Duality

Waltz

The rhythm of 5/4 time is an unsteady pulse, a gait that refuses the predictable march of common time. It stumbles forward with insistence, always aware that its own balance is a construct rather than an inevitability. In this asymmetric cadence, we find the compression of history, the warping of narrative layers into one singular force: the hero. To walk this rhythm is to experience Nietzsche’s Uses and Abuses of History in real-time. Monumental, antiquarian, and critical histories, which he defines as the ways we engage with the past, collapse into a singular axis when the pulse demands it. We see this compression in figures like Henry V, where the justifications of war, the weight of the past, and the march toward conquest are subsumed under the rhetoric of a king who fuses honor with necessity. But this is not merely Shakespeare’s Henry; it is a model for influence itself, from the guest on Joe Rogan’s podcast to the gravitational force of his audience.

Fig. 15 Trump vs. Jules. The juxtaposition of Donald Trump and Jules Winnfield from “Pulp Fiction” is as perplexing as it is intriguing. Jules, portrayed by Samuel L. Jackson, is a philosophical hitman who undergoes a profound transformation after a near-death experience, leading him to question his violent lifestyle and seek redemption. In contrast, Trump, a figure entrenched in the worlds of business and politics, often exhibits a brash and unyielding demeanor, seemingly impervious to introspection or change.

The network of influence unfolds in layers. First, the indicator, the Veni, is the guest—a voice entering the system, unshaped, untested, but present. This is the anomaly that breaks into discourse, a node unclaimed by the larger architecture. Joe Rogan himself, the influencer, embodies the Vidi, the interpreter of information, the arbiter of relevance who decides what is seen and what is amplified. He does not merely reflect the world; he shapes it through iterative reinforcement, tuning the feedback loops of public perception. Finally, the audience—the impacted—becomes the full expression of Veni-Vidi-Vici. It is the moment when the echo chamber ceases to be an abstraction and becomes an army. Here, in the completion of the sequence, we see the Nietzschean conundrum: the hero emerges, but so too does the war that justifies him. Influence does not move in a straight line; it expands radially, consuming the past and reframing it in terms of the present victory.

I read Henry Percy with a great deal of excitement and anger.
– Teenage Nietzsche

This network is more than metaphor—it is structure. In the visualization of a neural network, we see the layers of influence mapped onto the inevitabilities of history. The static layer, Suis, represents the fundamental conditions of the narrative: fewer men, greater honor, and the stakes of loss. This is the battleground of historical justification, where honor is transfigured into necessity. From this foundation emerges Voir, the single point of information that determines whether a narrative survives or dissipates. Choisis marks the threshold of action, where interpretation gives way to selection, much like the role of an influencer in consolidating meaning. Deviens encodes the ramifications, the aftershocks of influence that manifest in tangible, adverse effects—comorbidities of the discourse, temporal distortions that ripple outward. The final layer, M’éléve, is consequence: the mortality of ideas, the collapse of health, the physical frailty of truth under sustained pressure.

Henry V’s speech before Agincourt is an articulation of this structure, an algorithm in words. The logic of influence, whether in historical figures or media landscapes, is recursive: it loops back, feeding upon its own triumphs until it cannot distinguish between what was inevitable and what was constructed. The line between antiquarian reverence and monumental manipulation blurs, and the hero emerges not as a figure of destiny but as the product of a system finely tuned to manufacture him. In the end, victory is a compression algorithm, reducing complexity to a single, repeatable phrase: Veni, Vidi, Vici. But the rhythm of history is 5/4—it never truly resolves, never truly ends. It only demands another iteration.

Jazz

The juxtaposition of Donald Trump and Jules Winnfield from “Pulp Fiction” is as perplexing as it is intriguing. Jules, portrayed by Samuel L. Jackson, is a philosophical hitman who undergoes a profound transformation after a near-death experience, leading him to question his violent lifestyle and seek redemption. In contrast, Trump, a figure entrenched in the worlds of business and politics, often exhibits a brash and unyielding demeanor, seemingly impervious to introspection or change. While Jules embarks on a journey toward enlightenment, Trump’s persona is marked by a steadfast adherence to his own narrative, rarely displaying the vulnerability or self-reflection that characterizes Jules’s evolution. This stark contrast highlights the divergent paths of a fictional character seeking meaning and a real-life individual driven by ambition and self-assuredness.

Piers Morgan’s assertion that the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Pennsylvania led to a transformation in his demeanor is unfounded. In reality, Trump’s rhetoric has become increasingly vitriolic and divisive since the incident. The July 13, 2024, attempt on his life during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where he sustained a minor injury to his right ear, did not temper his approach. Instead, Trump has amplified his combative stance, using the event to galvanize his base and portray himself as a resilient figure undeterred by adversity. This strategy has further polarized the political landscape, contradicting any claims of a softened or transformed persona.

It confirms what has long been evident—Piers Morgan thrives on manufactured narratives and opportunistic pivots. His claim that the assassination attempt transformed Trump is not just intellectually lazy; it’s transparently sycophantic. Morgan has spent years oscillating between criticizing and fawning over Trump, always recalibrating his stance based on what garners him the most attention.

If Trump had genuinely softened, there might have been a discussion to be had. But since the attempt, he has doubled down on his most divisive rhetoric, using the event as a rallying cry to further stoke political enmity. Morgan’s take isn’t just wrong—it’s actively deceptive, an attempt to push a feel-good redemption arc onto a figure who has never shown the capacity for genuine transformation.

Ultimately, it reveals Morgan for what he is: a media opportunist who prioritizes dramatic storytelling over reality, always positioning himself as a contrarian with just enough plausible deniability to backtrack when necessary.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Suis': ['Fewer Men', 'Greater Honor', 'And If To Live', 'Country Loss', "If We Are Mark’d", 'To Die, We Enough'],  # Static
        'Voir': ['Information'],  
        'Choisis': ['Baseline', 'Decision'],  
        'Deviens': ['Adverse Event Markers', 'Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Temporal Changes'],  
        "M'èléve": ['Mortality Rate', 'Organ Failure', 'Hospitalization', 'Dependency', 'Physical Frailty']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Information'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['To Die, We Enough', 'Decision', 'Temporal Changes', 'Physical Frailty'],  
        'lightgreen': ["If We Are Mark’d", 'Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Organ Failure', 'Dependency', 'Hospitalization'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['And If To Live', 'Country Loss', 'Baseline', 'Adverse Event Markers', 'Mortality Rate'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edge weights (hardcoded for editing)
def define_edges():
    return {
        ('Fewer Men', 'Information'): '1/99',
        ('Greater Honor', 'Information'): '5/95',
        ('And If To Live', 'Information'): '20/80',
        ('Country Loss', 'Information'): '51/49',
        ("If We Are Mark’d", 'Information'): '80/20',
        ('To Die, We Enough', 'Information'): '95/5',
        ('Information', 'Baseline'): '20/80',
        ('Information', 'Decision'): '80/20',
        ('Baseline', 'Adverse Event Markers'): '49/51',
        ('Baseline', 'Comorbidity/ICD Code'): '80/20',
        ('Baseline', 'Temporal Changes'): '95/5',
        ('Decision', 'Adverse Event Markers'): '5/95',
        ('Decision', 'Comorbidity/ICD Code'): '20/80',
        ('Decision', 'Temporal Changes'): '51/49',
        ('Adverse Event Markers', 'Mortality Rate'): '80/20',
        ('Adverse Event Markers', 'Organ Failure'): '85/15',
        ('Adverse Event Markers', 'Hospitalization'): '90/10',
        ('Adverse Event Markers', 'Dependency'): '95/5',
        ('Adverse Event Markers', 'Physical Frailty'): '99/1',
        ('Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Mortality Rate'): '1/9',
        ('Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Organ Failure'): '1/8',
        ('Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Hospitalization'): '1/7',
        ('Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Dependency'): '1/6',
        ('Comorbidity/ICD Code', 'Physical Frailty'): '1/5',
        ('Temporal Changes', 'Mortality Rate'): '1/99',
        ('Temporal Changes', 'Organ Failure'): '5/95',
        ('Temporal Changes', 'Hospitalization'): '10/90',
        ('Temporal Changes', 'Dependency'): '15/85',
        ('Temporal Changes', 'Physical Frailty'): '20/80'
    }

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    
    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))   
    
    # Add edges with weights
    for (source, target), weight in edges.items():
        if source in G.nodes and target in G.nodes:
            G.add_edge(source, target, weight=weight)
    
    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    edges_labels = {(u, v): d["weight"] for u, v, d in G.edges(data=True)}
    
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=15, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    nx.draw_networkx_edge_labels(G, pos, edge_labels=edges_labels, font_size=8)
    plt.title("Indicator, Influencer, Impacted", fontsize=23)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 16 Tryptophan, Tryptamine, and Y’all Who Be Trippin’. Information in nature is encoded in gravity and photons and zapped from the cosmos, to earth, to life, to silicon. As for the point of view, thats open for discourse. Source: Lorenzo Expeditions. And if we invert all the aforementioned, then we might say something like: The code provides a unique blend of art and science, creating a visual narrative that might engage viewers in thinking about the structure of thought, decision-making, or the whimsical nature of reality as depicted in “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” - Grok-2.