Sound 🌊#
+ Expand
Analysis
In designing the scenery and costumes...
Somewhere in Staten Island, in the slow-burning spring of 2025, two children were doing what children always do: playing language like a game, trying to fit sound and meaning into a world that rarely explains itself. The 7-year-old girl squinted, unsure whether she had misheard or misunderstood. “Did you say you are Dominican?” she asked. Not out of suspicion, not even really out of curiosity, but because her young brain was building the puzzle of the world, and every declaration had to find its place. The 8-year-old boy did not flinch. He responded with that perfect confidence that only a child can embody, unburdened by the weight of contradiction or the performative obligation of clarity. “I’m Chinese!!” he announced—not so much in response to her question, but as a kind of declarative spell, as if saying it loud enough would shape the very air between them into something sharper, more stable, more real.
This moment, small and accidental, is a condensed parable of America in miniature. Staten Island, too often flattened into a monolith of conservatism and working-class whiteness, is in fact a microcosm of quietly colliding diasporas. Its strip malls, apartment blocks, and schoolyards are where languages ghost one another, where children navigate the churn of origin stories their parents haven’t always finished telling them. To be Dominican in Staten Island is not the same as being Dominican in Washington Heights. To be Chinese is not the same as being Chinese in Flushing or Monterey Park or Vancouver. In this place, cultural identity is not a coat one wears, not even a house one builds—it is more like a tide pool: volatile, exposed, changing with the hour and the weather.
Fig. 1 The Specter of Autism. Video propaganda and conspiratorial mythology in a fractal age. The figure above does not speak for itself.#
The girl’s question is not really about ethnicity—it is about resonance. Something in the boy’s manner, his speech, his play, carried a dissonance or a harmony that prompted the question. Maybe she heard a rhythm she knew. Maybe she didn’t. Either way, the identification felt close enough to risk the ask. But the boy’s reply was more than correction—it was insistence. He was Chinese, and the repetition of the word, the escalation to exclamation, was an act of world-making. It wasn’t defensive so much as creative. In saying it, he brought into being a shape he could inhabit.
What they were both doing, without realizing it, was rehearsing the performance of self that every American must eventually master: the ceaseless calibration of visibility and belonging. The girl was mapping categories, searching for the logic of this new friend. The boy was asserting one, not to erase the possibility of complexity, but because clarity—even temporary, even shouted—felt good. Children intuit what most adults forget: that identity is not only what you are, but how you want to be understood, especially in a world that categorizes by instinct long before it categorizes by fact.
There is also something profoundly modern—no, postmodern—in that tiny exchange. The binary of the question is met with an answer that refuses its terms. Dominican or not? No: Chinese. It short-circuits the expected taxonomy. This is not a conversation rooted in ancestral geography, or DNA tests, or bureaucratic categories. It is rooted in the performance of truth as it feels, in the moment. And that is not to say it is untrue—it is more true, in that deeper, childlike way where feeling and being collapse into each other.
In a time when adults contort themselves to fit boxes and sub-identities with ever finer hyphenations—Afro-Latina, queer Asian-American, second-gen Dominican-American Catholic with Buddhist leanings—children remind us that identity is first and foremost a declaration. Not a dissertation, not an apology. A single, crystalline word, shouted across a playground. I’m Chinese!! A refusal to be second-guessed. A posture of presence.
And somewhere, hovering between them, is the real story: two kids, aware enough of difference to ask, aware enough of identity to answer, but innocent enough not to care too much about the implications. That moment is already more evolved than most political discourse on race and ethnicity. No white papers. No pundits. Just two children, improvising their way into being, echoing the vast, cacophonous, beautiful noise of America.