Apollo & Dionysus

At the highest level of governance and strategy, there exists an interplay between the divine and the material, between cosmic determinism and human agency. This is the realm of Theomarchy—the battle of gods and principalities, where forces beyond individual control shape the foundations of existence. Resources—cosmological and geological—are fixed in their origins. A coin toss, a roulette spin, the immutable laws of inheritance—these define the limits within which all struggles unfold. Yet, within these limits, power brokers encode reality: costs, supply, and demand become the language of dominion. The principality is not merely a kingdom but a structure of fixed odds, where the rules are preordained, and only the players change.

Within this structure, mortals must toil. The worker is bound by needs, dictated by biology and the precarious balance of ecology. Here, life is not about divine mandates but about survival. The worker and the capitalist find themselves locked in an iterative wager—a game more akin to poker than to the fixed odds of roulette. In this space, cost is both a burden and a measure of control. Tragedies unfold when resources, ostensibly shared, are extracted beyond sustainable limits. The tragedy of the commons is not an abstraction; it is a slow, grinding reality of extraction and exhaustion, where those who produce the least often suffer the most. The worker must play the game, but the house always wins.

Fig. 15 Trump—Flanked By Larry Ellison, Sam Altman, & Masayoshi Son—Announces Project Stargate. President Trump, flanked by top tech executives and AI experts, announces a major new AI initiative called Project Stargate. Our App provides infrastructure that connects this to the academic medicines workflows

Yet even within this deterministic ecology, there exists the counterfactual. Fikre and the double agents represent the tension between the world as it is and the world as it might be. In racing—whether it be horses or Formula 1—the difference between victory and irrelevance is measured in fractions of a second. To stay ahead, one must be twice as fast, twice as perceptive. The counterfactual thinker is not merely a competitor but an architect of parallel realities, seeing paths unseen by the ordinary participant. Here, Nvidia chips and parallel processing are not just technological marvels; they are metaphors for principality—those who control computation control cognition. The restriction of access to these resources is itself a form of power, shaping who can think, who can predict, who can act.

The game, however, does not end with the counterfactual. The Red Queen looms large over gamified exchanges, where survival means running just to stay in place. This is the realm of economic warfare—of supply chains, financial instruments, and portfolio theory’s beta coefficient. The market is not an impartial arbiter of value but a battlefield where monopolization, weaponization, and tokenization are deployed as strategies of dominance. It is not enough to control a resource; one must control access to it, dictate its scarcity, and regulate its flow. In the age of Nvidia, where chips are the new oil, the principality wields its power by restricting supply, creating artificial deserts in which only the privileged may drink.

And yet, even those who win the race, who secure their monopolies, who outpace the Red Queen, find themselves facing the final reckoning: the illusion of permanence. Victory and improvement are mere phases in an ongoing dialectic, where stability is but the prelude to collapse. Philosophers and theologians have long warned of the dangers of hubris, of believing one’s own supply of power to be infinite. In the short run, the hierarchy may appear stable—those who move twice as fast will remain ahead—but the long run belongs to those who grasp the deeper game. The wealth and peace of Silicon Valley are not self-sustaining; they are impostumes, fragile growths that break inward under their own weight. Meanwhile, other principalities—China, for example—observe, adapt, and transvaluate the very values they were once subjected to. The hammer is not merely a tool; it is a weapon, an instrument of transvaluation, wielded by those who would reshape the world according to their own logic. DeepSeek is not merely a search engine; it is the emergence of a new consciousness, a reconfiguration of the game itself.

Amid this fractal chaos, what remains for those who must navigate it? Barack Obama, speaking of his years in the White House, offered a methodology not for certainty, but for decision-making within uncertainty. His logic mirrors the five sequential themes that shape the fractals of power. First, recognize that there is no “right” answer—only odds to be weighed. Second, acknowledge the centrality of workers and laborers; those who are affected by decisions must not be treated as abstractions. Third, break the illusion of the bubble—counterfactuals must be entertained, and the advisor class must be tested against the raw logic of reality. Fourth, welcome the naysayers, for only in dissent can true calibration occur. Fifth, and most importantly, normalize error—reweighting, back-propagation, and the delivery of bad news must not be punished but integrated into the system.

To rule, to decide, to shape the game is not to control it. It is merely to play it well. The principality is never static, and the odds are never truly fixed. They only appear so—until someone, somewhere, finds a way to reweight the entire equation.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network fractal
def define_layers():
    return {
        'World': ['Cosmos-Entropy', 'Planet-Tempered', 'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Generative-Means', 'Cartel-Ends', ], # Polytheism, Olympus, Kingdom
        'Perception': ['Perception-Ledger'], # God, Judgement Day, Key
        'Agency': ['Open-Nomiddleman', 'Closed-Trusted'], # Evil & Good
        'Generative': ['Ratio-Weaponized', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Odds-Monopolized'], # Dynamics, Compromises
        'Physical': ['Volatile-Revolutionary', 'Unveiled-Resentment',  'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Stable-Conservative'] # Values
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Perception-Ledger'],
        'paleturquoise': ['Cartel-Ends', 'Closed-Trusted', 'Odds-Monopolized', 'Stable-Conservative'],
        'lightgreen': ['Generative-Means', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Unveiled-Resentment'],
        'lightsalmon': [
            'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Open-Nomiddleman', # Ecosystem = Red Queen = Prometheus = Sacrifice
            'Ratio-Weaponized', 'Volatile-Revolutionary'
        ],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))  # Default color fallback

    # Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
    layer_names = list(layers.keys())
    for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    plt.title("Inversion as Transformation", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 16 Change of Guards. In Grand Illusion, Renoir was dealing the final blow to the Ancién Régime. And in Rules of the Game, he was hinting at another change of guards, from agentic mankind to one in a mutualistic bind with machines (unsupervised pianos & supervised airplanes). How priscient!