Chapter 2

Abstract

Here’s the revised table with Meta Platforms being categorized under “Pastoral-comical-historical” to reflect its broad impact across different realms:

Rank	Company	Market Cap (USD)	Data Recency	Realm
1	Apple	$3.469 T	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical
2	Microsoft	$3.235 T	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical
3	NVIDIA	$2.845 T	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical
4	Alphabet (Google)	$2.019 T	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical
5	Amazon	$2.010 T	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical
6	Tesla	$799 B	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical
7	Meta Platforms	$1.420 T	As of June 16, 2024	Pastoral-comical-historical
8	Berkshire Hathaway	$887.16 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Historical
9	Eli Lilly	$808.65 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Tragical
10	Broadcom	$792.87 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Pastoral-comical
11	Saudi Aramco	$1.766 T	As of June 16, 2024	Historical
12	JPMorgan Chase	$550 B	As of mid-2024	Historical
13	Visa	$550.38 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Pastoral-comical
14	Walmart	$542.78 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Pastoral-comical
15	Oracle	$397.89 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Pastoral-comical
16	Procter & Gamble	$386.66 B	As of Jan 1, 2024	Pastoral-comical
17	Johnson & Johnson	Not specified	Market Cap not listed	Tragical
18	UnitedHealth Group	Not specified	Market Cap not listed	Tragical
19	ExxonMobil	Not specified	Market Cap not listed	Historical
20	Home Depot	Not specified	Market Cap not listed	Pastoral-comical

Notes:

• Historical: Companies like Berkshire Hathaway, Saudi Aramco, JPMorgan Chase, and ExxonMobil continue to represent traditional sectors with deep historical roots in economic structures.

• Pastoral-comical: This group still includes companies that engage consumers through technology, personalization, emotion, and user experience, aiming for broad appeal.

• Pastoral-comical-historical: Meta Platforms is now classified here due to its significant historical impact in the realm of social media, its pastoral-comical appeal through personalized content, community features, and emotional engagement, and its historical role in how societies connect and share information.

• Tragical: Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and UnitedHealth Group remain in this category, focusing on health, biology, and existential human conditions.

This adjustment reflects Meta’s unique position straddling both the historical development of the internet and social media, alongside its psychological and emotional impact on users.

• Strategy

  • Random Inspiration

  • Hallowed Ciphers

• Payoff

  • Accessible to Plebeians

  • Only for Aristocrats, Steeped in Literature

• Nash

  • Feel-good in the moment

  • General landscape of human condition: as out-of-body spectator, have luxury to be idle & contemplative

---

Your analysis of Woody Allen’s Match Point through the lens of transforming personal experiences into artistic expression via specific philosophical and literary influences is quite insightful. Here’s how you might structure this process using your framework:

Step 1: Experiences

• Animals: Represents primal instincts, desires, and raw aspects of human nature. In Match Point, this is reflected in the characters’ desires for wealth, status, and sexual fulfillment.

• Man: Encompasses human interactions, societal norms, and moral dilemmas. The relationships, betrayals, and social climbing in the film highlight this.

• God/Gods: Existential questions and the moral universe’s structure. In Match Point, the absence of divine intervention suggests a godless or indifferent world.

Step 2: Transformation into Arcs

• Emotional Arcs: Characters experience a range of emotions from ambition to guilt, reflecting complex emotional journeys.

• Tragic Eternal Recurrences: The narrative echoes classical tragedy, where attempts at control lead to inevitable downfall.

• Narrative Arcs: The plot twists and moral ambiguities craft a narrative questioning morality and fate, aligning with the hero’s journey but with a darker twist.

Step 3: The Bridge - Ciphers

• Dostoevsky: Crime and Punishment framework explores guilt, morality, and psychological torment, reflected in Chris’s internal conflict.

• Nietzsche: Ideas of will to power, death of God, and moral freedom seen in characters’ pursuit of desires without moral constraints.

• Karl Marx: While not directly referenced, Marx’s influence can be seen in the critique of class structures driving the characters’ actions.

Click to expand

Application to Match Point

• Antihero: Chris Wilton embodies the antihero through ambition and manipulation, similar to Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment.

• Tragic Hero: Chris’s psychological torment and downfall follow a modern tragic arc.

• Classic Hero: Nola Rice attempts a heroic narrative of seeking truth and love, though her arc ends tragically.

Conclusion

Match Point stands out due to its existential tone, influenced by Dostoevsky’s themes of crime, guilt, and existential dread. Allen explores moral ambiguity and psychological depth, using literature and philosophy as bridges to examine human nature.

Reflections

Strategy

• Random Inspiration: Woody Allen’s shift to darker narratives may seem random, but it’s a deliberate exploration of literature like Dostoevsky.

• Hallowed Ciphers: References to Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, and Marx act as ciphers, tools to decode human nature in the film.

Payoff

• Accessible to Plebeians: The film’s themes are universally relatable despite its darker tone.

• Only for Aristocrats: The philosophical depth appeals more to those familiar with literature, enriching the experience for them.

Nash

• Feel-good in the moment: While not traditionally feel-good, the film’s narrative suspense offers temporary satisfaction.

• General landscape of human condition: The film allows contemplation of fate, morality, and desire, engaging the audience in deeper reflections.

---

Bill Gates’ selective nature as a teenager is both fascinating and telling. It speaks to his sharp focus and vision early on. Gates’ ability to dismiss ideas that didn’t align with his long-term goals suggests a deep, almost instinctual understanding of where technology was heading, even at a young age. That one idea he picked, which became the personal computer, wasn’t just about innovation for the sake of it—it was a carefully calculated choice. Gates likely saw the PC as the democratization of computing, giving power to individuals rather than just corporations or governments. His selective process was less about being dismissive and more about identifying the idea with the most transformative potential. While it may have been frustrating for Paul Allen at times, that critical filtering is what made Gates the relentless, forward-thinking entrepreneur he became.

Tech is Marxist

It’s a fascinating thread to pull on—the idea that these tech titans essentially democratized access to what were once luxuries of the elite. Jeff Bezos, with Amazon, broke down the barriers to knowledge and consumption. He turned what was once a library in the mansion of a scholar or aristocrat into something every person could access from their couch, expanding from books to everything imaginable. Bezos isn’t just selling goods; he’s selling power, convenience, and access—privileges previously reserved for the few (ART-STEM-DNR).

Similarly, Zuckerberg took the private networks of the Ivy Leagues—once exclusive domains where power and influence were consolidated—and gave it to the world. He understood that connecting people on a massive scale could unlock new realms of influence, and so what was a playground for the elite became the global agora for the masses.

Then there’s Google, spearheaded by Page and Brin. Before search engines, accessing specialized knowledge often required formal education, elite libraries, or the privilege of time and location. Google turned the world into a searchable database—every niche, every fact, accessible in seconds. It’s almost anti-aristocratic in nature; there’s no gatekeeper anymore.

Apple, and particularly Steve Jobs, pulled off something even more intimate by placing this unprecedented power quite literally in the palms of the masses. The iPhone is like the culmination of all these efforts—information, commerce, and social connectivity, all compressed into a single device. The world used to be for the few, and now it’s for anyone who can afford an iPhone or a smartphone.

It’s this mass accessibility, this transfer of power, that underpins their wealth. They’ve flipped the traditional model of privilege on its head—not by hoarding it, but by distributing it en masse, and in doing so, they’ve been rewarded with untold riches.

Marxist Alignment

Here’s a perspective that aligns with Marxist theory regarding technology:

Technology as a Means of Production:

In Marxist terms, technology functions as part of the means of production. Marx argued that the means of production should be collectively owned to prevent the exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie. When technology is accessible and democratically controlled, it can serve the interests of the many rather than the few.

Accessibility and Democratization:

• Alienation Reduction: When technology is concentrated in the hands of the elite, it leads to a form of alienation where the majority are distanced from the tools that could enhance their lives or productivity. By making technology accessible, this alienation is reduced, allowing people to engage more directly with the tools that shape their world.

• Power Dynamics: Technology often embodies power. Exclusive access to advanced technology can reinforce class distinctions, where the elite use technological advantages to maintain economic and social dominance. Democratizing technology can, theoretically, level the playing field, enabling broader participation in economic and social spheres.

• Innovation for the Masses: When technology is accessible, innovation tends to focus on solving problems relevant to the majority rather than luxury or niche markets. This can lead to more practical and widespread applications, like affordable healthcare technologies, educational tools, or sustainable energy solutions.

• Collective Intelligence: Open access to technology encourages collective problem-solving and innovation. The open-source movement, which allows anyone to contribute to and benefit from technology, is a practical example of this principle in action. It shows that when technology is not proprietary, it can evolve more rapidly and meet diverse needs.

• Cultural and Social Advancement: Technology that is widely accessible can also promote cultural expressions, social movements, and education. When everyone has the tools to create, share, and learn, society as a whole advances.

Historical and Modern Examples:

• The Printing Press: Often cited as an early example, the printing press made information more accessible, reducing the monopoly of knowledge held by the clergy and nobility.

• Internet and Open Source Software: These embody the spirit of technology for the masses, where knowledge and tools are available to anyone, theoretically allowing for greater equality in information access and creative production.

• Modern Movements: Initiatives like Wikipedia, open educational resources, or movements towards open-access scientific research reflect a push towards making the benefits of technology a common good rather than a commodity.

In essence, from a Marxist viewpoint, technology is most revolutionary and beneficial when it breaks down barriers, reduces inequality, and serves as a tool for the emancipation and empowerment of the working class and the general populace, rather than being a mechanism for further entrenching the power of an elite. When technology’s development and distribution align with these principles, it can be seen as fulfilling its potential in advancing societal equity and human flourishing.