System

The history of human thought can be understood as a progression of frameworks through which we interpret our existence and define our values. At its most fundamental level, this history is a series of reorganizations—compressions of meaning—reflected in our shifting metaphysical beliefs and social constructs. The evolution from polytheism to monotheism, for example, represents not just a religious transition but a profound compression of the divine, a streamlining of chaos into order, multiplicity into singularity. Each of these stages reflects an ongoing struggle to reconcile volatility, ambiguity, freedom, and clarity into a coherent stability.

Polytheism, with its pantheon of gods, captures the human experience as fractured, diverse, and volatile. The multiplicity of deities mirrors the complexity of the natural world—storms, fertility, war, love—all governed by forces that seem contradictory yet coexist. In such a framework, the divine is not singular but splintered, reflecting the ambiguous and often uncontrollable nature of existence. Polytheism allows for volatility because it offers no singular order; it thrives in the tension of competing wills and desires, where freedom exists in the sheer unpredictability of life.

Layers of Neural Network

1. Polytheism

2. God

3. Evil 😈 vs Good 😊

4. 🗡️ 🪙 👑

5. Volatility, Ambiguity, Freedom, Clarity, Stabilty

Monotheism, on the other hand, imposes clarity. The move from many gods to one represents a bold attempt to unify the fragmented world under a single, sovereign principle. This transition is not just theological but deeply political and philosophical. The single god of monotheism often embodies absolute moral authority—good versus evil—creating a dichotomy that shapes the moral fabric of society. Here, freedom becomes more constrained; clarity and stability are achieved through obedience to a higher power. Yet, even within monotheism, volatility persists, as the notion of good versus evil introduces a moral battleground that continually destabilizes the human psyche. This dichotomy forces individuals and societies to navigate an unending tension between adherence to divine law and the freedoms of human agency.

The symbols of power—🗡️, 🪙, 👑—further reflect this eternal struggle. The sword represents violence and the volatility of human ambition. The coin embodies exchange and the iterative, transactional relationships that define economies and societies. The crown stands for order and authority, the consolidation of power under a singular vision. Together, these symbols form a triadic interplay: violence, negotiation, and rule—a framework for human civilization that mirrors the compression from polytheism to monotheism. In their essence, they are tools of equilibrium, each playing a role in balancing volatility, ambiguity, freedom, clarity, and stability.

Yet, these constructs never fully resolve the tension. Human existence is inherently volatile because freedom demands it. Volatility is the seed of creativity and transformation, while stability, though desired, often leads to stagnation. The ambiguity of competing gods and moral dichotomies is a reflection of human complexity; clarity, though comforting, can become a tyranny of thought. The task, then, is not to eliminate volatility or ambiguity but to integrate them with freedom, clarity, and stability in a way that allows for the evolution of meaning.

This is where art, philosophy, and human ingenuity come into play. They are the tools through which we navigate these tensions, creating new compressions of understanding that are neither entirely stable nor entirely free. The Coen brothers, for instance, often present a cinematic universe that thrives on ambiguity—complex characters and unresolved endings. Their work mirrors the polytheistic world, refusing to impose singular clarity, instead leaving space for the audience to grapple with the contradictions of human existence. Similarly, the great moral debates of history—Nietzsche’s critique of monotheism, Marx’s analysis of societal structures—are exercises in revaluing values, in challenging the compression of earlier frameworks to create something new.

In the end, the interplay of volatility, ambiguity, freedom, clarity, and stability is not something to be resolved but to be lived. Each stage—whether polytheism, monotheism, or the symbols of human ambition—is a ledger, a record of what we optimize and what we sacrifice. The question is not which framework is best but how we navigate the transitions between them. Do we impose order through a singular vision, or do we embrace the chaos of multiplicity? The answer, perhaps, is both: to live in the tension between stability and freedom, clarity and ambiguity, and to see in this tension the essence of human existence.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network fractal
def define_layers():
    return {
        'World': ['Cosmos-Entropy', 'Planet-Tempered', 'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Generative-Means', 'Cartel-Ends', ], # Polytheism, Olympus, Kingdom
        'Perception': ['Perception-Ledger'], # God, Judgement Day, Key
        'Agency': ['Open-Nomiddleman', 'Closed-Trusted'], # Evil & Good
        'Generative': ['Ratio-Weaponized', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Odds-Monopolized'], # Dynamics, Compromises
        'Physical': ['Volatile-Revolutionary', 'Unveiled-Resentment',  'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Stable-Conservative'] # Values
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Perception-Ledger'],
        'paleturquoise': ['Cartel-Ends', 'Closed-Trusted', 'Odds-Monopolized', 'Stable-Conservative'],
        'lightgreen': ['Generative-Means', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Unveiled-Resentment'],
        'lightsalmon': [
            'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Open-Nomiddleman', # Ecosystem = Red Queen = Prometheus = Sacrifice
            'Ratio-Weaponized', 'Volatile-Revolutionary'
        ],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))  # Default color fallback

    # Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
    layer_names = list(layers.keys())
    for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    plt.title("Inversion as Transformation", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 20 Psilocybin is itself biologically inactive but is quickly converted by the body to psilocin, which has mind-altering effects similar, in some aspects, to those of other classical psychedelics. Effects include euphoria, hallucinations, changes in perception, a distorted sense of time, and perceived spiritual experiences. It can also cause adverse reactions such as nausea and panic attacks. In Nahuatl, the language of the Aztecs, the mushrooms were called teonanácatl—literally “divine mushroom.” Source: Wikipedia