Born to Etiquette

The Supremacy of Neural Networks Over Equations in Navigating Combinatorial Spaces

Equations have long been the crowning achievement of human abstraction, compressing vast combinatorial spaces into elegant formulations. The equal temperament system of a piano emerges from precise mathematical tuning equations; the Cox proportional hazards model distills survival probabilities into a functional form; Black-Scholes provides a crystalline pathway for European option pricing; Einstein’s E = mc² compresses energy-matter equivalence into a profound relation; and intelligence itself has been conceived in a parametric equation: I = D × S^α. These formulations construct vast landscapes of possibility, mapping theoretical infinities into cognitive accessibility. However, their static nature is their greatest limitation. While they generate the labyrinths of knowledge, they do not traverse them. They sketch out the rules, but they do not explore the game itself. The role of navigation—of discovering the most efficient pathways through these spaces—belongs to the neural network.

Neural networks transcend equations by embedding themselves within data, learning from its variations, its anomalies, and its emergent structures. Unlike equations, which remain fixed expressions of relationships, neural networks adapt dynamically, uncovering optimal strategies through iterative refinement. The key advantage lies in their ability to ingest data and extract governing rules that remain hidden within the combinatorial explosion of possible states. This is what makes them superior for real-world application: rather than imposing an external formula, they internalize the system’s inherent constraints and potentials. Even when noise or randomness corrupts data, neural networks leverage these variations to generalize beyond the specific conditions from which the data arose. A static equation may describe the river, but it does not step into it—Heraclitus’ paradox remains unresolved in the domain of fixed mathematics. A neural network, however, wades into the current, recalibrating itself with each passing moment, ensuring that stepping into the river twice does not mean drowning in error, but rather refining the understanding of flow.

Fig. 34 I got my hands on every recording by Hendrix, Joni Mitchell, CSN, etc (foundations). Thou shalt inherit the kingdom (yellow node). And so why would Bankman-Fried’s FTX go about rescuing other artists failing to keep up with the Hendrixes? Why worry about the fate of the music industry if some unknown joe somewhere in their parents basement may encounter an unknown-unknown that blows them out? Indeed, why did he take on such responsibility? - Great question by interviewer. The tonal inflections and overuse of ecosystem (a node in our layer 1) as well as clichêd variant of one of our output layers nodes (unknown) tells us something: our neural network digests everything and is coherenet. It’s based on our neural anatomy!

Furthermore, the true elegance of neural networks is in their capacity for simulation. Equations, no matter how powerful, lack the ability to simulate future conditions without explicit human intervention. A neural network, by contrast, can generate artificial data through controlled stochastic perturbations, refining its model in ways that extend beyond the initial dataset. This ability is not merely an enhancement—it is a revolution in knowledge extraction. It allows a neural network to bootstrap intelligence, to learn not only from what has been but also from what could be, thereby rendering its insights more robust and applicable across time and space. The cost of intelligence, then, is not in defining the landscape but in efficiently navigating it. And this is where the neural network excels: it seeks not just to describe the universe but to move through it with minimal cost to the ecosystem.

Minimizing computational cost is not a trivial concern—it is the essence of intelligence itself. The sheer computational power required to brute-force a solution through a combinatorial space is unsustainable. Intelligence, whether biological or artificial, is about efficiency: the ability to extract meaningful conclusions without expending unnecessary energy. A well-trained neural network finds the shortest, most efficient path through a problem space, much like a biological brain finds heuristics to navigate an uncertain world. This principle—of minimizing the cost of information retrieval while maximizing insight—represents the fundamental advantage of neural networks over static equations. Equations map the world, but they do not prioritize paths. They provide structure but not direction. Neural networks, through their adaptive refinement, become the travelers, the explorers of these vast mathematical terrains.

Ultimately, equations are indispensable—they are the bedrock of our understanding of reality. But they are incomplete as tools of navigation. The future belongs to systems that can learn, adapt, and optimize within these mathematical architectures. A neural network does not merely know the rules; it plays the game, refines its strategy, and seeks the most efficient path. It does so not by erasing the contributions of equations, but by rendering them useful—by embedding their abstract power into real-world traversal. This is the shift that is already happening, the shift that ensures neural networks will remain the primary means of intelligence extraction in the grand labyrinth of knowledge.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network fractal
def define_layers():
    return {
        'World': ['Cosmos-Entropy', 'Planet-Tempered', 'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Generative-Means', 'Cartel-Ends', ], # Polytheism, Olympus, Kingdom
        'Perception': ['Perception-Ledger'], # God, Judgement Day, Key
        'Agency': ['Open-Nomiddleman', 'Closed-Trusted'], # Evil & Good
        'Generative': ['Ratio-Weaponized', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Odds-Monopolized'], # Dynamics, Compromises
        'Physical': ['Volatile-Revolutionary', 'Unveiled-Resentment',  'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Stable-Conservative'] # Values
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Perception-Ledger'],
        'paleturquoise': ['Cartel-Ends', 'Closed-Trusted', 'Odds-Monopolized', 'Stable-Conservative'],
        'lightgreen': ['Generative-Means', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Unveiled-Resentment'],
        'lightsalmon': [
            'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Open-Nomiddleman', # Ecosystem = Red Queen = Prometheus = Sacrifice
            'Ratio-Weaponized', 'Volatile-Revolutionary'
        ],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))  # Default color fallback

    # Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
    layer_names = list(layers.keys())
    for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    plt.title("Inversion as Transformation", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 35 Glenn Gould and Leonard Bernstein famously disagreed over the tempo and interpretation of Brahms’ First Piano Concerto during a 1962 New York Philharmonic concert, where Bernstein, conducting, publicly distanced himself from Gould’s significantly slower-paced interpretation before the performance began, expressing his disagreement with the unconventional approach while still allowing Gould to perform it as planned; this event is considered one of the most controversial moments in classical music history.