Resource

Christianity and Islam dominate the world in numbers, geography, and cultural influence largely because of their universalizing nature. Unlike many other religions, they transcend ethnic, linguistic, and geographic boundaries. This universalism is not accidental—it reflects a deep structural evolution from earlier religious systems, one that can be understood through the lens of compression in a neural network. By tracing the development of religious ideas as a sequence of compressed layers in such a network, we can reveal the profound advantages these faiths provide for human cognition, society, and commerce.

Fig. 35 Akia Kurasawa: Why Can’t People Be Happy Together? This was a fork in the road for human civilization. Our dear planet earth now becomes just but an optional resource on which we jostle for resources. By expanding to Mars, the jostle reduces for perhaps a couple of centuries of millenia. There need to be things that inspire you. Things that make you glad to wake up in the morning and say “I’m looking forward to the future.” And until then, we have gym and coffee – or perhaps gin & juice. We are going to have a golden age. One of the American values that I love is optimism. We are going to make the future good.

Polytheism as the Input Layer

The first layer of this metaphorical neural network is polytheism, characterized by its expansive and decentralized structure. Polytheistic religions often mapped human emotions, desires, and fears onto a multiplicity of gods, each representing a specific domain—harvest, war, fertility, the sea. This diversity allowed early humans to relate directly to aspects of their lives, creating highly localized and culturally specific frameworks of worship. However, the trade-off for this granularity was fragmentation. Polytheism struggled to scale; gods remained tied to ethnic or regional identities, making broader societal integration or cross-cultural trade difficult.

Monotheism: The Yellow Node of Compression

The compression of polytheism into monotheism is one of the most radical shifts in human thought, akin to reducing a neural network’s complexity by collapsing many nodes into one dominant node. This single node, God, becomes the repository for all human projections—emotional, psychological, and existential. Monotheism simplifies the divine hierarchy and unifies disparate communities under one ultimate authority, offering a universal framework for meaning.

Christianity and Islam emerge as particularly powerful examples of this compression. In Christianity, Jesus famously invites followers to “cast your burdens onto me.” This is the ultimate act of compression, absorbing all human fears, sins, and uncertainties into a singular divine relationship. Similarly, Islam’s emphasis on tawhid (the oneness of God) reinforces this unifying principle, providing clarity and focus in the spiritual realm.

This compression not only simplifies the divine but also offers psychological relief. No longer does one have to appease multiple gods or navigate competing rituals. Instead, monotheism provides a singular, all-encompassing answer to life’s uncertainties, making it profoundly attractive, especially in times of social or economic upheaval.

The Moral Binary: A Second Layer of Simplification

With the advent of monotheism comes the emergence of a moral binary: good versus evil. This clarity further consolidates the framework, providing a powerful basis for laws, ethics, and social cohesion. Both Christianity and Islam excel in establishing clear moral guidelines that appeal to human needs for justice and fairness. The Ten Commandments or the Sharia serve not just as religious edicts but as foundational structures for societal order.

However, this binary begins to reveal its limits as societies grow more complex. People interact not only within their immediate communities but across diverse cultures and economies. At this point, the need for nuance arises, and the third layer of the neural network begins to form.

Generative Layer: Transactions and Conditional Trust

In the generative layer, the rigid moral binaries of the previous stage begin to soften, allowing for interactions based on mutual benefit rather than absolute trust or enmity. Commerce, trade, and diplomacy flourish under this framework. Here, the contributions of Christianity and Islam to global trade become evident. Both religions provided the ethical and legal structures necessary to facilitate commerce across vast distances. Islamic finance, with its prohibition of usury, and Christian missionary networks, which often accompanied European traders, are examples of how these religions supported economic activity.

Rubio, the first of Trump’s Cabinet nominees to win Senate confirmation and take office, said in a mission statement that all U.S. spending and efforts on foreign affairs “must be justified with the answer to three simple questions: Does it make America safer (cooperative)? Does it make America stronger (adversarial)? Does it make America more prosperous (transactional)?”
– VoA

By moving from token-based, localized interactions to broader systems of conditional trust, these religions created frameworks for transactional relationships that transcended ethnic and cultural boundaries. A Muslim trader in West Africa could confidently engage with a fellow Muslim in the Arabian Peninsula, knowing they shared the same moral and legal principles. Similarly, Christian communities across Europe and beyond found cohesion in shared values and institutions.

The Fifth Layer: The Emotional Spectrum and Emergent Freedom

In the final layer of the network, human emotions and societal structures interact in their most sophisticated forms. Here, religions like Christianity and Islam demonstrate their ability to encompass the full spectrum of human experience. From the stability offered by ritual and tradition to the volatility of religious fervor, these faiths provide pathways for both individual and collective expression.

The central node in this layer—freedom—is represented by the concept of “dancing in chains.” This metaphor captures the paradoxical liberation found within religious discipline. By adhering to the tenets of Christianity or Islam, individuals often report feeling a profound sense of freedom, as if their spiritual constraints provide the structure necessary for creative and emotional fulfillment.

The Provincial Nature of Other Religions

In contrast, religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism often remain tied to specific cultural or geographic contexts. While Buddhism has spread widely, its diffusion often involves significant localization, adapting to the cultures of China, Japan, and Southeast Asia in ways that fragment its universal appeal. Hinduism remains deeply rooted in Indian identity, with its pantheon and rituals closely tied to the subcontinent’s history and social structures. Confucianism, while influential, operates more as a philosophy of governance and ethics than a universal religion, limiting its spiritual resonance across diverse populations.

The Role of Compression in Dominance

The dominance of Christianity and Islam can ultimately be attributed to their ability to compress complex systems of thought into universal frameworks. This compression makes them adaptable and scalable, capable of resonating with diverse populations while providing robust structures for societal organization. By uniting emotional, ethical, and economic dimensions, these religions create a comprehensive system that supports both individual fulfillment and collective progress.

Their universality is not just a product of theology but a reflection of their ability to integrate layers of human experience into a cohesive whole. From the localized gods of polytheism to the expansive frameworks of commerce and civilization, Christianity and Islam represent a culmination of religious evolution—a neural network refined over centuries to meet the needs of an interconnected world.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network fractal
def define_layers():
    return {
        'World': ['Cosmos-Entropy', 'Planet-Tempered', 'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Generative-Means', 'Cartel-Ends', ], # Polytheism, Olympus, Kingdom
        'Perception': ['Perception-Ledger'], # God, Judgement Day, Key
        'Agency': ['Open-Nomiddleman', 'Closed-Trusted'], # Evil & Good
        'Generative': ['Ratio-Weaponized', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Odds-Monopolized'], # Dynamics, Compromises
        'Physical': ['Volatile-Revolutionary', 'Unveiled-Resentment',  'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Stable-Conservative'] # Values
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Perception-Ledger'],
        'paleturquoise': ['Cartel-Ends', 'Closed-Trusted', 'Odds-Monopolized', 'Stable-Conservative'],
        'lightgreen': ['Generative-Means', 'Competition-Tokenized', 'Exuberant-Jubilee', 'Freedom-Dance in Chains', 'Unveiled-Resentment'],
        'lightsalmon': [
            'Life-Needs', 'Ecosystem-Costs', 'Open-Nomiddleman', # Ecosystem = Red Queen = Prometheus = Sacrifice
            'Ratio-Weaponized', 'Volatile-Revolutionary'
        ],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))  # Default color fallback

    # Add edges (automated for consecutive layers)
    layer_names = list(layers.keys())
    for i in range(len(layer_names) - 1):
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_names[i], layer_names[i + 1]
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    plt.title("Inversion as Transformation: Autobiographies Redeem all the Chaos", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 36 Hope. By Pope Francis with Carlo Musso. Translated by Richard Dixon. Random House; 320 pages; $32. Viking; £25 His Holiness Pope Francis—the 266th bishop of Rome, supreme pontiff of the Universal Church, sovereign of the Vatican City State—is a man with fancy titles, a simple soul and simpler prose. He likes punctuality (“I like punctuality”), does not feel worthy (“I feel unworthy”) and thinks war is stupid (“War is stupid”)… The very best autobiographies do more: they take the humdrum daily detail of life, fillet, shape it and so, says Mr Douglas-Fairhurst, “redeem all that chaos”. The pope’s biography does not do this. It gives the reader a mass of detail: trousers, pizza, his parents’ first address. But it does nothing with this. As a result, this biography of a pope offers, ironically, no redemption—and precious little sense of the man himself. The devil, as always, is in the details. The pope, alas, is not.