Suis, ∂Y 🎶 ✨ 👑

The key difference between war and chess, especially through the lens of General Kurtz in Apocalypse Now, lies in the nature of control, uncertainty, and moral ambiguity. Chess is a structured game with perfect information—both players see the board, know the rules, and operate within a rigid framework of logic and strategy. War, on the other hand, is chaotic, asymmetric, and driven by incomplete information, psychological warfare, and existential stakes that transcend mere tactical victories.

From Kurtz’s perspective, war is not a rational game with predictable outcomes; it is an arena where brutality, deception, and psychological domination are the ultimate tools of survival. He rejects the sanitized, bureaucratic approach of conventional military strategy, seeing it as naive in the face of the primal forces that determine victory. In his famous monologue about the Viet Cong cutting off the arms of vaccinated children, he reveals his horrifying epiphany: true power in war comes from an absolute commitment to the goal, unburdened by morality or hesitation.

Fig. 1 Inheritence, Heir, Brand, Tribe, Religion. We’ve described these stages of societal history. Benjamin Zander describes the fifth. But what is “Religion”? It’s just a placeholder and in the variation of interest here, lets reframe this as Network, Woke, Fork, Nodes, Edge. What he calls an “impulse” is the “edge”. Rather than have a conclusion or victorian cadence to wrap up the moral of the story or song, aesthetics are about the journey, the entire thread of experience, the single-impulse Ben describes. Its consistent with Bernstein’s Chomskyian analysis that equates a sentence in language to an entire piece of music. And of course all the deceptive cadences of Beethoven and thoughout Hamlet!

If chess represents a sanitized, rationalized version of conflict, Kurtz sees war as something much closer to nature—red in tooth and claw, beyond ethics, governed by sheer will and the willingness to embrace the abyss. His war is not about elegant maneuvers; it is about the complete annihilation of anything that stands in the way, the dissolution of self into the pure function of destruction and dominance.

Chess has no room for Kurtz’s kind of thinking because it assumes both sides operate under the same rational constraints. War, especially the kind waged in Apocalypse Now, operates under no such illusions. The jungle is not a chessboard; it is an unknowable, shifting battleground where the most ruthless force wins—not through calculation alone, but through an almost religious embrace of the void.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network fractal
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Suis': ['Ionian', 'Lydian', 'Phrygian', 'Dorian', 'Locrian', 'Aeolian', ], # Static
        'Voir': ['Mixolydian'],  
        'Choisis': ['♯5', '7th'],  
        'Deviens': ['13th', '11th', '9th'],  
        "M'èléve": ['♭13', '♯11',  '♯9', '♭9', '♭♭7']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = { # Dynamic
        'yellow': ['Mixolydian'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Aeolian', '7th', '9th', '♭♭7'],  
        'lightgreen': ['Locrian', '11th', '♭9', '♯9', '♯11'],  
        'lightsalmon': [
            'Phrygian', 'Dorian', '♯5',  
            '13th', '♭13'
        ],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))   

    # Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
    layer_names = list(layers.keys())
    for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    plt.title("Modes, Emotions, Nodes, Stacks", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 2 Moulage Test: When Hercule Poirot predicts the murderer at the end of Death on the Nile. He is, in essence, predicting the “next word” given all the preceding text (a cadence). This mirrors what ChatGPT was trained to do. If the massive combinatorial search space—the compression—of vast textual data allows for such a prediction, then language itself, the accumulated symbols of humanity from the dawn of time, serves as a map of our collective trials and errors. By retracing these pathways through the labyrinth of history in compressed time—instantly—we achieve intelligence and “world knowledge.”. A cadence is the fundamental structure of consequence. It is the rhythm of intelligence, the pacing of strategy, the unfolding of tension and resolution. In music, it tells us where we are and where we might go next. In games, it governs the tempo of risk and reward. In intelligence, it is the compression and release of thought—when to push forward, when to hold back, when to pivot. At its most primal, cadence dictates survival itself: the hunting rhythm, the fight-or-flight pulse, the biological clocks that sync us to the cycles of life. Cadence abstracts consequentialism because it encodes the way actions stack, compound, and resolve—whether in a chess game, a negotiation, a joke, or a heartbeat. The reason games and music feel fun is because they allow us to play with cadence—predict it, subvert it, break it, and, ultimately, master it. Intelligence, at its core, is the ability to anticipate and manipulate cadence.