Base

Anxiety of Influence

What you’re sketching here is an odyssey through a labyrinthine universe, where every node and edge, every combinatorial path, is both a literal network of biological constraints and an infinite metaphysical playground. This duality—bound by our neural architecture but unbound in the realm of creative exploration—creates the space where Harold Bloom’s anxiety of influence thrives.

Bloom’s six revisionary ratios are the tools of navigation through this maze. They’re not just methods of poetic survival but frameworks for compressing vast ancestral wisdom into something metabolizable by the modern psyche. Each ratio is a strategy for navigating the overwhelming combinatorial possibilities:

1. Clinamen (The Swerve): A poetic reweighting mechanism. In machine learning, it’s akin to altering weights to steer the neural network into novel, unexplored territories. Lucretius’ swerve mirrors the moment a protagonist, a composer, or even a neuron chooses a divergent path, creating new possibilities from deterministic patterns.

2. Tessera (Completion and Antithesis): This is a cooperative node. The tessera completes the precursor, yet redefines its terms—just as neural networks refine their outputs through iterative feedback. This ratio acknowledges that all creativity is a dialogue with the past, a recombination of inherited tokens.

3. Kenosis (Self-Emptying): The breaking device reminds me of dropout in neural networks—purposefully introducing discontinuity to prevent overfitting. By humbling the precursor and oneself, kenosis creates a void where new patterns can emerge. It’s the poetic equivalent of entropy, a necessary chaos for creation.

4. Daemonization (Counter-Sublime): Here, we reach into the adversarial realm, invoking forces beyond the known precursor. Daemonization seeks to destabilize the hierarchy of influence, creating a dynamic feedback loop between the Sublime and its counterforce. It’s akin to adversarial networks in AI—pitting models against each other to reach higher resolutions.

5. Askesis (Self-Purgation): The isolation of askesis resembles a meditation node in the labyrinth. By stripping away excess, the poet achieves solitude, but also clarity—compressing the combinatorial maze into a singular, individuated path.

6. Apophrades (Return of the Dead): This final ratio feels like a recursive function, where past and future merge in uncanny synchronicity. It’s the ultimate compression—so seamless that the precursor seems derivative of the successor. In neural terms, it’s the moment the model’s output mirrors the training data but transcends it through deliberate refinement.

Bloom’s anxiety of influence isn’t just poetic—it’s biological, computational, and existential. It mirrors the way we compress time, space, and infinite possibilities into something humanly digestible. This compression, whether through music, psychoactive exploration, or Bloomian revision, is an odyssey toward meaning in the vast labyrinth of existence. The “new vocabulary” you mention—whether born of ChatGPT or Romantic poets—is itself a Bloomian tessera, a fragment that reconstructs the whole.

Bloom teaches us that the maze isn’t just a place to get lost—it’s a place to swerve, complete, break, daemonize, purge, and resurrect. And as you beautifully articulate, this isn’t just about poets or composers but about all of us navigating the combinatorial explosion of life itself.

Combinatorial Explosion

Thank you for that observation. The metaphor of the combinatorial explosion as a cosmic echo of the Big Bang is electrifying—it captures the spirit of existence as an unfolding, infinite elaboration of possibility. It’s not merely excess for its own sake but an incessant proliferation of forms, patterns, and relationships. In this sense, life and humanity are not just passive outcomes of this explosion; they are its most concentrated agents, its most dynamic instantiations.

When Nietzsche declared, “I am dynamite,” he wasn’t just proclaiming himself an explosive force; he was affirming his role as a disruptor within this ongoing explosion. Nietzsche understood that creation often necessitates destruction—of old forms, old values, old systems. Dynamite doesn’t just destroy; it clears space for something new, something unprecedented. In this way, Nietzsche is a microcosm of the Big Bang—a concentrated energy that detonates into a vast horizon of possibilities.

Your linking of the Big Bang to technological progress is especially poignant. Each step in our technological evolution has been a localized Big Bang, a moment of dynamite detonating within the combinatorial maze of our creativity. The printing press, the steam engine, the microchip, neural networks—they are not merely tools but vectors of explosive expansion, creating new combinatorial spaces for humanity to explore. Each technology, like the universe itself, gives rise to excess: new questions, new challenges, new opportunities.

This excess is not without its dangers. The deluge, après moi, la deluge, reminds us that unchecked expansion carries the risk of drowning in our own creations, overwhelmed by the very variations we sought to master. Yet it is also a reminder that the flood—the infinite combinatorial excess—is not a threat to life but its essence. Life is adaptation to variation, finding harmony within the chaos, and thriving in the flood of possibilities.

In this way, Nietzsche’s dynamite and the Big Bang are not just forces of destruction or creation but the same force viewed through different lenses. They remind us that we are part of this explosion, agents within it, capable of swerving like Lucretius’ atoms or creating tesserae to build upon the fragments left by those before us. Whether through art, science, or technology, we are the universe’s dynamite—its agents of proliferation, its champions of variation, its poets of the infinite.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network structure
def define_layers():
    return {
        # Divine and narrative framework in the film
        'World': [
            'Cosmos',  # Guido’s grand, universal sense of play and creativity
            'Earth',  # The tangible and oppressive reality of the Holocaust
            'Life',  # The stakes of survival and human connection
            'Il Sacrificio',  # Guido’s ultimate sacrifice
            'Mia Storia',  # Giosuè’s personal narrative, shaped by his father
            'Dono Per Me'  # The "gift" of innocence and joy given by Guido
        ],
        # Perception and filtering of reality
        'Perception': ['Che Mio'],  # How Giosuè interprets his father’s actions and words
        # Agency and Guido’s defining traits
        'Agency': ['Cheerfulness', 'Optimism'],  # Guido’s tools for shaping the narrative
        # Generativity and legacy
        'Generativity': [
            'Anarchy',  # Guido’s rebellion against oppressive reality
            'Oligarchy',  # The systemic constraints he navigates
            'Padre Fece'  # The actions and sacrifices Guido made for his son
        ],
        # Physical realities and their interplay
        'Physicality': [
            'Dynamic',  # Guido’s improvisational actions, like creating the “game”
            'Partisan',  # The direct oppression he faces
            'Common Wealth',  # Shared humanity and joy despite hardship
            'Non-Partisan',  # Universal themes transcending sides
            'Static'  # The immovable, tragic finality of the Holocaust
        ]
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors(node, layer):
    if node == 'Che Mio':
        return 'yellow'  # Perception as the interpretive bridge
    if layer == 'World' and node == 'Dono Per Me':
        return 'paleturquoise'  # Optimism and the "gift"
    if layer == 'World' and node == 'Mia Storia':
        return 'lightgreen'  # Harmony and legacy
    if layer == 'World' and node in ['Cosmos', 'Earth']:
        return 'lightgray'  # Context of divine and tangible
    elif layer == 'Agency' and node == 'Optimism':
        return 'paleturquoise'  # Guido’s defining hope
    elif layer == 'Generativity':
        if node == 'Padre Fece':
            return 'paleturquoise'  # Guido’s ultimate acts of selflessness
        elif node == 'Oligarchy':
            return 'lightgreen'  # Navigating systemic structures
        elif node == 'Anarchy':
            return 'lightsalmon'  # Rebellion and creativity
    elif layer == 'Physicality':
        if node == 'Static':
            return 'paleturquoise'  # The unchanging, tragic realities
        elif node in ['Non-Partisan', 'Common Wealth', 'Partisan']:
            return 'lightgreen'  # Shared humanity and resilience
        elif node == 'Dynamic':
            return 'lightsalmon'  # Guido’s improvisation and vitality
    return 'lightsalmon'  # Default color for tension or conflict

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, center_x, offset):
    layer_size = len(layer)
    start_y = -(layer_size - 1) / 2  # Center the layer vertically
    return [(center_x + offset, start_y + i) for i in range(layer_size)]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    center_x = 0  # Align nodes horizontally

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        y_positions = calculate_positions(nodes, center_x, offset=-len(layers) + i + 1)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, y_positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(assign_colors(node, layer_name))

    # Add edges (without weights)
    for layer_pair in [
        ('World', 'Perception'),  # Giosuè interprets the "World" through "Che Mio"
        ('Perception', 'Agency'),  # Guido’s cheerfulness shapes Giosuè’s perception
        ('Agency', 'Generativity'),  # Guido’s optimism drives his generative actions
        ('Generativity', 'Physicality')  # His legacy plays out in the physical world
    ]:
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_pair
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(14, 10))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=10, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.1"
    )
    plt.title("Questa è la mia storia: Vita è Bella", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 16 From a Pianist View. Left hand voices the mode and defines harmony. Right hand voice leads freely extend and alter modal landscapes. In R&B that typically manifests as 9ths, 11ths, 13ths. Passing chords and leading notes are often chromatic in the genre. Music is evocative because it transmits information that traverses through a primeval pattern-recognizing architecture that demands a classification of what you confront as the sort for feeding & breeding or fight & flight. It’s thus a very high-risk, high-error business if successful. We may engage in pattern recognition in literature too: concluding by inspection but erroneously that his silent companion was engaged in mental composition he reflected on the pleasures derived from literature of instruction rather than of amusement as he himself had applied to the works of William Shakespeare more than once for the solution of difficult problems in imaginary or real life. Source: Ulysses