{
"cells": [
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"(resilience)=\n",
"# Resilience đĄď¸â¤ď¸đ°\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"+ Expand
\n",
" \n",
" \n",
" \n",
"
\n",
"\n",
"
\n",
" \n",
"
\n",
"\n",
"
\n",
" \n",
" \n",
"
\n",
" \n",
"
\n",
" \n",
"
\n",
" \n",
"
\n",
" \n",
"
\n",
"
Personalized Medicine, National Identity, and Trump. With Trevor Noah and Company. Meanwhile, de Profundis! Oscar Wildeâs The Rise of Historical Criticism (1879) traces the evolution of historical thought among the ancients, from skepticism to rationalism, a process that aligns with a neural networkâs layered architecture. Viewed through this lens, the essay mirrors how such a system processes inputs, refines data, and generates outputs, akin to the Tragedy, History, Epic, Drama, and Comedy layers. In the \"Tragedy\" layer, Wilde identifies the Greek Aufklärung as an initial pattern recognition of order amid mythic chaos, akin to a networkâs input nodes processing raw data like cosmology and biology. The \"History\" layer emerges as skepticism filters out superstition, with Herodotus distinguishing fact from fable, much like non-self surveillance in a network. The \"Epic\" layer synthesizes this into a negotiated identity, as Euhemeros rationalizes myths and Thucydides grounds history in human motives, paralleling a networkâs hidden-layer modeling. The \"Drama\" layer reflects the tension between belief and reason, with Plato and Aristotle refining historical critique through ethical and inductive lenses, akin to a network balancing inputs. Finally, the \"Comedy\" layer resolves these tensions in Polybiusâs scientific rationalism, integrating data into a predictive model of history as a networkâs output layer. Wildeâs essay thus becomes a neural-like progression: from recognizing patterns to resolving them into a cohesive, rational framework, proving the timeless modernity of Greek historical criticism.
\n", "