nationalism

                                1. Voir/Richard II 
                                                  \ 
                            2. Savoir/Henry IV ->  4. Communication/Lord Cantebury -> 5. Mobilization/Decision to Make Claim -> 6. Outcomes/Battle of Agincourt
                                                  /
                                                  3. Pouvoir/Falstaff vs. Prince of Wales

Dionysus 1, 2, 3

• Interrupted “happiness” of all people who have been colonized by more organized nations with divine ambition puff’d
  • The Aztecs, Inca, Maya, Native Americans, Aborigines, and many other indigenous peoples experienced their own forms of structured societies and cultures, which were disrupted and often obliterated by the imperial ambitions of European powers. This “divine ambition” wasn’t just about religious zeal but a broader sense of manifest destiny and a drive for economic and territorial expansion.

O For a Muse of Fire 🔥 4

• Narrative and communication here is romantic, nationalist, and panafrican. Only appeals to the weak who have no say over the “melody” of human history
  • This perspective often glorifies a past that, while rich and complex, was not without its own struggles and conflicts. The idea of re-writing or “re-harmonizing” history can serve to empower those who feel marginalized but can also oversimplify the realities of historical and cultural dynamics.
• What we have is the opportunity to reharm this melody to smooth away dissonances and provide consonant harmonies and lullabies
  • The task of addressing historical injustices and creating a more harmonious future is undoubtedly complex. It involves recognizing past wrongs, understanding their lasting impacts, and working collaboratively to create a more equitable world. This requires more than just a romantic retelling; it needs actionable steps and inclusive dialogue.

Apollo 5, 6

• Timing of industrial revolution (1700s) & colonization of Africa (1900s) yields distinct qualities from Native (Canada), Aztek (North), Maya (Central), Inca (South), Aborigines (Australia), Chinese, Japanese, and other civilizations
  • The Industrial Revolution and the concurrent colonization of Africa indeed created a unique set of circumstances. While many societies were grappling with industrialization and its implications, Africa was being forcibly integrated into a global economic system that prioritized European industrial needs over local development.
• Africa may have been handed back its “sovereignty” but Europe’s industrialization would pick African produce higher up the value chain
  • The legacy of colonization continues to affect Africa’s economic landscape. While political sovereignty has been restored, economic structures often remain tilted in favor of former colonial powers. Raw materials are extracted and processed elsewhere, diminishing the value that remains within African economies.
• Museveni fails to link this to his other idea regarding African progression along: Hunter-gatherer, peasant, farmer, technology, electricity, transportation
  • Sevo’s vision for African progression is ambitious but lacking practical implementation and failing to address the systemic barriers that hinder such development including leaders who stay in power for too long. For Africa to truly progress along this spectrum, there needs to be a strong signal to the market place that lowers the costs of borrowing. This former Marxist isn’t privy to these workings of the market and accuses the West (i.e., The World Bank) for not having Africa’s interest at heart