Resource

The founding of the modern Jewish state in the 20th century marked an extraordinary return to the Levant as both a geographic and symbolic node. After millennia in the diaspora, the Jewish people had lived under the weight of dislocation, subjugation, and survival through priestly morality—a mode of existence that Nietzsche critiqued as a strategy of the powerless, a way to endure by transcending the physical. Yet, the foundation of Israel under the British Mandate carried a sharp historical irony: the intellectual inspiration for its resurrection often drew from Nietzsche’s ideas, particularly his challenge to the suffocating effects of priestly morality and his call for a return to life-affirming, warrior virtues.

The creation of Israel was not simply a political project; it was an existential upheaval, a deliberate shift back toward the warrior ethos. This return to Nietzschean principles was driven not just by the necessity of survival in a hostile environment but by a conscious desire to reclaim agency after centuries of exile and persecution. The Zionist movement, shaped by the realities of modern geopolitics and inspired by Nietzsche’s critique of moral decay, sought to restore the Jewish people to a position of strength—both physically and spiritually. The establishment of the state in 1948 symbolized the realization of this vision: a warrior morality reasserted as a response to historical vulnerability.

This transformation, however, did not occur in a vacuum. The Levant, as Nietzsche might have recognized, was still the Red Queen’s playground—a region where survival required constant adaptation in the face of unyielding competition. The events of October 7, 2023, and the response by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, represent the apotheosis of this warrior morality. The attack on Israel by Hamas was not only an act of violence but also a direct challenge to the equilibrium Israel had fought to maintain. Netanyahu’s response, marked by overwhelming military action and a renewed sense of existential clarity, reflects a nation fully committed to the warrior ethos as its guiding principle.

In this context, Israel’s trajectory mirrors the dynamic at the heart of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. The Levant remains a crucible of competition, where no equilibrium—whether rooted in priestly or warrior morality—can endure unchallenged. The modern Jewish state has embraced the Red Queen dynamic, recognizing that survival demands not only strength but also the willingness to adapt and confront threats head-on. Yet, this raises profound questions about the long-term consequences of such a posture. Does the warrior morality, in its relentless pursuit of survival, risk breeding the same decadence that Nietzsche associated with priestly morality?

The history of the Levant suggests that no single strategy, however robust, can escape the cycles of adaptation and disruption. Just as priestly morality succumbed to external conquest in ancient Judea, the modern reliance on military strength carries its own vulnerabilities. Israel’s response to October 7th underscores its ability to dominate the immediate competition, but it also highlights the Red Queen’s eternal truth: even the strongest nodes in the network must eventually reckon with the costs of their survival strategies.

The return to the warrior ethos in modern Israel is, without question, a historic reclamation of agency and identity. It reflects a deep understanding of the Levant’s unforgiving dynamics and an acknowledgment that survival in this region requires strength, resilience, and clarity of purpose. Yet, the long shadow of history reminds us that the Levant’s role as the Red Queen’s playground leaves no room for complacency. The true challenge lies not in winning the immediate battles but in shaping a strategy that can endure the cycles of adaptation and competition that define this ancient and relentless node of human civilization.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network structure; modified to align with "Aprés Moi, Le Déluge" (i.e. Je suis AlexNet)
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Physics': ['Cosmos', 'Earth', 'Life', 'Resources', 'Means', 'Ends'], # CUDA & AlexNet
        'Metaphysics': ['Nostalgia'], # Perception AI
        'Decisions': ['Bad', 'Good'], # Agentic AI "Test-Time Scaling" (as opposed to Pre-Trained -Data Scaling & Post-Trained -RLHF)
        'Games': ['David', 'Old & New Morality', 'Solomon'], # Generative AI (Plan/Cooperative/Monumental, Tool Use/Iterative/Antiquarian, Critique/Adversarial/Critical)
        'Outcomes': ['Levant', 'Imposthume', 'Priestly', 'Wisdom', 'Temple'] # Physical AI (Calculator, Web Search, SQL Search, Generate Podcast)
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors(node, layer):
    if node == 'Nostalgia': ## Cranial Nerve Ganglia & Dorsal Root Ganglia
        return 'yellow'
    if layer == 'Physics' and node in ['Ends']:
        return 'paleturquoise'
    if layer == 'Physics' and node in ['Means']:
        return 'lightgreen'
    elif layer == 'Decisions' and node == 'Good': # Basal Ganglia, Thalamus, Hypothalamus; N4, N5: Brainstem, Cerebellum
        return 'paleturquoise'
    elif layer == 'Games':
        if node == 'Solomon':
            return 'paleturquoise'
        elif node == 'Old & New Morality': # Autonomic Ganglia (ACh)
            return 'lightgreen'
        elif node == 'David':
            return 'lightsalmon'
    elif layer == 'Outcomes':
        if node == 'Temple':
            return 'paleturquoise'
        elif node in ['Wisdom', 'Priestly', 'Imposthume']:
            return 'lightgreen'
        elif node == 'Levant':
            return 'lightsalmon'
    return 'lightsalmon'  # Default color

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, center_x, offset):
    layer_size = len(layer)
    start_y = -(layer_size - 1) / 2  # Center the layer vertically
    return [(center_x + offset, start_y + i) for i in range(layer_size)]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    center_x = 0  # Align nodes horizontally

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        y_positions = calculate_positions(nodes, center_x, offset=-len(layers) + i + 1)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, y_positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(assign_colors(node, layer_name))

    # Add edges (without weights)
    for layer_pair in [
        ('Physics', 'Metaphysics'), ('Metaphysics', 'Decisions'), ('Decisions', 'Games'), ('Games', 'Outcomes')
    ]:
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_pair
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=10, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.1"
    )
    plt.title("Red Queen Hypothesis\n Red/Biology, Green/Sociology, Blue/Psychology\n Yellow/Reincarnation", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 19 G1, G2, G3 are Dorsal-Root, Cranial Nerve, and Autonomic. N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, are Basal Ganglia (caudate, putament, globus pallidus, subthalamic, substantia nigra), Thalamus (eg lateral geniculate), Hypothalamus, Brainstem, Cerebellum (dentate). The centrality of acetyle choline in the neural network might explain the coevolution of swaths of the ecosystem, that release venoms and toxins that target ACh-ligand-gated receptors. This model stands as both a neuroanatomical map and an ecological narrative. It aligns well with evolutionary theory and has applications spanning neuroscience, pharmacology, and ecological systems. Refining the naming conventions and visual clarity would enhance its didactic potential. Our essay has a strong conceptual foundation, linking Nietzsche’s philosophy with the Red Queen Hypothesis and neural networks. We incorporate a neural network analogy seamlessly into Nietzsche’s philosophical narrative, ensuring coherence while critiquing reductionist tendencies in both frameworks. It also aligns with our emphasis on vivid imagery and interconnected ideas, capturing Nietzsche’s existential dynamism alongside evolutionary and structural insights.