most neural network models are designed to minimize the ecological cost function, which is synonymous with maximizing the efficiency and means by which our agent-protagonist navigates the labyrinth of life – none of the madness of Odysseus. From this perspective, the cadence is merely a final leap along an efficiency frontier. Morality, represented by the Plagal – or even Authentic – cadence operates on similar terms. Demands a narrative rather than unbounded exploration of the massive combinatorial space of life. In Milos’s Amadeus, the film follows a very specific tragectory, capturing the evolution and context of Mozart’s work. And its cadence is Mozart’s death, whose cadence is Lacrimosa, which has a Plagal cadence … Ecosystem-Integration: 1. Delete 60% 2. Simulate 10% of it 3. Optimize the new thing. Please don’t optimize a thing that shouldn’t exist. Ditto
, iterate, faster, automating …#
Trump, too, follows an eerily consistent reproductive pattern. His selection of European wives—Ivana from Czechoslovakia, Melania from Slovenia—suggests an instinctual preference for a certain kind of woman: white, foreign, and from nations that once existed under authoritarian regimes. There is no randomness to this, no purely personal choice unshaped by larger ideological undercurrents. It speaks to a desire for controlled lineage, for the careful curation of heirs from a genetic pool that aligns with his vision of power. His own German ancestry—barely removed from the 20th-century upheavals that defined race and identity politics in the Western world—plays into this, whether consciously or not. His actions, his rhetoric, and his alliances all suggest a deep unease with the idea that civilization has strayed too far from the power dynamics that once made Western dominance absolute.
It is no coincidence, then, that South Africa has emerged as a key battleground in this vision. The nation, still struggling with the legacy of apartheid, represents precisely the kind of post-colonial reckoning that Musk and Trump wish to prevent elsewhere. The ongoing debates over land redistribution—wherein a government led by Black South Africans is seeking to reclaim land still disproportionately held by the white minority—directly contradict the Red Queen model that both men seem to embrace. In their eyes, such efforts are not just unfair but an existential threat to the logic of power they wish to preserve. Civilization, when it corrects past injustices, ceases to be efficient. It disrupts the natural order of winners and losers, the very thing that Musk’s upbringing in apartheid-era South Africa and Trump’s racial instincts warn against.
The probable cutting of USAID funds to South Africa, the aggressive rhetoric against its government, and the quiet erasure of its economic ties to the United States all point to a larger project—one that extends beyond mere policy disputes. This is ideological warfare, a global attempt to turn back the clock, to reassert the primacy of those who have historically held power. In this vision, civilization is tolerated only insofar as it does not interfere with the Red Queen’s race. The moment it seeks to alter the pace, to redistribute, to protect, it becomes the enemy.
Musk and Trump’s partnership, then, is not just about governance or even about personal ambition. It is about a fundamental struggle between two visions of the future—one in which civilization continues its project of undoing the structures of hierarchy and exclusion, and one in which those structures are restored, reinforced, and made unassailable. The biological instincts evident in their choices of partners, their treatment of reproduction, and their geopolitical maneuvers are all part of this same impulse. It is not about genes in a scientific sense but about legacy, about engineering a future in which power remains concentrated in the hands of those who have always held it.
This is the shadow that looms over the emerging world order. If civilization is to resist the pull of the Red Queen, it must recognize this movement for what it is: not just a political shift but an existential challenge to the very idea of a world in which survival is no longer determined by the raw mechanics of dominance and exclusion. What Musk and Trump seek is not just a rollback of progressive policies but a reversion to something far older, far more primal—a world where civilization does not protect the weak but ensures that only the strong remain.
Show code cell source
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx
# Define the neural network
def define_layers():
return {
'World': ['Cosmos-Entropy', 'World-Tempered', 'Ucubona-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Space-Trial & Error', 'Time-Cadence', ],
'Mode': ['Ucubona-Limbic'],
'Agent': ['Oblivion-Cortex', 'Algorithm-Trusted'],
'Space': ['Ratio-Weaponized', 'Guardrail-Tokenized', 'Odds-Monopolized'],
'Time': ['Volatile-Machine', 'Unveiled-Resentment', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Stable-Victorian']
}
# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
color_map = {
'yellow': ['Ucubona-Limbic'],
'paleturquoise': ['Time-Cadence', 'Algorithm-Trusted', 'Odds-Monopolized', 'Stable-Victorian'],
'lightgreen': ['Space-Trial & Error', 'Guardrail-Tokenized', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Unveiled-Resentment'],
'lightsalmon': [
'Ucubona-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Oblivion-Cortex',
'Ratio-Weaponized', 'Volatile-Machine'
],
}
return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}
# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]
# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
layers = define_layers()
colors = assign_colors()
G = nx.DiGraph()
pos = {}
node_colors = []
# Add nodes and assign positions
for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
pos[node] = position
node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))
# Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
layer_names = list(layers.keys())
for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
for source in layers[source_layer]:
for target in layers[target_layer]:
G.add_edge(source, target)
# Draw the graph
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
nx.draw(
G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
)
plt.title("Neuralink: Mitigation Agaist AI-Existential Risk", fontsize=15)
plt.show()
# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()


Fig. 14 Tryptophan, Tryptamine, and Y’all Who Be Trippin’. Information in nature is encoded in gravity and photons and zapped from the cosmos, to earth, to life, to silicon. As for the point of view, thats open for discourse. Source: Lorenzo Expeditions. And if we invert all the aforementioned, then we might say something like: The code provides a unique blend of art and science, creating a visual narrative that might engage viewers in thinking about the structure of thought, decision-making, or the whimsical nature of reality as depicted in “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” - Grok-2.#