Tactical

The meteoric rise of ChatGPT is a tale of modern ingenuity, one that blends technological brilliance with a primal understanding of human language. Without the aid of advertising, celebrity endorsements, or even prior brand recognition, OpenAI managed to deliver a product that became an overnight sensation. Its appeal lay not in its technical complexity—though that would later astonish experts—but in its mastery of idiomatic language. It was as if a machine, for the first time, could speak like us. And not just with precision but with nuance, rhythm, and even charm. It felt like magic. Yet, beneath this seamless interface lay a story of immense sacrifice, one that calls into question our assumptions about progress, cost, and humanity.

Idiomatic Mastery: The Ultimate Compression

Language, especially idiomatic language, defies compression in ways that are deeply intuitive. Unlike rigid formulas or defined systems, idioms carry layers of meaning that are cultural, historical, and personal. They evoke imagery, suggest emotion, and often resist direct translation. Consider the lines from La Vita è Bella: “Questa è la mia storia. Questo è il sacrificio. Che mio padre fece. Questo era il suo dono per me.” Stripped of their linguistic and cultural texture, the English equivalent—“This is my story. This is the sacrifice. That my father made. This was his gift to me.”—is functional but lacks the same poetic cadence. It is in the rhythm, the gendered articles, and the pauses that Italian idioms breathe life into the words. ChatGPT, however, seems to navigate these intricacies effortlessly, wielding language with an idiomatic dexterity that astonishes.

But how does a machine achieve what we intuitively understand to be uncompressible? The answer lies in the backend: a monumental architecture of parameters and weights, trained over months on a dataset vast enough to rival the collective linguistic history of humanity. Compression here does not mean simplification but transformation. Neural networks like ChatGPT’s hidden layers act as a kind of alchemical crucible, distilling raw data into compressed representations that encode patterns, relationships, and probabilities. This compression allows for parallel processing, enabling the model to grasp idiomatic structures and generate responses with uncanny fluency—all within milliseconds (not the sum of time-clocks punched).

The Cost of Compression: Energy and Sacrifice

Yet, every act of compression demands a cost. For ChatGPT, the cost was not blood but energy—and a staggering amount of it. The training process consumed vast computational resources, powered by energy-intensive data centers that leave an indelible footprint on the planet. The sacrifice, in this case, was borne by the ecosystem, as well as by the global economy that supports these technologies. The billions of dollars invested in training models like ChatGPT reflect not just financial ambition but a willingness to dedicate immense resources to a single vision of progress.

Then there is the human element. Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), a key component in refining ChatGPT, relies on human trainers to evaluate and guide the model’s responses. These trainers, often outsourced to countries with lower labor costs, perform a repetitive and cognitively demanding task for minimal pay. Their labor is a silent sacrifice, rarely acknowledged in the glossy narratives of AI innovation. Complaints from these workers remind us that progress is never free; it is merely displaced.

Plasticity, Reweighting, and the Neural Network of Life

If language learning in humans defies compression, it is because it relies on plasticity—our brain’s ability to adapt and reweight connections in response to experience. This is analogous to the hidden layers of a neural network, which compress time by parallelizing learning. While a child takes years to absorb the nuances of idiomatic speech, ChatGPT achieves this in months. Yet, the child’s journey is fueled by curiosity, play, and social interaction, whereas the model’s journey is driven by energy and algorithms. The sacrifice here is time for the human, energy for the machine.

And yet, is this trade-off truly equivalent? When we consider the broader implications, the compression of time in machine learning seems to come at a disproportionate cost. The Earth bears the burden of powering these feats, and the human workers at the fringes of this ecosystem bear the emotional and physical toll of training them. Unlike the father’s sacrifice in La Vita è Bella, which was personal and redemptive, the sacrifices made for AI are diffuse, systemic, and often invisible.

The Devil’s Bargain: OpenAI and the Future

OpenAI’s journey—selling 49% of its “soul” to investors—illustrates the tension between idealism and pragmatism. To scale ChatGPT to its current heights, the company had to align with commercial interests, securing billions to fuel its ambitions. This was the sacrifice required to bring a vision of artificial intelligence into global consciousness. But at what cost? The allure of idiomatic mastery and instant answers obscures the hidden labor, the environmental toll, and the ethical dilemmas of creating and deploying such systems.

Conclusion: Compression, Sacrifice, and Humanity

ChatGPT’s success is a testament to what humanity can achieve when it combines creativity with technology. Its ability to compress the uncompressible—idiomatic language—is both a marvel and a warning. The sacrifices made along the way, from energy consumption to human labor, mirror the sacrifices inherent in any great leap forward. As we marvel at this achievement, we must also ask ourselves: What stories, like those in La Vita è Bella, will we tell about this moment in history? Will they speak of progress balanced with wisdom, or of a Faustian bargain where we gained fluency but lost something far greater?

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network structure
def define_layers():
    return {
        # Divine and narrative framework in the film
        'World': [
            'Il Sole é L’altre Stelle',  # Guido’s grand, universal sense of play and creativity (Cosmos)
            'La Terra',  # The tangible and oppressive reality of the Holocaust (Earth)
            'Vita é Bella',  # The stakes of survival and human connection (Life)
            'Il Sacrificio',  # Guido’s ultimate sacrifice
            'Mia Storia',  # Giosuè’s personal narrative, shaped by his father
            'Dono Per Me'  # The "gift" of innocence and joy given by Guido
        ],
        # Perception and filtering of reality
        'Perception': ['Che Mio'],  # How Giosuè interprets his father’s actions and words
        # Agency and Guido’s defining traits
        'Agency': [
            'Allegria',  # Guido’s cheerfulness
            'Ottimismo'  # Guido’s optimism as a tool for shaping the narrative
        ],
        # Generativity and legacy
        'Generativity': [
            'Anarchia',  # Guido’s rebellion against oppressive reality
            'Oligarchia',  # The systemic constraints he navigates
            'Padre Fece'  # The actions and sacrifices Guido made for his son
        ],
        # Physical realities and their interplay
        'Physicality': [
            'Dynamic',  # Guido’s improvisational actions, like creating the “game”
            'Partisan',  # The direct oppression he faces
            'Common Wealth',  # Shared humanity and joy despite hardship
            'Non-Partisan',  # Universal themes transcending sides
            'Static'  # The immovable, tragic finality of the Holocaust
        ]
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors(node, layer):
    if node == 'Che Mio':
        return 'yellow'  # Perception as the interpretive bridge
    if layer == 'World' and node == 'Dono Per Me':
        return 'paleturquoise'  # Optimism and the "gift"
    if layer == 'World' and node == 'Mia Storia':
        return 'lightgreen'  # Harmony and legacy
    if layer == 'World' and node in ['Il Sole é L’altre Stelle', 'La Terra']:
        return 'lightgray'  # Context of divine and tangible
    elif layer == 'Agency' and node == 'Ottimismo':
        return 'paleturquoise'  # Guido’s defining hope
    elif layer == 'Generativity':
        if node == 'Padre Fece':
            return 'paleturquoise'  # Guido’s ultimate acts of selflessness
        elif node == 'Oligarchia':
            return 'lightgreen'  # Navigating systemic structures
        elif node == 'Anarchia':
            return 'lightsalmon'  # Rebellion and creativity
    elif layer == 'Physicality':
        if node == 'Static':
            return 'paleturquoise'  # The unchanging, tragic realities
        elif node in ['Non-Partisan', 'Common Wealth', 'Partisan']:
            return 'lightgreen'  # Shared humanity and resilience
        elif node == 'Dynamic':
            return 'lightsalmon'  # Guido’s improvisation and vitality
    return 'lightsalmon'  # Default color for tension or conflict

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, center_x, offset):
    layer_size = len(layer)
    start_y = -(layer_size - 1) / 2  # Center the layer vertically
    return [(center_x + offset, start_y + i) for i in range(layer_size)]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    center_x = 0  # Align nodes horizontally

    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        y_positions = calculate_positions(nodes, center_x, offset=-len(layers) + i + 1)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, y_positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(assign_colors(node, layer_name))

    # Add edges (without weights)
    for layer_pair in [
        ('World', 'Perception'),  # Giosuè interprets the "World" through "Che Mio"
        ('Perception', 'Agency'),  # Guido’s cheerfulness shapes Giosuè’s perception
        ('Agency', 'Generativity'),  # Guido’s optimism drives his generative actions
        ('Generativity', 'Physicality')  # His legacy plays out in the physical world
    ]:
        source_layer, target_layer = layer_pair
        for source in layers[source_layer]:
            for target in layers[target_layer]:
                G.add_edge(source, target)

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(14, 10))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=10, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.1"
    )
    plt.title("Senza regole, si rischia di cadere nell'anarchia", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 1 Can We Agree On The Objective Function to Optimize? The Physical (Output) Layer of this neural network shows somewhat mutually exclusive nodes for optimization. We’ve elevated the principal-agent theory to handle at least five categories rather than a simplistic binary. This allows us to digest capitalism, marxism, feminism, racism, colonialism, tribalism, terrorism, religion, atheism, mental illness, music, art, philosophy, science, movements, mythology, and algorithms