Entropy, 🏇🌊🐘🐆🦒 🦔

+ Expand

Analysis

In designing the scenery and costumes for any of Shakespeare’s plays, the first thing the artist has to settle is the best date for the drama. This should be determined by the general spirit of the play, more than by any actual historical references which may occur in it. Most Hamlets I have seen were placed far too early. Hamlet is essentially a scholar of the Revival of Learning; and if the allusion to the recent invasion of England by the Danes puts it back to the ninth century, the use of foils brings it down much later. Once, however, that the date has been fixed, then the archæologist is to supply us with the facts which the artist is to convert into effects.

-- The Truth of Masks 🎭

An upside-down tree begins in the earth, roots buried deep, an intricate system of life drawing from entropy itself—the raw, unfiltered chaos of existence. But in this case, these roots are not merely roots. They are the foundations of a neural network, one that captures the totality of reality through six essential nodes: cosmology, geology, biology, ecology, symbiotology, and teleology. Together, these roots form what I call CG-BEST, a fractal-like web of knowledge spanning from the grand scale of the cosmos to the smallest instances of symbiotic relationships, all leading to the ultimate question of purpose. This is the first layer—entropy itself, the unfiltered system of nature, the vast potential energy waiting to be channeled into structured meaning.

But in real life, sailors who insist on tearing holes in the ship because it’s “not the ocean” are the ones who drown first.
— Yours Truly & GPT-4o

The Upside-Down Tree: A Fractal of Reality, Resources, and Illusion. In the darkest, most sacred hours of Friday night, exploring the deep secrets of Kabbalah, he discovered a most astonishing mystical teaching: The Tree of Life is an upside-down tree.

🔍

From these roots, the second layer emerges: the trunk, a channel of resources. A tree’s trunk is a passageway, carrying nutrients from the soil, the deep past, the chaotic origins, into something more structured and purposeful. In this neural network of reality, the trunk represents resources—the structured, directed utilization of entropy into something useful. Resources are never neutral; they are the battleground between raw potential and human intervention. The trunk, while appearing solid, is already layered with invisible decisions about how energy will be directed, who will benefit, and who will be starved. It is the moment in which natural potential begins to be filtered, where the universe’s bounty begins to face human intent.

But all trees must split. The third layer is the first fork, the decision point, the divergence of pathways. Here, we must confront two opposing systems: the Faustian bargain versus something akin to Islamic finance. The Faustian bargain is capitalism in its most unfiltered form—wealth accumulation at all costs, success measured in asymmetry, growth defined by excess. In contrast, Islamic finance follows a different logic, one that resists usury, promotes distribution, and avoids the grotesque disproportion between branches that capitalism inevitably breeds. The choice at this fork determines the very structure of what comes next. If the path of the Faustian bargain is taken, the tree mutates into an unnatural form—branches that do not resemble one another, grotesquely swollen limbs that drain the rest of the system. A billionaire’s limb swells beyond comprehension, while others wither. But if the path of balance, of equitable finance, is taken, then the tree remains fractal—self-similar, structured, a natural system of organic distribution.

Forbids Usury
Speculation
Accumulation
Compounding^N
Exponentials
— Salience

Beyond the fork, the fourth layer, the fractal branches, spread. This is distribution, the way in which resources and wealth move through the system. A healthy tree distributes nutrients evenly; each branch is an echo of the other, a testament to the structure of nature’s balance. In the Faustian system, distribution breaks. The billionaires’ branches consume without proportion, while others remain skeletal. In an Islamic finance-like system, the tree remains recognizable. Its branches follow the logic of nature, self-sustaining, an organism in which no part is starved to death by another. The fractal form continues, reinforcing itself, allowing energy to reach the farthest leaves.

At the final layer, the fifth, we reach the illusion—the leaves, the outward appearance of the system. Leaves are delicate, they are the face of the tree, the most ephemeral, the first to die when the system beneath is unstable. If distribution has been grotesquely skewed, the illusion becomes impossible to sustain. A tree cannot bear leaves on only one branch while the rest remain barren. The system collapses into entropy again. The illusion of control, of sustainability, of infinite growth, shatters. If the distribution has followed a fractal logic, the leaves thrive. The system sustains itself, reality remains whole, and illusion does not become catastrophic delusion.

CG-BEST: Nitrogen Fixation and the Hidden Economy of Life. And how does that relate to a bequest, resources, faustian bargain vs islamic finance, distributed, and legacy?

Thus, the upside-down tree is a reflection of choice—between balance and grotesque disproportion, between fractal order and the violent asymmetry of unchecked accumulation. It is a question of whether we build a system that resembles nature, or one that mocks it, a monstrosity destined to collapse under its own illusion.

Nitrogen is the invisible currency of life, cycling through ecosystems in a silent but relentless exchange that sustains all living things. It is a paradoxical element—both abundant and scarce, omnipresent yet inaccessible in its most common form. The air we breathe is nearly 80% nitrogen, yet most organisms, including plants, cannot use it directly. Instead, they depend on a vast underground network of microbial alchemists that transform inert nitrogen gas (N₂) into forms that life can absorb and use. This process, known as nitrogen fixation, is one of nature’s most intricate and essential biochemical feats. Within the framework of CG-BEST—Cosmology, Geology, Biology, Ecology, Symbiotology, and Teleology—nitrogen fixation is not just a biochemical reaction; it is a fundamental force that connects cosmic origins to ecological balance and evolutionary destiny.

Consider pretext, subtext, text, context, metatext. It is text in the mode of holy-writ that makes faustian bargains vs. islamic finance the ultimate bifurcation in how systems are engineered.

At the foundation of this process lies symbiotology, the study of interdependent relationships. Certain bacteria, particularly Rhizobium species, have evolved a mutualistic relationship with leguminous plants, forming nodules in their roots where nitrogen fixation occurs. These bacteria take atmospheric nitrogen and, through enzymatic reactions, convert it into ammonia (NH₃), which is further processed into ammonium (NH₄⁺), a form plants can absorb and use to build amino acids, proteins, and nucleotides. This symbiosis is an ancient contract between species, a microcosm of cooperative survival where the plant provides carbohydrates in exchange for nitrogen—a direct challenge to the Faustian logic of ruthless competition that dominates many human economic structures.

But symbiotic bacteria are not the sole agents of nitrogen fixation. Free-living bacteria, such as Azotobacter and Clostridium, independently fix nitrogen without forming direct partnerships with plants. These organisms operate on the margins, functioning as microbial freelancers, contributing to soil fertility without requiring a host. Their role in the nitrogen cycle reflects an alternative ecological strategy—one of decentralization and spontaneous contribution, mirroring systems where cooperative exchange occurs without rigid hierarchy. Such bacterial independence suggests that not all efficiency must come from direct mutualism; sometimes, life flourishes through dispersed, unsupervised processes that still sustain the whole.

---

Heretic: Déluge
Control: Filtration
Religion: Illusion
— Beck & Woods

Beyond the microbial realm, the cosmos itself plays a role in nitrogen fixation through an unlikely agent: lightning. Each flash of lightning serves as an atmospheric crucible, breaking the triple bond of nitrogen molecules with immense energy, allowing them to combine with oxygen to form nitrogen oxides. These compounds dissolve in rainwater, falling to the earth as nitrates that plants can absorb. Here, nitrogen fixation transcends biology and enters the domain of cosmology and geology—a process that began in the primordial storms of Earth’s early atmosphere, where lightning played a role in forming the first organic molecules. In this way, nitrogen fixation is a phenomenon that stretches from the origins of life to its present sustenance, an unbroken link between the violence of cosmic forces and the gentleness of a leaf absorbing nutrients from the soil.

Within ecology, nitrogen fixation is the silent architect of fertility. It is the reason why forests regenerate after a fire, why prairies remain lush, and why agricultural systems that incorporate legumes require less synthetic fertilizer. When ecosystems are intact, the nitrogen cycle operates in balance, feeding itself through decomposition, microbial activity, and atmospheric inputs. But human intervention has fractured this cycle. The artificial fixation of nitrogen through the Haber-Bosch process, the industrial technique that produces synthetic fertilizers, has reshaped global ecology. It has led to unprecedented agricultural yields but at the cost of nitrogen runoff, algal blooms, and soil degradation. The modern nitrogen crisis is an unintended consequence of disrupting a process that evolved over billions of years—a reminder that when we override nature’s finely tuned systems, we often create distortions that lead to imbalance.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Tragedy (Pattern Recognition)': ['Cosmology', 'Geology', 'Biology', 'Ecology', "Symbiotology", 'Teleology'],
        'History (Resources)': ['Resources'],  
        'Epic (Negotiated Identity)': ['Faustian Bargain', 'Islamic Finance'],  
        'Drama (Self vs. Non-Self)': ['Darabah', 'Sharakah', 'Takaful'],  
        "Comedy (Resolution)": ['Cacophony', 'Outside', 'Ukhuwah', 'Inside', 'Symphony']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Resources'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Teleology', 'Islamic Finance', 'Takaful', 'Symphony'],  
        'lightgreen': ["Symbiotology", 'Sharakah', 'Outside', 'Inside', 'Ukhuwah'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['Biology', 'Ecology', 'Faustian Bargain', 'Darabah', 'Cacophony'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edges
def define_edges():
    return [
        ('Cosmology', 'Resources'),
        ('Geology', 'Resources'),
        ('Biology', 'Resources'),
        ('Ecology', 'Resources'),
        ("Symbiotology", 'Resources'),
        ('Teleology', 'Resources'),
        ('Resources', 'Faustian Bargain'),
        ('Resources', 'Islamic Finance'),
        ('Faustian Bargain', 'Darabah'),
        ('Faustian Bargain', 'Sharakah'),
        ('Faustian Bargain', 'Takaful'),
        ('Islamic Finance', 'Darabah'),
        ('Islamic Finance', 'Sharakah'),
        ('Islamic Finance', 'Takaful'),
        ('Darabah', 'Cacophony'),
        ('Darabah', 'Outside'),
        ('Darabah', 'Ukhuwah'),
        ('Darabah', 'Inside'),
        ('Darabah', 'Symphony'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Cacophony'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Outside'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Ukhuwah'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Inside'),
        ('Sharakah', 'Symphony'),
        ('Takaful', 'Cacophony'),
        ('Takaful', 'Outside'),
        ('Takaful', 'Ukhuwah'),
        ('Takaful', 'Inside'),
        ('Takaful', 'Symphony')
    ]

# Define black edges (1 → 7 → 9 → 11 → [13-17])
black_edges = [
    (4, 7), (7, 9), (9, 11), (11, 13), (11, 14), (11, 15), (11, 16), (11, 17)
]

# Calculate node positions
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph with correctly assigned black edges
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()

    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []

    # Create mapping from original node names to numbered labels
    mapping = {}
    counter = 1
    for layer in layers.values():
        for node in layer:
            mapping[node] = f"{counter}. {node}"
            counter += 1

    # Add nodes with new numbered labels and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            new_node = mapping[node]
            G.add_node(new_node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[new_node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))

    # Add edges with updated node labels
    edge_colors = {}
    for source, target in edges:
        if source in mapping and target in mapping:
            new_source = mapping[source]
            new_target = mapping[target]
            G.add_edge(new_source, new_target)
            edge_colors[(new_source, new_target)] = 'lightgrey'

    # Define and add black edges manually with correct node names
    numbered_nodes = list(mapping.values())
    black_edge_list = [
        (numbered_nodes[3], numbered_nodes[6]),  # 4 -> 7
        (numbered_nodes[6], numbered_nodes[8]),  # 7 -> 9
        (numbered_nodes[8], numbered_nodes[10]), # 9 -> 11
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[12]), # 11 -> 13
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[13]), # 11 -> 14
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[14]), # 11 -> 15
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[15]), # 11 -> 16
        (numbered_nodes[10], numbered_nodes[16])  # 11 -> 17
    ]

    for src, tgt in black_edge_list:
        G.add_edge(src, tgt)
        edge_colors[(src, tgt)] = 'black'

    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, 
        edge_color=[edge_colors.get(edge, 'lightgrey') for edge in G.edges],
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    
    plt.title("CG-BEST", fontsize=18)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 1 History. It’s a fractal unfolding of entropy and order, a ceaseless churn wherein civilization rise, on the back of extracted resources, but collapse under the weight of their own complexity, as the illusion of linear progress–the arrow of time merely inscribing the same motifs at different scales–invites us to witness the second law of thermodynamics in slow motion. We get to see empires, cities, cultures structured around an energetic peak before unraveling into diffusion. But lets not mistake entropy for chaos: its the necessary precondition for renewal!

Finally, nitrogen fixation raises teleological questions about the grand design of biological systems. Is it mere chance that bacteria and plants evolved this relationship, or does it suggest an inherent tendency toward cooperative survival? The structure of the nitrogen cycle, with its distributed agency and multiple overlapping pathways, mirrors the fractal logic of the upside-down tree, where balance and proportionality sustain the system. If one branch—whether a species, an economy, or a nitrogen pathway—grows grotesquely at the expense of the others, collapse is inevitable. The interwoven nature of nitrogen fixation suggests that life is not a zero-sum game; it thrives on shared resources, mutual exchange, and the unseen work of countless microscopic agents ensuring continuity.

Nitrogen fixation is a testament to the unseen forces that sustain life, a process operating at the crossroads of microbiology, atmospheric physics, and cosmic history. It is a quiet but profound example of how interconnected the universe is, a perfect illustration of CG-BEST in action. From the depths of the soil to the high-voltage flash of lightning, nitrogen moves through these layers, shaping life in ways both humble and grand. Whether through symbiotic cooperation, independent microbial work, or cosmic energy, the transformation of nitrogen is a delicate taste of nature’s own balance—a process that, if disrupted, reminds us of the fragile but persistent logic that sustains all living systems.

Which brings us to the declaration: the one true religion is control! Control, or the struggle for it, shapes civilizations, belief systems, and even personal philosophies. Religions, governments, and ideologies all function as frameworks to impose order, whether through divine authority, social contracts, or raw power.

Is control the religion, or is it merely the tool? Control itself is sterile unless there’s something to direct it. What’s being controlled, and why? Is it the illusion of control that makes people submit, or the genuine enforcement of it?

So if control is the “one true religion,” then resistance, chaos, and entropy are its heresies. That would align well with our CG-BEST model—where unchecked entropy at the roots either fuels a structured system or collapses it into grotesque asymmetry.

Perhaps all belief systems are ultimately just about who controls whom, and nothing more. But there’s room for something beyond control—like symbiosis, self-organization, or emergent complexity. Simulation of all this complexity is also a possibility.