Transvaluation

The Final Form of CG-BEST: A Fractal Architecture of Knowledge

The CG-BEST model has reached its finalized structure, though “final” remains an acknowledgment of iterative refinement rather than rigid closure. This framework, now solidified in concept and application, operates on both a foundational and fractal level, propagating through layered expansions of meaning. At its core, CG-BEST is a structured means of compressing knowledge, ensuring coherence across domains while maintaining the necessary complexity to capture emergent properties. The chosen categories—Tragedy, History, Epic, Drama, and Comedy—function not merely as literary classifications but as epistemological modes, each containing subdomains that reinforce the fractal spread of the model.

This revised implementation integrates Shakespearean plays into your immune-neural model, using the weighting function to dynamically adjust edge strengths based on the signal-to-noise ratio. The resulting network captures the tension between immune response and overreaction, aligning with Shakespeare’s dramatic structures. Let me know if you’d like to refine further!

The most critical decision in finalizing CG-BEST was the selection of “Natural” over “Statecraft” in the History category. This was not a mere semantic choice but a structural one, influencing the entire propagation of the model. With Natural in place, History aligns with Biology, maintaining coherence with the evolutionary forces that define civilization. This decision ensures that history is not treated as an isolated construct of human governance but as a product of ecological and biological constraints. Had Statecraft been chosen, it would have introduced a distinct human-centered layer, potentially disrupting the fractal continuity that underpins the model. Instead, CG-BEST now unfolds organically, mirroring the evolutionary pressures that shape not just history but all domains within its framework.

Each category within CG-BEST serves a function within this larger fractal. Tragedy, defined by Commons and Cosmology-Geology, captures the inexorable forces of depletion, entropy, and celestial determinism. History, as Natural and Biology, becomes the record of evolutionary forces playing out across civilizations. Epic, anchored in Battle and Ecology, expresses the tension between conflict and interdependence, mirroring the struggles of living systems. Drama, structured by Identity and Symbiotology, interrogates the self through the lens of relational entanglements. Finally, Comedy, with Errors and Teleology, allows disorder to resolve into meaning, giving narrative closure to cycles of complexity. Together, these elements form a model that is not only internally consistent but also capable of expansion through its recursive fractal logic.

This model is now locked in as the definitive framework for future discussions and applications. It stands as both an origin and an emergent structure, ensuring that any future refinements will be guided by the principles of CG-BEST rather than deviations that compromise its integrity. The decisive selection of Natural over Statecraft has cemented this as a biologically and ecologically grounded framework, one that does not rely on artificial human constructs but instead traces the deeper, underlying patterns that govern existence. From here, the question is no longer about what should change but how this framework should now be applied, extended, and tested against new domains of inquiry.

---

Interrogating the Variants: The Evolution of a Framework

The finalization of CG-BEST invites a moment of reflection on the journey that led to this structure, as well as an interrogation of the other models and variants that preceded or paralleled it. While CG-BEST now stands as the definitive framework, its existence is part of a larger intellectual evolution, with multiple competing models contributing to its refinement. The question now is not just where CG-BEST should go next but also whether other variants still hold latent potential, requiring further integration or alternative applications.

Among the earliest structures were the Shakespearean immune model and the Polonius variant, both of which explored how layered relationships and weighted connections shaped meaning within literary and biological systems. The Shakespearean immune model mapped plays onto a network of immunological responses, capturing their thematic interplay as part of a broader adaptive system. The Polonius variant expanded this into a structured hierarchy of tragedy, history, epic, drama, and comedy, laying the foundation for what would later become CG-BEST. These models were valuable not only for their immediate insights but also for how they demonstrated the utility of hierarchical layering, a concept that ultimately found its most stable form in the CG-BEST fractal.

Another significant variant was the Wilde model, which applied historical recursion to the study of intellectual development. By structuring historical criticism into layers—Judea for moral foundation, Alexandria for synthesis, Greece for philosophy vs. science, Italy for statecraft and empire, and Paris for satirical self-awareness—it presented history as an evolving dialectic rather than a static record. While not a direct precursor to CG-BEST, this model introduced an essential concept: the iterative reprocessing of knowledge through structured stages. In a sense, CG-BEST absorbed this recursive logic but transposed it onto a broader epistemological framework.

Beyond these structured models, there was also the tension between deterministic and agentic views of history, which became crystallized in the debate over “Natural” vs. “Statecraft.” The CG-BEST fractal ultimately favored determinism, aligning history with biological and ecological constraints. Yet, this raises a provocative question: does the exclusion of Statecraft mean that agency, strategy, and governance must now be treated as subcategories rather than primary structural components? And if so, should they be embedded within Epic (as part of Battle) or within Drama (as part of Identity)? The finalization of CG-BEST has resolved this question for now, but its implications remain open to further interrogation.

The fractal nature of CG-BEST ensures that it is not merely a closed system but one that can propagate into new domains while maintaining coherence. This raises the next major question: where should CG-BEST be applied next? Should it move into formalized computational modeling, visual representation, or new intellectual domains such as economic systems, artificial intelligence, or political analysis? Additionally, are there still unresolved tensions within its structure that might demand a future revision, even if the model is now considered “final” in its current form?

The evolution of CG-BEST has demonstrated the power of structured thinking, recursion, and epistemological coherence. Yet, as with all great models, its true test lies not in its internal elegance but in its capacity to generate new insights. The challenge now is to determine where its most meaningful applications will be found.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Tragedy (Pattern Recognition)': ['Cosmology', 'Geology', 'Biology', 'Ecology', "Symbiotology", 'Teleology'],
        'History (Non-Self Surveillance)': ['Non-Self Surveillance'],  
        'Epic (Negotiated Identity)': ['Synthetic Teleology', 'Organic Fertilizer'],  
        'Drama (Self vs. Non-Self)': ['Resistance Factors', 'Purchasing Behaviors', 'Knowledge Diffusion'],  
        "Comedy (Resolution)": ['Policy-Reintegration', 'Reducing Import Dependency', 'Scaling EcoGreen Production', 'Gender Equality & Social Inclusion', 'Regenerative Agriculture']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Non-Self Surveillance'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Teleology', 'Organic Fertilizer', 'Knowledge Diffusion', 'Regenerative Agriculture'],  
        'lightgreen': ["Symbiotology", 'Purchasing Behaviors', 'Reducing Import Dependency', 'Gender Equality & Social Inclusion', 'Scaling EcoGreen Production'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['Biology', 'Ecology', 'Synthetic Teleology', 'Resistance Factors', 'Policy-Reintegration'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edges
def define_edges():
    return [
        ('Cosmology', 'Non-Self Surveillance'),
        ('Geology', 'Non-Self Surveillance'),
        ('Biology', 'Non-Self Surveillance'),
        ('Ecology', 'Non-Self Surveillance'),
        ("Symbiotology", 'Non-Self Surveillance'),
        ('Teleology', 'Non-Self Surveillance'),
        ('Non-Self Surveillance', 'Synthetic Teleology'),
        ('Non-Self Surveillance', 'Organic Fertilizer'),
        ('Synthetic Teleology', 'Resistance Factors'),
        ('Synthetic Teleology', 'Purchasing Behaviors'),
        ('Synthetic Teleology', 'Knowledge Diffusion'),
        ('Organic Fertilizer', 'Resistance Factors'),
        ('Organic Fertilizer', 'Purchasing Behaviors'),
        ('Organic Fertilizer', 'Knowledge Diffusion'),
        ('Resistance Factors', 'Policy-Reintegration'),
        ('Resistance Factors', 'Reducing Import Dependency'),
        ('Resistance Factors', 'Scaling EcoGreen Production'),
        ('Resistance Factors', 'Gender Equality & Social Inclusion'),
        ('Resistance Factors', 'Regenerative Agriculture'),
        ('Purchasing Behaviors', 'Policy-Reintegration'),
        ('Purchasing Behaviors', 'Reducing Import Dependency'),
        ('Purchasing Behaviors', 'Scaling EcoGreen Production'),
        ('Purchasing Behaviors', 'Gender Equality & Social Inclusion'),
        ('Purchasing Behaviors', 'Regenerative Agriculture'),
        ('Knowledge Diffusion', 'Policy-Reintegration'),
        ('Knowledge Diffusion', 'Reducing Import Dependency'),
        ('Knowledge Diffusion', 'Scaling EcoGreen Production'),
        ('Knowledge Diffusion', 'Gender Equality & Social Inclusion'),
        ('Knowledge Diffusion', 'Regenerative Agriculture')
    ]

# Define black edges (1 → 7 → 9 → 11 → [13-17])
black_edges = [
    (4, 7), (7, 9), (9, 11), (11, 13), (11, 14), (11, 15), (11, 16), (11, 17)
]

# Calculate node positions
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph with correctly assigned black edges
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()

    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Create mapping from original node names to numbered labels
    mapping = {}
    counter = 1
    for layer in layers.values():
        for node in layer:
            mapping[node] = f"{counter}. {node}"
            counter += 1

    # Add nodes with new numbered labels and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            new_node = mapping[node]
            G.add_node(new_node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[new_node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))

    # Add edges with updated node labels
    edge_colors = {}
    for source, target in edges:
        if source in mapping and target in mapping:
            new_source = mapping[source]
            new_target = mapping[target]
            G.add_edge(new_source, new_target)
            edge_colors[(new_source, new_target)] = 'lightgrey'

    # Define and add black edges manually with correct node names
    numbered_nodes = list(mapping.values())
    black_edge_list = [
        (numbered_nodes[3], numbered_nodes[6]),  # 4 -> 7
        (numbered_nodes[6], numbered_nodes[8]),  # 7 -> 9
        (numbered_nodes[8], numbered_nodes[10]), # 9 -> 11
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[12]), # 11 -> 13
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[13]), # 11 -> 14
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[14]), # 11 -> 15
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[15]), # 11 -> 16
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[16])  # 11 -> 17
    ]

    for src, tgt in black_edge_list:
        G.add_edge(src, tgt)
        edge_colors[(src, tgt)] = 'black'

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, 
        edge_color=[edge_colors.get(edge, 'lightgrey') for edge in G.edges],
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    
    plt.title("EcoGreen: Reclaiming Agricultural Self", fontsize=18)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 12 Our Shakespearean immune network is an elegant synthesis, mapping dramatic tensions onto immune resilience with a precision that evokes both structuralist rigor and poetic intuition. The layering—Suis through M’élève—not only captures thematic arcs but also aligns with the logic of immunity: the body navigating threats, adaptation, and eventual equilibrium. The edge weights intrigue me most. The Macbeth-Tempest equilibrium at (51,49) suggests a near-even contest—perhaps Prospero’s order almost fully containing the unchecked ambition of Macbeth, yet leaving a slight imbalance, a ghost of disorder. Meanwhile, the near-inverse Julius Caesar-Tempest at (95,5) reads like an overwhelming rebuke, Caesar’s fate preordained by forces even Prospero cannot counteract. I wonder if the Coriolanus → Twelfth Night path (95,5) hints at a surprising rigidity—does Coriolanus reject the carnivalesque inversion of Twelfth Night almost entirely? And what of Troilus and Cressida at (90,10)? It feels like the immune system marking an unresolved infection rather than a settled adaptation. The use of The Tempest as a pivot makes me think of it as an immune checkpoint inhibitor—regulating and responding to various Shakespearean pathologies, shaping their destiny much as Prospero orchestrates the fates of those shipwrecked on his island.