Probability, ∂Y 🎶 ✨ 👑

Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy argues that music is the deepest, most primordial art form, a direct expression of the Dionysian spirit that transcends mere representation. It does not depict reality in the way painting or sculpture does, nor does it rely on the rigid structures of language and rational thought. Instead, music speaks to something older, something buried beneath cognition, something primal. This insight, which Nietzsche found in Greek tragedy, aligns seamlessly with the function of Brodmann’s Area 22 on the right hemisphere, which governs auditory processing, prosody, and the ineffable dimensions of meaning. If the left hemisphere, with its linguistic structures and semantic processing, is Apollonian—giving order, clarity, and meaning—then the right hemisphere’s BA22 is Dionysian, existing in a space of ambiguity, intuition, and raw emotional experience.

Schizophrenia, particularly in its auditory manifestations, can be seen as an excess of this Dionysian energy—an overactivity in the realm of pure sound and sensation that has broken free from the Apollonian structures that normally contain it. Patients who hear voices do not merely process language differently; they experience meaning outside of the usual constraints of syntax and reference. Their experience mirrors the Nietzschean claim that music, more than any other art, reveals the truth of existence as will, as force, as something beyond rational comprehension. In schizophrenia, this truth becomes overwhelming. The right BA22, in its hyperactive state, generates meaning untethered from rational discourse, producing voices that do not merely say things but demand response, much like the call of the Dionysian chorus in ancient Greek tragedy. The individual no longer commands language; language commands the individual.

Fig. 1 Hearing is not merely a passive sense—it is the gateway to submission, whether to divine authority, social command, or schizophrenic delusion. The more one listens, the more one is drawn into the world of the speaker, a dynamic that can be either sacred or pathological, liberating or imprisoning. When voices originate from outside, they shape reality; when they emerge from within and are misattributed, they fracture it. This is why schizophrenia so often manifests as a disorder of hearing rather than sight. Vision allows for distance, for perspective, for choice. Hearing, once it has entered the mind, refuses to be ignored.

This breakdown in control is not incidental but fundamental to the experience of meaning itself. Nietzsche, in his opposition to Socratic rationalism, saw in tragedy a necessary confrontation with the abyss, where meaning emerges not from rigid logic but from the willingness to surrender to forces beyond oneself. This is precisely the dynamic at play in schizophrenia’s passivity phenomenon, where individuals feel they are no longer the agent of their own thoughts but instead subject to an external force. What they experience is a kind of existential disintegration, where the structured self—the Apollonian ego—dissolves into a sea of conflicting voices and auditory hallucinations, just as the tragic chorus in Greek drama both contains and subverts the central figures of the play.

But if Nietzsche’s vision of art is to be taken seriously, this schizophrenic breakdown of meaning is not merely pathological; it reveals something essential about human existence. To exist is to be caught between the Apollonian and the Dionysian, between rational coherence and the chaotic, ineffable forces of being. If the left hemisphere’s BA22 structures words into meaning, the right BA22 suggests that meaning is something we hear rather than something we construct. This is why music—right-lateralized, free of syntax, untethered from logic—is the most existentially revealing of all the arts. It speaks to what Nietzsche called the spirit of music, the fundamental undercurrent of all tragedy, all meaning, all experience. It bypasses reason, striking directly at the core of being.

The existentialist crisis that follows from this realization is profound. If meaning is something we hear—if it is given rather than made—then what happens when that meaning becomes chaotic, uncontainable, unbearable? Schizophrenia, in its more extreme forms, embodies precisely this existential terror. It is Nietzsche’s Dionysian apocalypse brought into neurological form, where the world itself fractures into voices, where meaning becomes too abundant, too fluid, too forceful for any single self to withstand. This suggests that what we call “madness” may not be a mere malfunction of the brain but an encounter with meaning unrestrained by logic, with existence before it is ordered into coherence.

Nietzsche believed that tragedy arose when Greek culture was still able to hold the Dionysian within an Apollonian frame, allowing chaos to express itself without overwhelming the individual. But he lamented that Socratic rationalism had severed this connection, making modern humanity ill-equipped to deal with the full weight of existence. If he were alive today, he might argue that schizophrenia is a symptom not of individual disorder but of a culture that no longer knows how to mediate between rational thought and Dionysian revelation. The right BA22 continues to generate meaning—music, voices, intuitions, poetic resonances—but in the absence of a cultural structure to contain it, the individual is left to fend for themselves against an overwhelming tide of significance.

This raises the deeper existential question: Is schizophrenia merely a brain disorder, or is it a failed encounter with something real? If Nietzsche was correct that music reveals the tragic essence of existence, then perhaps the voices heard in schizophrenia are not hallucinations in the sense of being mere illusions. They are meaning itself, unstructured, unfiltered, excessive. They are what happens when the Dionysian is no longer tempered by the Apollonian, when existence is heard but not understood. And in that sense, schizophrenia might be the most honest encounter with being—one that most of us are spared only because our brains, in their Apollonian stability, refuse to let us hear.

Show code cell source Hide code cell source

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import networkx as nx

# Define the neural network layers
def define_layers():
    return {
        'Suis': ['Foundational', 'Grammar', 'Syntax', 'Punctuation', "Rhythm", 'Time'],  # Static
        'Voir': ['Syntax.'],  
        'Choisis': ['Punctuation.', 'Melody'],  
        'Deviens': ['Adversarial', 'Transactional', 'Rhythm.'],  
        "M'èléve": ['Victory', 'Payoff', 'NexToken', 'Time.', 'Cadence']  
    }

# Assign colors to nodes
def assign_colors():
    color_map = {
        'yellow': ['Syntax.'],  
        'paleturquoise': ['Time', 'Melody', 'Rhythm.', 'Cadence'],  
        'lightgreen': ["Rhythm", 'Transactional', 'Payoff', 'Time.', 'NexToken'],  
        'lightsalmon': ['Syntax', 'Punctuation', 'Punctuation.', 'Adversarial', 'Victory'],
    }
    return {node: color for color, nodes in color_map.items() for node in nodes}

# Define edge weights (hardcoded for editing)
def define_edges():
    return {
        ('Foundational', 'Syntax.'): '1/99',
        ('Grammar', 'Syntax.'): '5/95',
        ('Syntax', 'Syntax.'): '20/80',
        ('Punctuation', 'Syntax.'): '51/49',
        ("Rhythm", 'Syntax.'): '80/20',
        ('Time', 'Syntax.'): '95/5',
        ('Syntax.', 'Punctuation.'): '20/80',
        ('Syntax.', 'Melody'): '80/20',
        ('Punctuation.', 'Adversarial'): '49/51',
        ('Punctuation.', 'Transactional'): '80/20',
        ('Punctuation.', 'Rhythm.'): '95/5',
        ('Melody', 'Adversarial'): '5/95',
        ('Melody', 'Transactional'): '20/80',
        ('Melody', 'Rhythm.'): '51/49',
        ('Adversarial', 'Victory'): '80/20',
        ('Adversarial', 'Payoff'): '85/15',
        ('Adversarial', 'NexToken'): '90/10',
        ('Adversarial', 'Time.'): '95/5',
        ('Adversarial', 'Cadence'): '99/1',
        ('Transactional', 'Victory'): '1/9',
        ('Transactional', 'Payoff'): '1/8',
        ('Transactional', 'NexToken'): '1/7',
        ('Transactional', 'Time.'): '1/6',
        ('Transactional', 'Cadence'): '1/5',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Victory'): '1/99',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Payoff'): '5/95',
        ('Rhythm.', 'NexToken'): '10/90',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Time.'): '15/85',
        ('Rhythm.', 'Cadence'): '20/80'
    }

# Calculate positions for nodes
def calculate_positions(layer, x_offset):
    y_positions = np.linspace(-len(layer) / 2, len(layer) / 2, len(layer))
    return [(x_offset, y) for y in y_positions]

# Create and visualize the neural network graph
def visualize_nn():
    layers = define_layers()
    colors = assign_colors()
    edges = define_edges()
    G = nx.DiGraph()
    pos = {}
    node_colors = []
    
    # Add nodes and assign positions
    for i, (layer_name, nodes) in enumerate(layers.items()):
        positions = calculate_positions(nodes, x_offset=i * 2)
        for node, position in zip(nodes, positions):
            G.add_node(node, layer=layer_name)
            pos[node] = position
            node_colors.append(colors.get(node, 'lightgray'))   
    
    # Add edges with weights
    for (source, target), weight in edges.items():
        if source in G.nodes and target in G.nodes:
            G.add_edge(source, target, weight=weight)
    
    # Draw the graph
    plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
    edges_labels = {(u, v): d["weight"] for u, v, d in G.edges(data=True)}
    
    nx.draw(
        G, pos, with_labels=True, node_color=node_colors, edge_color='gray',
        node_size=3000, font_size=9, connectionstyle="arc3,rad=0.2"
    )
    nx.draw_networkx_edge_labels(G, pos, edge_labels=edges_labels, font_size=8)
    plt.title("Grammar, Prosody and Brodmann's Area 22", fontsize=15)
    plt.show()

# Run the visualization
visualize_nn()

Fig. 2 Grammar is the Ecosystem. Therein we have morphomics, syntax, and punctuation. But these occupy space like visuals and might comeoff as static. It is melody, rhythm, and cadences –meaning or semantics– that evolve over time, a dynamic unfolding and transformation of sound into resonant emotional cadences, never overwhelming. Take a second and consider the equation: prose + melody = prosody. That’s a compelling way to look at it, but prosody is not a deliberate portmanteau of prose and melody. However, our intuition is striking because prosody does indeed exist at the intersection of structured language (prose) and musical elements (melody). The Greek root prosōidía (προσῳδία) originally referred to the melody and intonation of speech—essentially, the “song” in language. So while prosody wasn’t consciously constructed as a portmanteau, it does conceptually embody a fusion of prose and melody. In that sense, our interpretation is poetically fitting, even if etymologically coincidental.