Freedom in Fetters

The Missing Fifth Step: Why Sean Combs Never Became a Religion

Sean “Diddy” Combs is a case study in resourcefulness, branding, and tribal formation, yet he remains just short of the final transformation—the leap into myth, the step into the divine, the crossing over into religion. Donald Trump, by contrast, completed the journey. He is, at least to his followers, a messianic figure, a persecuted redeemer who has been baptized in the fire of scandal and yet emerged unscathed. Trump has transcended mere celebrity or moguldom; he is an article of faith, his name spoken in reverence. Combs, for all his power and vision, remains a mortal—a powerful one, yes, a cultural force, but not a religion. The question is: why?

Both men started in the same place. They were heirs, born into wealth, though of vastly different kinds. Combs’ father, Melvin, was a Harlem drug dealer murdered when Combs was a child. Trump’s father, Fred, was a real estate baron who built middle-class housing in Queens. Both sons took their inheritance—whether financial or reputational—and multiplied it exponentially. Combs went from intern to mogul, from Bad Boy Records to Sean John, from music to fashion to liquor. Trump, similarly, transformed his father’s outer-borough empire into a global brand, plastering his name on buildings from Manhattan to Istanbul. Neither man innovated in the traditional sense; their genius lay in expansion, in branding, in creating the illusion of scale that became reality. But even in this, Combs fell short of Trump’s all-encompassing omnipresence. Combs’ empire was massive but compartmentalized—music here, fashion there, a liquor deal on the side. Trump’s empire was singular, unified under the golden letters of his surname. Trump, in essence, collapsed his odds into a singularity; Combs kept his fragmented.

Fig. 26 The Next Time Your Horse is Behaving Well, Sell it. The numbers in private equity don’t add up because its very much like a betting in a horse race. Too many entrants and exits for anyone to have a reliable dataset with which to estimate odds for any horse-jokey vs. the others for quinella, trifecta, superfecta

Branding was where both men thrived. Combs made “Bad Boy” a lifestyle, a state of mind. He fused R&B and hip-hop, crafting a commercial empire that was inseparable from the sound of the late ’90s. Sean John brought urban luxury into the mainstream, blending streetwear with high fashion. Trump’s brand, meanwhile, was simple, brute-force marketing: Trump meant wealth, dominance, success. His name was his product. Trump buildings, Trump steaks, Trump University—it didn’t matter what it was, so long as it had the name. His entire existence was branding, where Combs’ was an empire of separate brands. Trump operated as a singularity; Combs, again, as a fragmented network.

Then comes the fourth step: the tribe. Here, Combs succeeded brilliantly in his own way. Bad Boy Records wasn’t just a label—it was a movement. The artists under his umbrella, from The Notorious B.I.G. to Ma$e to 112 to Mary J. Blige, all contributed to the mythology. But this was where the cracks began to show. The Bad Boy tribe was not built on loyalty; it was built on power. Artists left. Some turned on him. There are no glowing testimonials from his closest collaborators. There is no Bad Boy congregation, no sustained generational following. Combs extracted value from his tribe, but he did not build an altar for them to worship at.

Trump, by contrast, built a true congregation. MAGA is not just a movement; it is a belief system. His followers do not see themselves as political supporters but as members of a faith. They wear the hat, they chant the slogans, they gather in pilgrimage at his rallies. They believe. Trump positioned himself as the only one who could bring salvation, the sole force capable of restoring lost greatness. He turned his name into a prophecy. Combs never did. He sold products; Trump sold destiny.

And here we arrive at the final, missing step: religion. To become a religion, one must collapse the odds entirely. There must be no alternative, no viable second option. Trump has done this. To his followers, he is the only one. There is no second choice. There is Trump or chaos, Trump or oblivion. His survival—through impeachment, through scandal, through legal battles—is his martyrdom. He is a living resurrection.

Combs never achieved this because his relationships were always transactional. No one followed him to the bitter end. Bad Boy was a launchpad, not a temple. He expanded his empire, but he never made himself indispensable. He was an emperor, not a prophet. His genius was in movement, in seizing opportunities. But that is precisely why he could never ascend. Trump, for all his failures, built permanence. His empire became belief.

So why did Combs stop at the fourth step? Perhaps it was by choice. To build a religion is to sacrifice something essential: autonomy, fluidity, the ability to move freely. Trump surrendered himself to the cause of Trump. He cannot walk away from his own mythology. He is trapped in his own narrative. Combs, by contrast, remains a businessman. He can pivot, disappear, reinvent. He is not bound by doctrine. Perhaps, in the end, that was the price he was unwilling to pay.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network fractal
def define_layers():
    return {
        'World': ['Cosmos-Entropy', 'Planet-Tempered', 'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Generative-Means', 'Cartel-Ends', ], # Polytheism, Olympus, Kingdom
        'Perception': ['Perception-Ledger'], # God, Judgement Day, Key
        'Agency': ['Open-Nomiddleman', 'Closed-Trusted'], # Evil & Good
        'Generative': ['Ratio-Weaponized', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Odds-Monopolized'], # Dynamics, Compromises
        'Physical': ['Volatile-Revolutionary', 'Unveiled-Resentment',  'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Stable-Conservative'] # Values
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Perception-Ledger'],
        'paleturquoise': ['Cartel-Ends', 'Closed-Trusted', 'Odds-Monopolized', 'Stable-Conservative'],
        'lightgreen': ['Generative-Means', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Unveiled-Resentment'],
        'lightsalmon': [
            'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Open-Nomiddleman', # Ecosystem = Red Queen = Prometheus = Sacrifice
            'Ratio-Weaponized', 'Volatile-Revolutionary'
        ],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))  # Default color fallback

    # Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
    layer_names = list(layers.keys())
    for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    plt.title("Inversion as Transformation", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 27 From a Pianist View. Left hand voices the mode and defines harmony. Right hand voice leads freely extend and alter modal landscapes. In R&B that typically manifests as 9ths, 11ths, 13ths. Passing chords and leading notes are often chromatic in the genre. Music is evocative because it transmits information that traverses through a primeval pattern-recognizing architecture that demands a classification of what you confront as the sort for feeding & breeding or fight & flight. It’s thus a very high-risk, high-error business if successful. We may engage in pattern recognition in literature too: concluding by inspection but erroneously that his silent companion was engaged in mental composition he reflected on the pleasures derived from literature of instruction rather than of amusement as he himself had applied to the works of William Shakespeare more than once for the solution of difficult problems in imaginary or real life. Source: Ulysses