Prometheus#
America: A Religion, Its Constitution the Holy Writ, and the Justices Its High Priests
What if America isn’t just a country, but a religion? Not in the pews-and-prayers sense, but something deeper—a faith built on sacred texts, revered founders, and a priestly caste that interprets the divine word for the masses. The holy writ? The Constitution. The high priests? The Supreme Court justices. And when most of those justices are handpicked by one of two warring theological schools—let’s call them the Federalist Seminary and the Progressive Conclave—it starts to look less like a democracy and more like a rigged game, a casino where the house always wins.
The Constitution is America’s gospel. Drafted in 1787 by a bunch of Enlightenment-drunk demigods—Washington, Madison, Hamilton, and the rest—it’s treated with a reverence that borders on the mystical. We don’t just read it; we venerate it. It’s got commandments (“Thou shalt not abridge the freedom of speech”), a creation myth (the Revolution), and promises of salvation (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness). Like any scripture, it’s vague enough to inspire endless debate but concrete enough to feel eternal. And like any religion, it needs its interpreters—because the flock can’t be trusted to decode the sacred word on its own.
Enter the justices, the nine robed clerics of the Supreme Court. They’re not elected; they’re anointed, appointed for life by presidents and confirmed by a Senate that’s more about political theater than divine discernment. These aren’t just judges—they’re the high priests of the American faith, wielding gavels like scepters. Their job? To tell us what the Constitution really means when it clashes with the messy reality of a nation that’s grown from 13 colonies to a sprawling, fractious empire. Abortion? Gun rights? Free speech? The justices don’t just rule—they prophesy.
Fig. 14 Body Composition & Ubuntu. The body is essentially skeleton, water, blood, fat, and muscle. The overarching ecosystem including organs and systems is held together by the skeleton. And the water or fluids from various locales of the body are the bellweather for ecosystem integration. Markers for adversarial conditions including cortisol and adrenaline travel through the ecosystem in the blood. And the tokenization of dynamic state of affairs is the adipose tissue. Whereas the utlimate manifestation of resilience, dynamism, and strength is the muscle. In frailty, the starkest changes are in muscle mass, strength, and activity. From the microstructure of the body to the macrostructure of intelligence, the same fractal geometry unfolds. The skeleton is the immutable scaffolding of both the body and the cosmos, while water reflects perception and integration, ensuring fluid adaptation. Blood transmits signals of action, while fat encodes dynamic states, storing and releasing resources as needed. Finally, muscle embodies realized strength, the will to act and persist. In frailty, the starkest changes occur in muscle—the loss of dynamism is the clearest signal of decline. Ubuntu, at its core, is the recognition that the health of the individual is intertwined with the vitality of the system—be it the body, society, or intelligence itself.#
But here’s the kicker: these priests don’t come from some neutral plane of wisdom. They’re products of two rival schools of thought, two sects that dominate America’s legal theology. On one side, you’ve got the originalists—think Federalist Society types like Scalia or Thomas—who treat the Constitution like it’s frozen in 1789, a relic to be preserved in amber. Words mean what they meant back then, and if the founders didn’t imagine it, tough luck. On the other side, the living constitutionalists—call them the progressive wing, like Ginsburg or Sotomayor—see the document as a breathing thing, evolving with the times. Same text, totally different gods.
Now, look at the numbers. As of February 28, 2025, the Supreme Court’s got six justices appointed by Republican presidents (mostly originalists) and three by Democrats (mostly progressives). That’s not a coincidence—it’s a stacked deck. Presidents don’t pick justices for their brilliance; they pick them for their ideology. Reagan, Bush, Trump—they’ve loaded the bench with Federalist Society grads who’ve spent decades marinating in originalist dogma. Obama, Clinton, Biden? They’ve countered with their own acolytes, but the math hasn’t favored them lately. When Trump got three picks in one term—Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett—the game tilted hard. The house, in this case, being the conservative orthodoxy.
It’s not just the appointments; it’s the pipeline. The Federalist Society, founded in 1982, isn’t some book club—it’s a machine, grooming lawyers, clerks, and judges for the altar of originalism. They’ve got donors, conferences, and a hit list of “approved” candidates ready for any vacancy. The progressive side? They’ve got their own networks—think American Constitution Society—but they’re playing catch-up, less organized, less ruthless. When a justice dies or retires, it’s not a meritocracy; it’s a power play. The president and Senate roll the dice, but the schools of thought hold the cards.
So what’s the result? A Supreme Court that’s less about justice and more about whose theology reigns supreme. Take Dobbs v. Jackson in 2022—overturning Roe v. Wade wasn’t just a legal call; it was a sermon from the originalist pulpit, preached by Alito and his choir. Or look at Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard in 2023, axing affirmative action—another victory for the “colorblind Constitution” crowd. The progressive dissenters wail, but they’re outvoted. The house wins again.
Does this make America a religion? Hell yes, if you squint. We’ve got rituals (elections, oaths), martyrs (Lincoln, MLK), and a clergy that’s untouchable—impeach a justice? Good luck. But if it’s a religion, it’s a rigged one. The justices aren’t divinely inspired; they’re politically installed. And when one sect—right now, the originalists—holds the majority, the Constitution stops being a living debate and becomes their gospel alone. The rest of us? We’re just congregants, praying the next vacancy flips the table. But don’t hold your breath—the house has deep pockets and a long memory.
Show code cell source
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx
# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
return {
'Suis': ['Foundational', 'Grammar', 'Nourish It', 'Know It', "Move It", 'Injure It'], # Static
'Voir': ['Gate-Nutrition'],
'Choisis': ['Prioritize-Lifestyle', 'Basal Metabolic Rate'],
'Deviens': ['Unstructured-Intense', 'Weekly-Calendar', 'Refine-Training'],
"M'èléve": ['NexToken Prediction', 'Hydration', 'Fat-Muscle Ratio', 'Visceral-Fat', 'Existential Cadence']
}
# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
color_map = {
'yellow': ['Gate-Nutrition'],
'paleturquoise': ['Injure It', 'Basal Metabolic Rate', 'Refine-Training', 'Existential Cadence'],
'lightgreen': ["Move It", 'Weekly-Calendar', 'Hydration', 'Visceral-Fat', 'Fat-Muscle Ratio'],
'lightsalmon': ['Nourish It', 'Know It', 'Prioritize-Lifestyle', 'Unstructured-Intense', 'NexToken Prediction'],
}
return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}
# Define edge weights (hardcoded for editing)
def define_edges():
return {
('Foundational', 'Gate-Nutrition'): '1/99',
('Grammar', 'Gate-Nutrition'): '5/95',
('Nourish It', 'Gate-Nutrition'): '20/80',
('Know It', 'Gate-Nutrition'): '51/49',
("Move It", 'Gate-Nutrition'): '80/20',
('Injure It', 'Gate-Nutrition'): '95/5',
('Gate-Nutrition', 'Prioritize-Lifestyle'): '20/80',
('Gate-Nutrition', 'Basal Metabolic Rate'): '80/20',
('Prioritize-Lifestyle', 'Unstructured-Intense'): '49/51',
('Prioritize-Lifestyle', 'Weekly-Calendar'): '80/20',
('Prioritize-Lifestyle', 'Refine-Training'): '95/5',
('Basal Metabolic Rate', 'Unstructured-Intense'): '5/95',
('Basal Metabolic Rate', 'Weekly-Calendar'): '20/80',
('Basal Metabolic Rate', 'Refine-Training'): '51/49',
('Unstructured-Intense', 'NexToken Prediction'): '80/20',
('Unstructured-Intense', 'Hydration'): '85/15',
('Unstructured-Intense', 'Fat-Muscle Ratio'): '90/10',
('Unstructured-Intense', 'Visceral-Fat'): '95/5',
('Unstructured-Intense', 'Existential Cadence'): '99/1',
('Weekly-Calendar', 'NexToken Prediction'): '1/9',
('Weekly-Calendar', 'Hydration'): '1/8',
('Weekly-Calendar', 'Fat-Muscle Ratio'): '1/7',
('Weekly-Calendar', 'Visceral-Fat'): '1/6',
('Weekly-Calendar', 'Existential Cadence'): '1/5',
('Refine-Training', 'NexToken Prediction'): '1/99',
('Refine-Training', 'Hydration'): '5/95',
('Refine-Training', 'Fat-Muscle Ratio'): '10/90',
('Refine-Training', 'Visceral-Fat'): '15/85',
('Refine-Training', 'Existential Cadence'): '20/80'
}
# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]
# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
layers = define_layers()
colors = assign_colors()
edges = define_edges()
G = nx.DiGraph()
pos = {}
node_colors = []
# Create mapping from original node names to numbered labels
mapping = {}
counter = 1
for layer in layers.values():
for node in layer:
mapping[node] = f"{counter}. {node}"
counter += 1
# Add nodes with new numbered labels and assign positions
for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
new_node = mapping[node]
G.add_node(new_node, layer=layer_name)
pos[new_node] = position
node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))
# Add edges with updated node labels
for (source, target), weight in edges.items():
if source in mapping and target in mapping:
new_source = mapping[source]
new_target = mapping[target]
G.add_edge(new_source, new_target, weight=weight)
# Draw the graph
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
edges_labels = {(u, v): d["weight"] for u, v, d in G.edges(data=True)}
nx.draw(
G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
)
nx.draw_networkx_edge_labels(G, pos, edge_labels=edges_labels, font_size=8)
plt.title("OPRAH™: Efficiency", fontsize=25)
plt.show()
# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()


Fig. 15 Nostalgia & Romanticism. When monumental ends (victory, optimization, time, recovery), antiquarian means (war, combinatorial-search, space, dynamic-capability), and critical justification (bloodshed, massive, agency, enurance) were all compressed into one figure-head: hero. This yellow node is our nostalgia for when we were younger, more vibrant.#